Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
joelmar
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:05 pm

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by joelmar »

Looks like the retreat is doing fine and you should have time to get most of the 6th army and Army group A units in security to the Donets line before blizzard.

The Soviets armies involved in Uranus are a fearsome lot from afar, but after a closer look they don't have that much CV.

What are the forcasts?
"The closer you get to the meaning, the sooner you'll know that you're dreamin'" -Dio
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

The forecast is, when the Soviets remain somewhat passive I can hopefully pacman them to death. If they are aggressive and do attacks even if win chance is 1/3rd or when they expect good loss ratios even for a hold, the current position will quickly erode and dreams of counterattacks must be abandoned.
The Soviets also need to use their superiority in rail cap to their advantage. If they do it will be hard to contain all threats.
User avatar
xhoel
Posts: 3337
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 7:46 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by xhoel »

Very unfortunate to see that both pockets were opened, especially surprising to see the one in the north not hold.

I haven't played this scenario properly although I did start it against the AI and dropped it after a bit. From what I noticed, the first few turns will be the difficult ones for you, seeing how you have to juggle units around, activate statics units, garrison cities, play wack a mole with partisans. bring TOEs up to strength and organize your C&C. Once that is done, things should go much more smoothly but ofc that doesn't mean that you are safe.

Do you have a realistic offensive goal for 1943 like the historical offensive at Kursk or will you be pursuing a strategy of counterattacking?
AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

I have not yet made specific plans for the time after the mud. I think there is simply too much that can happen until then to start planning now. But if I see the chance I will not shy away from a Kursk type attack. Taking calculated risks is fun. One thing however is sure, any attack needs to employ concealment techniques. The time where you actually want the Soviets to pile up in front of your Panzer ball so you can take out more with one strike are over. Now you have to find a weak spot and use surprise. And an attack will require concentration of most motorised forces in one place, and it takes nerves of steel or quick legs on the rest of the front then.



User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T5, 17.12.1942 before Axis operations
Very little happens. Pockets remain closed.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T5, 17.12.1942 after Axis operations
The clearing of the pocket nets only around 45k prisoners. Disappointing, but on the other hand it shows the depleted state of many Soviet formations.

The completion of Büffelsturm raises the question "what next". The Soviet break-in into the Orel frontline must be dealt with. Strong Soviet formations are close or can be quickly railed in, and the place seems like the logical point of attack for the Reds to me to roll up my fortification belt and to destroy the cohesion of the front. So I intentionally leave a gap to lure them in, while preparing two Pincers on the flanks for operation Walkürenritt (sorry for the spelling mistake on the map). Depending on the Soviet reaction they will try to forma pocket or stabilise the frontline.

The forces from Büffelsturm I are too far North to help with this operation, and I dispatch them to take the clear hexagons North of Velikie Lukie next turn to strengthen my position there. A Soviet break-in here would threaten the vital North-South rail lines and tie up a significant amount of forces due to the clear terrain behind the swamps. So having the swamps as a wall would be really nice.

Image.
User avatar
joelmar
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:05 pm

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by joelmar »

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

The forecast is, when the Soviets remain somewhat passive I can hopefully pacman them to death.

Interesting thanks. Of course the Soviets railcap advantage and their front (almost) always being close to the railheads is IMO by far their biggest advantage, both in the game and in real life. I have read somewhere that one of the big thing of lend-lease was rail cars... and it was said in a somewhat dismissive manner... as if tanks were more important than rail cars to the soviets!

That said, when I asked about forecasts, I meant the weather forecasts... but I now have my answer since you posted the next turn!
"The closer you get to the meaning, the sooner you'll know that you're dreamin'" -Dio
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

We non-random weather so it is blizzard from 04.12.1942 to last february turn, then snow through march, then 4 turns of mud, then clear-mud-clear-mud a few times until summer comes.

Will make an AI vs. AI weather test run when the mud-clear-mud-clear phase comes.

At the moment the rail line situation for me is better than for the Soviets. But generally it is a plus for them, true.
And yes, trucks and locomotives and rail cars were very important for the Sovs. I guess most Soviet players would trade late war tank LL for late war truck LL in a hearbeat?
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T6, 24.12.1942 before Axis operations
Christmas for the Axis (not yet for the Orthodox-Russians), but fighting continues. The Soviets take Rshew and react to the planned Walkürenritt by shifting forces around.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T6, 24.12.1942 after Axis operations
Much action from North to South this time. Operation Nipple removal is completed at last. AGN&AGC take a number of swamp hexagons to solidify the position and to deny jump off points for the Soviets. The LVI PC with Großdeutschland conducts training manoeuvres near Kaluga with Soviet rifle units as sparring partners. Operation Walkürenritt promises to end the life of a few Soviet units, but the experiences from Büffelsturm I made me a bit cautious&pessimistic.

AGB tries to mess up Soviet fortifications. Due to low Soviet construction value repairing them will take an eternity.
Only moralising&frontline maintenance in the South. At first I planned a minor encirclement operation but I was on travel and had a power cut (forgot to plug in the laptop in time), so as compensation for inadvertent reloading the offensive was canceled and free intel of the Southern front given to the Soviets+no motorised forces must leave the area this turn. So rather scaled down operations there.



Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T7, 31.12.1942 before Axis operations
The Soviets don't do very much. Shock-induced paralysis? But Walkürenritt wasn't that bad after all?

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T7, 31.12.1942 Soviet propaganda
The Soviets don't do very much. Except for... Dropping some propaganda leaflets over the frontline to intimidate the German Landser. German colleges of fine art have been advised to execute a counterattack.

Image
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T7, 31.12.1942 after Axis operations
After the liquadation of the Walkürenritt pocket and completion of the swamp clearing offensive, motorised forces need a new job. I plan two new ambitious attacks. The first one is Operation Unthinkable, an attack on Leningrad. Leningrad is well fortified from the start of this campaign, but the Soviets have, for several turns in a row, left the backdoor over the Neva unguarded. A sneaky attack of a single Infantry Corp followed by a PC could take Osinovets and cut off Leningrad and its defenders. The key are stealthy preparation and success in the first try, there won't be a second chance against alerted defenders. Due to the fortified nature of the frontline, elite motorised forces will be used instead of Panzer divisions. The offensive is sheduled to finish redeployment in T8 (the Axis forces bookmarked were placed such that they can be railed in within one turn).

The second attac is Operation Siegfried. An attack in light woods is favourable because it makes concealment of the preparations much easier and gives the forces holding the walls of the pockets extra defensive CV, while being not too favourable for the defenders either. Deployment is to be completed by T9 and the should start in T10.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T8, 07.01.1943 before Axis operations
A new year begins. Will the War in the East finally end in this one? Time will tell.
In the area of AGN partisans blow up the key rail lines for the Unthinkable deployment. Finishing it within one turn is impossible so it is cancelled for now. Instead, Operation Siegfried will be scheduled one turn earlier now.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T8, 07.01.1943 after Axis operations
4 1/2 PC deploy for Operation Siegfried while AGN fixes the damaged rails. When I say it will launch in T9 I do so with hindsight, at this point I still planned with T10 and another PC. Therefore, I did not turn up MAX TOE for the infantry at the anticipated breakthrough points, a tactic I often use. Because the reinforcements will arrive only after the Soviet turn, it is an easy way to reinforce the point of attack without raising suspicion or using rail cap.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T8, 07.01.1943 Axis propaganda
Below you can see the suggestion of the German fine art colleges for a propaganda leaflet. Its abstract style obviously is utterly useless for the intended purpose and the German military staff wonders if the Nazi's purge against Degenerate Art has either removed the best heads or not been thorough enough.
At least we know where the next replacement wave can be drawn from.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T9, 14.01.1943 before Axis operations
The Soviets suddenly awake and launch attacks across the front. Nothing catastrophal but they all require some reaction. The Partisans at orange instead of read now, so apparently they receive more supplies now, which immediately shows in an increased number of attacks. If all this wasn't enough already, Recon shows formerly unseen forces in the Siegfried area. Much of the optimism from the last weeks is gone.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

T9, 14.01.1943 after Axis operations
After heated debates in the German high command, Operation Siegfried is launched and promises to become a success, even if only one instead of the two planned pockets can be formed. As said before I wanted to wait for more reinforcements but was afraid that the Soviets would have swarmed the area with their own forces for an attack (I do not think they spotted my forces) next turn so decided to begin immediately with less forces. The air force had to be rushed to the theatre as well from the Orel area. I hesitated to attack with the Western pincer, but finally decided to do so. A second pocket seemed unlikely (although possible) but it makes a Soviet counterattack against the pocket wall much more difficult. A Soviet stack goes into troll mode and resists two strong attacks, even though it was highly fatigued from a failed Soviet attack the turn before.
Otherwhere I simply improve the frontline condition and try to repair the damage caused by the Soviet attacks.
At the end of the turn the optimism and confidence in the Wehrmach has come back.

Parallel to the fighting, I improved the HQ and unit position during the last turns to maximise supply and reduce attrition to the precious trucks. The influence of the vehicle modifier depends massively of the distance between the supply receiver (usually the HQ) and the railhead. When the receiver is placed on the rail, even severe vehicle shortages barely have little or even now effect. But as you move away from the rail head, the vehicle modifier converges exponentially from above to the ratio vehicles in pool/required vehicles. So by placing the HQs correctly, I can avoid most effects the vehicle modifier has on supply.
During the first turns I was too careless with HQ and unit placement, an embarassing mistake as I am usually very interested in this topic.

Image.
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

With T9 the AAR caught up with the game, my opponent currently works on the Soviet T9. At the cost of some cliffhangers you will now get life reporting without hindsight from my side, which I think is more interesting than following a report from an all-knowing narrator.
Furthermore, retreating from the Caucasus and omitting the static situation at Kerch while reducing the area shown on the maps to the actual frontline hopefully improves the readability of this AAR. I know the images are a bit big but I really want to show MPs and CVs so the reader has a better picture of what are the options of each side and why something is done or not done.
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: Stand fast or manoeuvre? StB EvK (Axis) vs. Elma666(Soviets)

Post by Telemecus »

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist
Below you can see the suggestion of the German fine art colleges for a propaganda leaflet...
At least we know where the next replacement wave can be drawn from.

You may want to add those from the philological colleges who came up with Operation Nipple Removal!
ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist
I know the images are a bit big but I really want to show MPs and CVs so the reader has a better picture of what are the options of each side and why something is done or not done.

I think this is worthwhile and has not been done before. My take on it so far is that this is a "study" AAR rather than a casual read one. So readers will haev to make the extra effort here but the upside is a lot more understanding.

I have got used to using the Ctrl key with + and - for the first time with a browser to zoom in and out quickly - might be a useful tip for the reader. Also it helped to download the pictures to my hard disk and open them in a seperate image viewing programme while toggling back and forth between reading this in the browser. There may be some other suggestions too. As I said this one will take more work but is worth it.
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”