RE: Vision (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room



Message

Kapitanma -> RE: Vision (5/3/2011 6:56:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

-Yasukuni. IJN version of Ki-67. "Yasukuni" might actually be the name of the naval unit, that employed these bombers in RL, but I can't find any other designation for them.



Long time lurker here, I just figured I'd chime in about this designation. I took a quick look, and naval attack variant of the Ki-67I was indeed referred to as Yasukuni(靖国) after the Yasukuni Shrine. The interceptor version (Ki-109) was also referred to as Yasukuni.



bigred -> RE: 800kg (5/5/2011 2:44:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

I really wanted that 800 kg payload.  Is the d4y4 is worth the R/D?
Ummm.

Now I see the d5y1 myojo w/ the 800kg payload.....it sure does look good. In the tree w/ the d3a2val.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/DF156C8421C84F39B694E065122D4D20.jpg[/image]



findmeifyoucan -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/5/2011 10:09:52 PM)

What A/C aircraft uses the HA 34 engine? Is there an easy way to find out what aircraft and what future aircraft uses what engine?



bigred -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 3:55:03 AM)

Off top of my head only 2 planes use the ha34.
Ki44 and the ki49.

select the engine tab in air production, then select ha34.



findmeifyoucan -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 4:00:59 AM)

So is it even worth making the HA 34 or should I just switch to something more useful like Ha 31,32,33 or 35 for early 1942?



PaxMondo -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 5:12:17 AM)

Well, most IJ players like the Helen and Tojo.  And they tend to build a LOT of them.  Like everything else in the IJ economy, you need to plan it and then make your moves slow and easy.  Fragile economies don't react nicely to heavy handed techniques.



findmeifyoucan -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 10:19:54 AM)

Maybe so but the HA34 only is for the Helen's and the Tojo is HA 35's. So at this point I don't think it is necessary to have two factories making HA34's and I think I will switch one of those factories for HA35's. I believe that the Japanese can never have enough of the HA35's. lol :-)



Puhis -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 10:22:48 AM)

Tojo is nowadays using (historical) Ha-34. One of the patches changed it.



findmeifyoucan -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 5:46:08 PM)

Oh really? I thought I had the latest patch? Or does the game just not tell you and it is just a surprise when they use a different engine than otherwise indicated? Are there anymore surprises to expect that the game is also not telling me about? lol



Puhis -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 6:36:07 PM)

It was 5th patch, 1.01.06i

5.14. [768] Ki-44 Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.15. [769] Ki-44-IIa Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.16. [770] Ki-44-IIb Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.17. [771] Ki-44-IIc Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.

No problems with ongoing games, unless you accepted DB changes. I did once, and run out of Ha-34s.

Apparently this mod have same changes.



findmeifyoucan -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 6:48:07 PM)

I just checked and I have 1.04.1106i . Isn't that the latest patch and if so why doesn't the game tell me?

Hmmmm, I did accept data base changes but it is very early in the game for me when I did that like first two weeks of the war so probably doesn't matter.



DivePac88 -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/11/2011 9:40:21 PM)

1.04.1106i was the last official data patch build, but public beta1108m3 is the current exe patch build.



John 3rd -> RE: IJ production mistakes (5/12/2011 3:32:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Puhis

It was 5th patch, 1.01.06i

5.14. [768] Ki-44 Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.15. [769] Ki-44-IIa Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.16. [770] Ki-44-IIb Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.
5.17. [771] Ki-44-IIc Tojo: Engine changed to Nakajima Ha-34.

No problems with ongoing games, unless you accepted DB changes. I did once, and run out of Ha-34s.

Apparently this mod have same changes.


I'll make sure Stanislav knows this with RA 3.0 about to come out. THANKS!

EDIT: Just checked with Tracker and RA already has Tojo with Ha-34.




Cannonfodder -> RE: Vision (5/20/2011 5:25:44 PM)

Tip for Japanese aircraft production - specialise specialise specialise! Find the planes you want for major roles and plan accordingly!!!



bigred -> 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:05:05 AM)

November 42 has arrived in my game w/ Dirty Harry.  I have had a problem w/ loading tracker so I restarted tracker around 42oct.  I tried to use the nomad v4 defined regions but could not get a good reading.

highlights from the industry chart are:
1.. -1100 oil per day. this was around -4000 so aI have put a dent in the loss. But still need to look for a better path.
2. Supply continues to produce +27000 per day in Tokyo.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/C2FEB3A893DE4A748BD0CF8B73103FBF.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:08:44 AM)

Report 2 shows

[image]local://upfiles/27655/CA530ABD1D4342E4BEC557F3FA750D6B.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:11:57 AM)

Report 3 shows engine production. I was alarmed at the ha-60 for the d4y1 judy. then saw I have a pool. Seems the judy just started production.



[image]local://upfiles/27655/AB29383830154B5085008488EA489633.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:15:49 AM)

report 4 shows frame production.  I noted the judy has started.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/856DBD0521D54188ADBB01CF4C93C495.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:16:38 AM)

report 5. I needed t share what I am not building also to allow reader comment on possible errors.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/F4BEC21E236B4B4CAB0AA1C9EC396DF4.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:18:07 AM)

report 6: Im my other game w/ FatR he has the ki61 deployed into burma jan43. Note the research on the a6m5b. I plan to skip production and go straight research into the m8 w/ 3 factories at30 research points each per month.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/69FEB2C0C9D94A09819F80F99283CA4D.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:20:25 AM)

Report 7:  The other (lower) half of R/D. I have been critizied for not converting some of these factories. My lack of experieced selection of frames for future ops causes me to pause.

This chart reminds me AI have an opportunity to bring in the myoko maybe a year early if I get to work on it.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/509157E3E6DB4D08BE02150507FE452B.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:22:17 AM)

report 8: I note a loss of 347 naval build points per turn. It is suggested I have too many naval points. Seems You use it or lose it.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/538165395C434DF1892468B7B42B8145.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:24:58 AM)

report 9: Not much left on the cruiser list.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/E74007C489CF4369BD740C0D7CAB40BB.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:26:14 AM)

report 10:

[image]local://upfiles/27655/9FA22FF90E4A4D33BDC1DA180315C42F.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/25/2011 4:27:01 AM)

report 11: oops, repeat.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/64C940D7F8224870BCD169DB5CA3C541.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/29/2011 3:57:13 AM)

I needed to make some changes to air production.
1.  turned on ha35 production.


[image]local://upfiles/27655/CA54F3E29003448AA53D3A68ADEFFAF9.jpg[/image]



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (5/29/2011 4:05:35 AM)

2.  Converted one 30frame ki44IIa to ki44IIb.  This will give me 90 r/d per month.
3.  converted active ki48IIa to ki48IIb r/d.   Wanted to get the DB into the field.
4.  Used all the kubota engines so turned of the ki27 production.
5.  Converted ki67a peggy r/d to ki61a r/d.  This gives me 4 factories for the ki61a.  One will produce current model,  others will continue r/d on the ki61b..

7nov42.



bigred -> RE: 42nov report (6/8/2011 3:48:35 AM)

I am scrounging around looking for 1/2 r/d factories to change r/d to d5y1myoko.   This is the grandson of the d3a1 val w/ an 800kg bomb.
Nominations for r/d discontinued are:
g8n1 Rita, --I really like 16 250kg payload, but will it be able to penetrate in 45?
ki95 recon---I am happy w/ the ki46, why pay extra.
ki83 2 eng ftr for 44, will the cannons really make a difference?
ki119 fb--come on---- 2 range?
p1y1 frances---do I really need another torp delivery system?  It does have armor in late 43.
ki74--lb---a 1945 2e level bomber--can I get by w/ the ki49 till end game?


AGAIN THIS IS ANOTHER MISTAKE...I SHOULD HAVE MADE THESE DECISIONS ON 1ST WEEK OF GAME FOR MAX EARLY ENTRY OF THESE WEAPONS.
Side note--I converted d5y1 myoko R/D to d3a2 val w/ current build of 1.  Then after fix at 1000 points I will inlarge factory to 30(cost 3000 supply) and convert back to d5y1 myoko r/d(at no cost).

I have been thinking about converting the sally factory to something else(size23) but to do so would cost 23000supply.  W/ this RA70 senario I suspect I will need the supply to fort up the centpac.  So If I cant get a conversion cheap then for me it is a no go!!!




bigred -> RE: 42nov report (6/8/2011 2:58:33 PM)

I could put the sally factory into R/D something which IIRC would spread the cost out over a period of time.



bigred -> RE: factory repair (6/16/2011 8:50:43 PM)

I was looking thru tracker mid nov42 and found a few factories that need to be "repair off".  If not then cost is 1000supply points per repaired factory.

[image]local://upfiles/27655/3EA30867B153462FAA372FA8264DEABB.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  14 15 16 [17] 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.734375E-02