Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Terminus »

Conventional wisdom has it that the Helldiver was somewhat inferior to the Dauntless which it was supposed to replace. This leads to my two questions:

1): To what extent do people replace Dauntless with Helldiver in the game (this assumes Player Def Upgraded turned "On" as I have)?

2): Does anybody know how much the Dauntless continued in use after the introduction of the Helldiver? I have an idea that maybe the Marines would keep their Dauntlesses in service (because they like to do things their own way [:)]) but I have nothing concrete to back it up...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6002
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Brady »


The SBD was used by the Navy for as long as posable, the Navy did as you say Dislike the Helldiver and it was indead a POS in many way's. I recently read Pill "Beads" Pop's Memoir, in which he mentions the SBD"S on the Bunker Hill (He was in VF-17, then Did Another tour on the Bunker Hill later in the war), he said that he was always glad he never had to fly them, he watched a few fall off the end of the flight deck on T/O and never make it up, they went right into the sea, their reputation was horiable.

SBD's were used by New Zeland later in the war, and by Free French Forces in Europe as well late in the war, amongst others.


[center]Image[/center]



Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Terminus »

It was very difficult to land, as well, what with its loooooong nose and high main landing gear.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Mike Scholl »

The "Helldiver" was a superior A/C to the "Dauntless" in almost every normal respect...,
but it was a bitch to fly. Crews preferred the older Dauntless which was a "sweet
handling" plane. An example of "poor market research".
User avatar
Kadrin
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Orange, California

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Kadrin »

The Helldiver meets or beats the Dauntless in every category except for maneuverability in the game. So the question is do you want to keep that maneuverability?

And Helldiver's could not take off from CVE's in real life, not sure about CVL's...
Image
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Hornblower »

Gamewise the Helldiver is better, real life is a diffrent story.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by crsutton »

Well, the helldiver was superior to the dauntless in most aspects. Problem was that the dauntless was such an easy forgiving plane to fly. Whenever you have a massed produced pilot training system that is inevitable in wartime, and an expanding airforce-the bulk of your pilots are going to be relatively inexperienced. This makes a good argument for simple planes that are forgiving to young inexperience pilots. The B26-B25 debate is the same. No question that the B26 was a fast hot airplane and better than the 25 in many ways. However, the B25 was loved by pilots because it was a gentle plane to fly and the average pilot felt that he had a better chance to come home in a B25.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Terminus »

I read somewhere that in order to dispel the B-26's "Widowmaker" reputation, Jimmy Doolitle took it on a tour of all Marauder airfields in England, doing aerobatics, flying on one engine, and what have you... Don't know if it worked.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22653
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

I read somewhere that in order to dispel the B-26's "Widowmaker" reputation, Jimmy Doolitle took it on a tour of all Marauder airfields in England, doing aerobatics, flying on one engine, and what have you... Don't know if it worked.


Still has the Widowmaker rep, i think...
User avatar
SpitfireIX
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Fort Wayne IN USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by SpitfireIX »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

I read somewhere that in order to dispel the B-26's "Widowmaker" reputation, Jimmy Doolitle took it on a tour of all Marauder airfields in England, doing aerobatics, flying on one engine, and what have you... Don't know if it worked.

Oh, yes, it definitely worked. See here for the whole story.
"I know Japanese. He is very bad. And tricky. But we Americans too smart. We catch him and give him hell."

--Benny Sablan, crewman, USS Enterprise 12/7/41
User avatar
Capt Cliff
Posts: 1713
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: Northwest, USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Capt Cliff »

I worked with a gentleman who flew off the Saratoga in WWII. He flew both the SBD and the SB2C and according to him the SB2C was a poor dive bombing plateform. The airplane was too heavy for the dive brakes or the dive brakes were not big enough. He said with the SBD you could really line up on your targer and had time to put the pickle in the middle. In the SB2C you were pressed for time to get the job done (she fell like a ton of bricks), sort of like a one armed paper hanger hangin wallpaper in a wind storm, you were really busy flying the SB2C where as the SBD flew itself (the sweet handling charactoristics). They did a lot of glide bombing with the SB2C.

By the way Doolittle did his B-26 aerobatic's stateside, not in England. His best stunt was to feather one of his engines on takeoff then turn into the dead engine, an absolute No-No, but he pulled it off. He also wanted to take the B-26 on his Tokyo raid but knew the average pilot could take her off of a carrier deck.
Capt. Cliff
User avatar
Oznoyng
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Mars

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Oznoyng »

ORIGINAL: Brady
The SBD was used by the Navy for as long as posable, the Navy did as you say Dislike the Helldiver and it was indead a POS in many way's. I recently read Pill "Beads" Pop's Memoir, in which he mentions the SBD"S on the Bunker Hill (He was in VF-17, then Did Another tour on the Bunker Hill later in the war), he said that he was always glad he never had to fly them, he watched a few fall off the end of the flight deck on T/O and never make it up, they went right into the sea, their reputation was horiable.

SBD's were used by New Zeland later in the war, and by Free French Forces in Europe as well late in the war, amongst others.
Hey, sounds ike they killed a few froggies. Can't be all bad.
"There is no Black or White, only shades of Grey."
"If you aren't a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem."
User avatar
Brausepaul
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Deutschland

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Brausepaul »

ORIGINAL: Oznoyng
ORIGINAL: Brady
The SBD was used by the Navy for as long as posable, the Navy did as you say Dislike the Helldiver and it was indead a POS in many way's. I recently read Pill "Beads" Pop's Memoir, in which he mentions the SBD"S on the Bunker Hill (He was in VF-17, then Did Another tour on the Bunker Hill later in the war), he said that he was always glad he never had to fly them, he watched a few fall off the end of the flight deck on T/O and never make it up, they went right into the sea, their reputation was horiable.

SBD's were used by New Zeland later in the war, and by Free French Forces in Europe as well late in the war, amongst others.
Hey, sounds ike they killed a few froggies. Can't be all bad.

What a dumb statement.
User avatar
SpitfireIX
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Fort Wayne IN USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by SpitfireIX »

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

By the way Doolittle did his B-26 aerobatic's stateside, not in England. His best stunt was to feather one of his engines on takeoff then turn into the dead engine, an absolute No-No, but he pulled it off. He also wanted to take the B-26 on his Tokyo raid but knew the average pilot could take her off of a carrier deck.

Actually, if you read the excerpts from Doolittle's autobiography I linked above, you'll see he did it twice--in the US, right after Pearl Harbor, and then again in Britain about a year later. Also, the issue with using the B-26 for the Doolittle raid wasn't piloting skill required to take off--because of the Marauder's very high wing loading, its takeoff speed was impossibly high for it to be launched from a carrier--even Doolittle himself couldn't have done it.
"I know Japanese. He is very bad. And tricky. But we Americans too smart. We catch him and give him hell."

--Benny Sablan, crewman, USS Enterprise 12/7/41
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by DrewMatrix »

Phooey ("Pfui" to those of you of Deutsch persuasion). I thought this was another of those MacArthur bashing threads. [:(]
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
panda124c
Posts: 1517
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by panda124c »

ORIGINAL: SpitfireIX

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

By the way Doolittle did his B-26 aerobatic's stateside, not in England. His best stunt was to feather one of his engines on takeoff then turn into the dead engine, an absolute No-No, but he pulled it off. He also wanted to take the B-26 on his Tokyo raid but knew the average pilot could take her off of a carrier deck.

Actually, if you read the excerpts from Doolittle's autobiography I linked above, you'll see he did it twice--in the US, right after Pearl Harbor, and then again in Britain about a year later. Also, the issue with using the B-26 for the Doolittle raid wasn't piloting skill required to take off--because of the Marauder's very high wing loading, its takeoff speed was impossibly high for it to be launched from a carrier--even Doolittle himself couldn't have done it.
He also did the same in the SW Pacific for Kennedy's boys. The A model was also know as "The Flying Prostitute" because it has 'no visable means of support" refering to the short wing span. The B's and later had a longer wing making the wing loading lower. However empty and in a shallow dive a Zero could not catch the B-26. So going downhill from Rabaul was much safer in a B-26. Great Airplane. Bombers are not suppose to be "hot aircraft". [:-]
User avatar
Capt Cliff
Posts: 1713
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: Northwest, USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by Capt Cliff »

Spitfire IX, it has to do with Vmc or velocity minimum control and NOT wing loading. There is also V2 speed that allows for manueverability. The B-26 Vmc was higher than the B-25 which is a function of airfoil shape in concert with wing loading. There were to many variables like speed of the carrier and headwind that had to be maximized for the B-26 to work. I have no doubt Gen. Doolittle could have taken a B-26 off the Hornet, but the B-25 gave everyone a higher margin of safety than the B-26 would have.
Capt. Cliff
User avatar
SpitfireIX
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Fort Wayne IN USA

RE: Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class

Post by SpitfireIX »

ORIGINAL: pbear


The A model was also know as "The Flying Prostitute" because it has 'no visable means of support" refering to the short wing span. The B's and later had a longer wing making the wing loading lower. However empty and in a shallow dive a Zero could not catch the B-26. So going downhill from Rabaul was much safer in a B-26. Great Airplane. Bombers are not suppose to be "hot aircraft". [:-]


Actually, the benefits of the new wing were somewhat offset by an increase in gross weight, due to additional equipment. See here.
"I know Japanese. He is very bad. And tricky. But we Americans too smart. We catch him and give him hell."

--Benny Sablan, crewman, USS Enterprise 12/7/41
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”