In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 41916
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Grotius

For now, I seem to have solved my map-orientation issues. I've slid stiff plexiglass underneath the maps, allowing me effectively to extend my table a few inches on each side. It seems pretty stable on the whole. I worry mostly about Honolulu, but in the event of seismic activity on the far east end of the map, I can temporarily relocate Nimitz and friends to a safe spot on the ocean floor. :)

Now to start setting up Global War, for solitaire play. This will bring up an even more heart-wrenching moral question: whether to clip the counters. I have my trusty Oregon counter-clippers (in smaller and larger sizes), but the thought of clipping thousands of counters makes my hand hurt. Also, these counters have side-sprues, which might make the need for clipping less acute. I will probably resolve this dilemma when I start setting up my first country.

Another question: which optionals? I know that's a huge topic, but if anyone has some quick thoughts on optionals for CE, I'm all ears. I play with most of the MWiF options; I usually don't play with Cruisers in Flames. I'm open to suggestions.

warspite1

If you are going to start a game you may want to check out the errata that's already started appearing....

https://www.a-d-g.com.au/pages/downloads
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 2810
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Joseignacio »

Well, my friends just received their deluxe. The game is nice but i was not impressed except for the map. The counters had the same size (i thought they were slightly bigger), the side-sprues may avoid the trimming but they may be a problem themselves (dunno because we didn't separate the counters yet, if they keep that little dot with them.

There were more full colour A3 combat tables. A separate reminder of the terrain cost apart from the one printed, the production circle and other auxiliary tables were also in cardboard...

Improvements, no doubt, but not as much as I thought they'd be, so my anxiety is calmed. [:D][:)]




Image
Attachments
20180513_173817.jpg
20180513_173817.jpg (218.67 KiB) Viewed 59 times
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Grotius »

If you are going to start a game you may want to check out the errata that's already started appearing....
Thanks, Warspite. Fortunately, it's a pretty short list of errata so far.
Improvements, no doubt, but not as much as I thought they'd be, so my anxiety is calmed.
LoL, I'm glad you're calmed! I've never owned the boardgame, so for me, this package is glorious. As you say, the maps are the best part. But the counters are quite beautiful too. I'm glad they're not larger, because that would require larger maps, heh. So far I've had pretty good look punching out the counters. Yes, a little side nub sometimes remains, but I've had success filing these down with my fingernail. I might use a nail-file to do a cleaner job of it. I'm inclined NOT to clip the counters, because the corners are clean, and the counters are already on the small side.

Much as I like MWIF, it's great to be able to look at the entire board in one glance, and not to have to zoom in or out or whatnot. Also, the physical map and counters are so darned colorful. Even the rule and scenario books are beautiful -- nicer than a PDF.

On optionals, the main issue I'm wrestling with is whether to use any of CLiF, Convoys in Flames, and Rough Seas. I know CLiF is very pro-Allied, and my games already lean toward the Allied side. Does CoIF rebalance the game toward the Axis? I hear Rough Seas does, but I'm not sure it sounds like a fun option to play with. Any advice on these optionals?
Image
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 27874
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Grotius

For now, I seem to have solved my map-orientation issues. I've slid stiff plexiglass underneath the maps, allowing me effectively to extend my table a few inches on each side. It seems pretty stable on the whole. I worry mostly about Honolulu, but in the event of seismic activity on the far east end of the map, I can temporarily relocate Nimitz and friends to a safe spot on the ocean floor. :)

Now to start setting up Global War, for solitaire play. This will bring up an even more heart-wrenching moral question: whether to clip the counters. I have my trusty Oregon counter-clippers (in smaller and larger sizes), but the thought of clipping thousands of counters makes my hand hurt. Also, these counters have side-sprues, which might make the need for clipping less acute. I will probably resolve this dilemma when I start setting up my first country.

Another question: which optionals? I know that's a huge topic, but if anyone has some quick thoughts on optionals for CE, I'm all ears. I play with most of the MWiF options; I usually don't play with Cruisers in Flames. I'm open to suggestions.

warspite1

If you are going to start a game you may want to check out the errata that's already started appearing....

https://www.a-d-g.com.au/pages/downloads
Noooooooooo! [:(]
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8362
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by paulderynck »

I don't know why people would want to play with Rough Seas. Are you out to simulate WWII with or without Admiral Halsey's typhoon? It's worthless chrome IMNSHO.
Paul
User avatar
BrianJH
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 2:22 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by BrianJH »

I'm starting light and easy, so I've setup the WiF Classic Barbarossa scenario.

This is a beautiful game.

Brian.

Image
Attachments
barbarossa small.jpg
barbarossa small.jpg (535.62 KiB) Viewed 61 times
davidachamberlain
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:12 am

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by davidachamberlain »

Thanks for the image.

However, I wonder about the counter colors.

It looks like USSR is Orange and Germany is Beige. I checked on 2 different machines/screens and still see that on both.

The map colors look normal - just the counters.

Dave
User avatar
BrianJH
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 2:22 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by BrianJH »

ORIGINAL: davidachamberlain

Thanks for the image.

However, I wonder about the counter colors.

It looks like USSR is Orange and Germany is Beige. I checked on 2 different machines/screens and still see that on both.

The map colors look normal - just the counters.

Dave

Yeah - I think the colors look washed out a bit due to the lack of lighting in my gaming room, as you'll notice that the left hand side of the photo is somewhat darker than the right hand side. Also, the Romanian counters that come with the game, are printed in a slightly lighter shade of grey, than the German counters, together all these effects are making them appear closer to CW counters.

Probably lost a bit of resolution as well, as I had to shrink the photo so it displays properly on this forum, the original was way too big!!

Brian
User avatar
juntoalmar
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:08 pm
Location: Valencia
Contact:

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by juntoalmar »

I have only played to MWiF and looking at your picture some things arise. For instance, the lack of land space for Finland in the map changes completely what you can do with the Finnish troops, right? I usually try to go around Ladoga lake and cut some train connections in MWiF, but that seems to be not possible here. Do you think your options are reduced with the physical map compared to MWiF?
(my humble blog about wargames, in spanish) http://cabezadepuente.blogspot.com.es/
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9016
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Centuur »

ORIGINAL: juntoalmar

I have only played to MWiF and looking at your picture some things arise. For instance, the lack of land space for Finland in the map changes completely what you can do with the Finnish troops, right? I usually try to go around Ladoga lake and cut some train connections in MWiF, but that seems to be not possible here. Do you think your options are reduced with the physical map compared to MWiF?

There is an optional Scandinavian map also present in the game. But to be honest, I like MWIF because it has the unified map...
Peter
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8362
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by paulderynck »

The off-map box rules have been revised in CE with the hope of being able to play the game quite effectively without the Scandinavian and Africa maps (and BTW the Territorials have been revised too which also lessens the need to use the Africa map).
Paul
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 27669
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: Centuur

ORIGINAL: juntoalmar

I have only played to MWiF and looking at your picture some things arise. For instance, the lack of land space for Finland in the map changes completely what you can do with the Finnish troops, right? I usually try to go around Ladoga lake and cut some train connections in MWiF, but that seems to be not possible here. Do you think your options are reduced with the physical map compared to MWiF?

There is an optional Scandinavian map also present in the game. But to be honest, I like MWIF because it has the unified map...
The whole dynamic with Finland and the USSR seems significantly different between WiF and MWiF. In WiF, as I see in the map above, there's not much room to maneuver (e.g., flank each other) and a lot fewer hexes to defend to protect Murmansk and Archangel. How does all that work in WiF? Does the map in MWiF make it too easy for the Germans to cut off Murmansk and flank the Soviets in the north?
Ronnie
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8362
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by paulderynck »

The short answer is Yes, but so did the Scandinavian map in WiF.
Paul
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 27669
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

The short answer is Yes, but so did the Scandinavian map in WiF.
Thanks. Also, without the Scandinavian map is appears much easier to keep your forces in supply moving between Murmansk and south through Karelin that it is in MWiF.
Ronnie
User avatar
toenailthehun
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:35 pm
Location: Sydney

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by toenailthehun »

I really miss being able to walk around that map.

I need a Wargame room first, before I invest in this monster.
Now which of the children currently occupy the room I need???
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 2810
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Joseignacio »

Yes, you can do things in the WIF game in the Finland area. Remember offmap hexes in the cardboard wargame can hold 4 units or 5 if playing with divs as long as at least one is a div.

No, it's not easy because of the difficulty to maneuver and because of supply.

There is some patch in the new map for that area. I don't like it either. I would prefer Scandinavia map, unfortunately this doesn't seem to be popular in my group.
Capitaine
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 10:00 am

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Capitaine »

My game arrived yesterday in all its glory. Still in shrinkwrap; unboxing will no doubt be an elaborate operation. But it looks like a beautiful product on the outside!
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by brian brian »

ORIGINAL: Grotius

On optionals, the main issue I'm wrestling with is whether to use any of CLiF, Convoys in Flames, and Rough Seas. I know CLiF is very pro-Allied, and my games already lean toward the Allied side. Does CoIF rebalance the game toward the Axis? I hear Rough Seas does, but I'm not sure it sounds like a fun option to play with. Any advice on these optionals?

I'm not sure you are going to get very many informed opinions on those questions. The entire ASW rule has been re-written and even the combat results system for Sub Combat has been changed in Collector's Edition. On top of that, the CoIF counters are different now too. I have no idea how the new rules will work out on those.

Since you are playing a new game with lots and lots of small new rules changes, I would start out by playing without any extra counters. There will be plenty to absorb without the extra kits.



WiF has always looked good with the colorful counters all over the map, particularly in the middle of the war with all of the countries active, but not yet the really high counter densities of the late war. I have always liked using the Minor Country Convoy Point counters, even thought we use the original rule of just using Major Power CP counters, because they look good on the map. (In other words, we totally ignore the Cooperation rule for Minor Convoy Points - silly).
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Grotius »

Thanks for your advice, Brian. You're right -- even the playtesters say they haven't played with the new CoIF counters. And I'm no guru on RAW7, to say nothing of RAW8, so it probably makes sense for me to simplify my workload for a first play. I do want to play with oil, and I fear CoIF would make oil more complex. So yeah, I've been setting up my first game without either CLiF or CoIF. I sorta look at all those pretty aux cruisers sadly as I put them in my "not this time" box, but there will be a next time.

I'm in the unusual position of playing the boardgame after having tested and played MWIF for 12 years. It's a very different experience, and it's not just the differing map. Just setting the game up has given me a more intuitive sense of how things fit together. For example, I now physically see a couple dozen force pools for each major power; in MWIF, I'd have to filter the force pools to do that, and I don't do that often. Already I have a clearer idea of what's in each pool, and what units I *didn't* draw when setting up. Also, without Steve's helpful guiding hand, I have to find things myself -- enforce the US trade agreements, for example. (Including one with Italy now; I don't recall that in MWIF.)

Anyway, setup for Global War is going smoothly so far. It took me a while to grok sorting counters and reading the setup charts, but now it seems easy. (I fired up MWIF to check some of my work.) I've done the USA and USSR; working on Italy now. Maybe I'll post an AAR somewhere. Half-tempted to post it in these forums, to give people a sense of the many differences between MWIF and CE.
Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: In case someone is interested on how WIF (no MWIF) is evolving...

Post by Grotius »

One mundane question: where do people typically keep the reserve pool? The game allocates a tiny little wedge of the production-wheel board for this pool, but that wedge is already brimming with Soviet reserves. I'm using counter trays for everything else (GMT & Plano); maybe I need one more just for the reserve pool?
Image
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”