CHS and Pearl Harbor

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

rockmedic109
Posts: 2414
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by rockmedic109 »

CHS 1.02 with ver 1.6, Against Japanese AI.

Ran about ten first turns in last 10 hours or so. The first few as is, then ran a few with varying degrees of damage and or flotation to Oklahoma and Arizona. Trying to get close to a historic result. Utah always goes down but only had Oklahoma sink {Magazine explosion}. Usually have only two heavily damaged BBs. I tried up to 70 flotation and 70 System damage {the numbers input into the Database editor--I do not know if that was supposed to be given as "700" to get 70%}. I tried my last one without any damage to the BBs but putting all of Pearl Harbor's fighter squadrons on Training and got the best results. Only Utah sank, but most are over 50% system damage.

I don't know if it was luck or if the lack of CAP caused less disruption to the attackers, giving better results. Those wanting a little better Pearl Harbor attacks might want to look into it. IJN air losses within about 10% of what I remember the average to be {memory--not scientific}. Allies air losses are about 15% less than usual during the runs.



Day Air attack on Pearl Harbor , at 114,72

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 57
D3A2 Val x 137
B5N2 Kate x 157

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 5 destroyed, 10 damaged
D3A2 Val: 10 destroyed, 68 damaged
B5N2 Kate: 6 destroyed, 30 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
PBY Catalina: 20 destroyed
P-40B Tomahawk: 24 destroyed
F4F-3 Wildcat: 2 destroyed
P-36A Mohawk: 10 destroyed
B-17D Fortress: 3 destroyed
B-18A Bolo: 8 destroyed
SBD Dauntless: 5 destroyed
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 4 destroyed
C-47 Dakota: 1 destroyed
B-17E Fortress: 4 destroyed
A-20B Boston: 2 destroyed
P-26A: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
BB Pennsylvania, Bomb hits 12, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
BB Arizona, Bomb hits 8, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
BB West Virginia, Bomb hits 7, Torpedo hits 2, on fire
BB California, Bomb hits 10, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
BB Oklahoma, Bomb hits 7, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
BB Tennessee, Bomb hits 14, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
BB Maryland, Bomb hits 10, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
CL Detroit, Bomb hits 1
BB Nevada, Bomb hits 9
PC Tiger, Bomb hits 1, on fire
BB Utah, Bomb hits 12, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CA New Orleans, Bomb hits 1, on fire
ML Oglala, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CL Phoenix, Bomb hits 1
AVD Avocet, Bomb hits 1
CA San Francisco, Bomb hits 1


Allied ground losses:
220 casualties reported
Guns lost 5

Airbase hits 50
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 293
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4069
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Andrew Brown »

Have you tried it without the Utah?

*ducks for cover*
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
rockmedic109
Posts: 2414
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by rockmedic109 »

Nope {hitting myself in the forehead}.

Tonight was my first try with the Database editor. I'd heard about the increasing the damage on Arizona and Oklahoma and the Hong Kong 50 forts and figured I would try it out.

When I was lurking and reading about the discussions over Utah, I was always thinking it best to leave her in. Now, I am not so sure. I still have a strong nostalgic pull to leave to old boat in.

I also kinda like it when PG Wake survive the Kates and gets done in by the museum pieces {Idzumo and Iwate}.

Of course you've done it now. I am going to have to take Utah out and run a turn. Oh well, don't have to be to work for another 13 hours.

Great job on the CHS package and my many thanks {and my wife's curses!}.

Stephen E Hood
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 11322
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Sardaukar »

With 1.01 I didn't lose single BB, but most were severely damaged. I did scuttle Utah..it was 98 sys and was consuming valuable repair points. I hope to be as lucky next time too (this is of course against AI).
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4069
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109
Great job on the CHS package and my many thanks {and my wife's curses!}.

You can thank Don. He's "the man".
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by timtom »

Kudos all round to the CHS team. I, in particular, love the naval OOB chances. Whoever came up withthe idea of adding those scooners should be awarded a medal.

Anyways, I've run PH a few times (only), with or without the Utah, and my expericence is pretty similar to yours, Steven.

In my personal version of CHS, I'm removing the Utah. Although I appreciate the reasons for putting her there in the first place, my experience (such as it is) indicates to me that it overstates its soak-up effect. Furthermore, being potentially left with an otherwise useless ship doesn't go well with my anal-compulsive disorder - although in fairness the Utah has invariably sunk so far - and I'm instituting a few other chances that mostly favours the Allies, so in the name of balance...
Where's the Any key?

Image
rockmedic109
Posts: 2414
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by rockmedic109 »

Just ran a turn 1 without Utah {while I was baking cookies for my wife--shocking what marriage makes you do}. One run is not a good sample, but this one only had two BBs with greater than 50% sys damage.

I think I'll just take that last run and make a game of it.

Gotta go. The cookies are done.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Terminus »

COOKIES... COOKIES... COOKIES...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Ron Saueracker »

The problem is not having the Utah in, the problem which is causing the lighter than historical losses is the fact that Battleship Row can't be modelled to simulate half the BBs being immune to torp attacks (Maryland, Tennessee, Arizona and Pennsylvania were either inboard of other ships or in drydock). Therefore the torp hits are being spread out as opposed to concentrated on the actual outboard ships.
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by timtom »

(nuff, nuff) Any word on the non-respawn version, Ron?
Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by treespider »

Consider it sacrilege....how about a Dec 8th CHS start? That way everything starts historically. Without deep Japanese operations and the like that take advantage of the first turn surprise movement rule...

Pearl Harbor would have the historical damage done....etc.
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
Montbrun
Posts: 1487
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Montbrun »

For single-play that would be nice. But for PBEM, the Japanese player can lose out on alot of VPs...

Brad
WitE Alpha/Beta Tester
WitE Research Team
WitE2.0 Alpha/Beta Tester
WitE2.0 Research Team
WitW Alpha/Beta Tester
WitW Research Team
Piercing Fortress Europa Research Team
Desert War 1940-1942 Alpha/Beta Tester
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by treespider »

I thought VP's can be adjusted at start to account for the short fall...plus from my one experience so far and from the sound of this thread and other peoples experiences they do not garner alot of VP's anyway..
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
jcjordan
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 8:00 am

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by jcjordan »

Well in my current game me vs AI IJN I lost 4 BB's to the AI with Utah only taking 40 sys & the others in the 20's & below, so it can happen.
User avatar
doktorblood
Posts: 561
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 5:40 am

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by doktorblood »

ORIGINAL: jcjordan

Well in my current game me vs AI IJN I lost 4 BB's to the AI with Utah only taking 40 sys & the others in the 20's & below, so it can happen.

Quick....have the AI go buy you a lotto ticket!
Image
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: timtom

(nuff, nuff) Any word on the non-respawn version, Ron?

Justin (TankerAce) is going to put it out as soon as WPO is in the oven.[:)]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Sharkosaurus rex
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:25 am
Location: under the waves
Contact:

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Sharkosaurus rex »

I know this is the HISTORICAL scenario, but think out of the box for a moment. If you make the two BB that had the historically lowest damage re-inforcements that arrive on turn two with some damage already taken. This would give the Jap Pearl Harbour strike the concentration against the remaining six BBs. And maybe the Japs wouldn't have to wait around PH for three or four days sinking them all.

I don't know if that would satisfy anyone but it might help.
Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 4874
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by Tanaka »

Wondered if anyone had considered this regarding CHS pearl harbor results and standard game ones.

In CHS people have to use Nagumo.

In the standard game everyone uses Yamaguchi.

Leaders have a impact in this game. Utah aside, maybe this is one of the big differences...

This also poses the question: Why was KB moved out of port in the CHS? Was this to prevent this change?
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by witpqs »

Well, two days ago I ran (Allies vs AI) turn 1 CHS 1.06 and WiTP v1.602. I got 2 BB's sunk, all the rest with heavy damage (none sank nor were real close to it), several cruisers and destroyers with heavy damage, and a few other ships with serious to heavy damage. If there was a problem with damage being too light at PH, I think they fixed it.
rockmedic109
Posts: 2414
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: CHS and Pearl Harbor

Post by rockmedic109 »

I ran it with CHS 1.06 on monday. California was destroyed by Magazine explosion and Arizona was a loss after 1 torp and MANY 800kg AP bombs. I also had two BBs with 90+% sys damage.

I put all Kates on Port attack and the Vals on airfield {maybe one on port}. I also put Tennessee, Maryland and Pennsylvania arriving on Dec 8 with damage.

I was happy with the results. I don't know why...probably just luck, I have been getting more Magazine explosions lately.

I love CHS.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”