Allied Intelligence in Japan

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by mind_messing »

I'll ask the forum here, as someone's likely to know too much about the issue for their own good:

Before the war, were there any Allied intelligence agents operating in Japan?

During the war, were there any Allied efforts to insert agents into Japan?

NB: When I refer to Japan, I mean the Japanese Home Islands and not Allied agents in China and elsewhere.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by crsutton »

Probably not an active presence during the war. But we had an embassy there up to the start of the war and embassies generally mean some sort of intelligence gathering. Before the militarist took over relations were good and that would have allowed more freedom to US agents. We knew where Japanese industrial plants were and what they were producing primarily because they were in place before the war. During the war we got some information from the Soviets who still had diplomatic relations and we were reading the Japanese diplomatic code.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by Lecivius »

From reading Silent Service, I know agents were dropped off on mainland Japan. I have never seen what they were about. Curiously, now that I think on it, I don't recall off the top of my head any mission to pick an agent up. Troops, and civvies caught up in the war etc., yes. But I don't recall seeing any agent pickup reports.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6395
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by JeffroK »

Hector Bywater, of the Great Pacific War fame, collected a lot of info on the IJN at least for British Naval Intel. Amongst his friends was Yamamato.

But someone has to believe his information.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

From reading Silent Service, I know agents were dropped off on mainland Japan. I have never seen what they were about. Curiously, now that I think on it, I don't recall off the top of my head any mission to pick an agent up. Troops, and civvies caught up in the war etc., yes. But I don't recall seeing any agent pickup reports.

What book is this, and can you elaborate on the nature of the missions?
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by Lecivius »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

From reading Silent Service, I know agents were dropped off on mainland Japan. I have never seen what they were about. Curiously, now that I think on it, I don't recall off the top of my head any mission to pick an agent up. Troops, and civvies caught up in the war etc., yes. But I don't recall seeing any agent pickup reports.

What book is this, and can you elaborate on the nature of the missions?


https://www.amazon.com/Silent-Service-U ... nt+service

Missions were to drop off agents, then proceed on a war patrol. While not common, they were not altogether uncommon. The book never described the agents mission, just the boat who dropped the agent.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
spence
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by spence »

Missions were to drop off agents, then proceed on a war patrol. While not common, they were not altogether uncommon. The book never described the agents mission, just the boat who dropped the agent.

Don't remember it very well but I recall an OLD flic where a submarine dropped off a couple of guys so that they could forward a weather report to Halsey's TF for the Doolittle Raid. The same sub retrieved the weather guys after their report/perhaps after the raid. I wouldn't be surprised if the flic had nothing to do with reality though it does portray a pick-up too.

From what I've read the racism of Americans combined with the homogenous society of the Japanese to make inserting any kind of agent very very difficult. Even Japanese who migrated to a Western country and subsequently returned to Japan were never really integrated back into Japanese society.
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by geofflambert »

Koreans.

User avatar
Macclan5
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:46 pm
Location: Toronto Canada

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by Macclan5 »


It depends upon your definition of Allied.

The USSR had various and many (according to speculation and KGB released files in recent years) spied in Japan in WW2.

Richard Sorge and Ozaki to name the most famous.

However they both had extensive networks never revealed nor prosecuted ; further the Imperial Government maintained high level diplomatic accord with the USSR through out the war hoping Stalin would mediate as the USA steamroller was occurring. Uncle Joe played coy till the very last even warning the Japanese of Allied raids on Formosa leading up to the the landings on Leyte. The USSR had much intelligence from diplomacy no doubt.

I am unfamiliar with intelligence assets on the western allied side - primarily American or British. Both had high level contacts leading up to the war and so would glean some Military intelligence prior to Pearl Harbor, Hong Kong, and Singapore.

If the IJN truly hid the existence of Yamato and Mushashi from the Allies till 1944 as often stated - this infers that American British intelligence was poor. Hard to hide Battleships that large 100% of the time
A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by MakeeLearn »

Many Allied spies outside of Japan, especially in the Philippines.




Claire Phillips

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 37884aa609

http://www.newsweek.com/honey-trap-clai ... war-639866

Image
Attachments
GettyImage..14977094.jpg
GettyImage..14977094.jpg (81.08 KiB) Viewed 270 times






User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by MakeeLearn »







User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19688
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Macclan5


It depends upon your definition of Allied.

The USSR had various and many (according to speculation and KGB released files in recent years) spied in Japan in WW2.

Richard Sorge and Ozaki to name the most famous.

However they both had extensive networks never revealed nor prosecuted ; further the Imperial Government maintained high level diplomatic accord with the USSR through out the war hoping Stalin would mediate as the USA steamroller was occurring. Uncle Joe played coy till the very last even warning the Japanese of Allied raids on Formosa leading up to the the landings on Leyte. The USSR had much intelligence from diplomacy no doubt.

I am unfamiliar with intelligence assets on the western allied side - primarily American or British. Both had high level contacts leading up to the war and so would glean some Military intelligence prior to Pearl Harbor, Hong Kong, and Singapore.

If the IJN truly hid the existence of Yamato and Mushashi from the Allies till 1944 as often stated - this infers that American British intelligence was poor. Hard to hide Battleships that large 100% of the time
The Japanese went to extraordinary lengths to hide the Yamato BB program.
1. Budgetary appropriations in the Diet referred to three Treaty sized 35,000 ton BBs and three 27,000 ton BCs ( the "Chibuchi class that would - in imagined design - have been similar to the US Alaska class CBs built in response to the Japanese appropriation).
2. The construction berths were shielded by a wall and ceiling of camouflage netting
3. Every component shipped in was well crated to disguise what it was
4. Every worker at the dockyard and major component manufacturer (like gun barrels) was sworn to secrecy on penalty of death
5 Every worker was investigated for security risks
6. Design work was done in the shipyard next to the construction site rather than in an engineering office elsewhere.

Once completed the war was already on and the BBs stayed in well protected anchorages - probably leaving at night for sea trials and working up beyond the area where fishing boats could see them. The first Allied aircraft to spot them could not get a good picture to estimate their size, but compared to escorting vessels the Allies knew they were bigger than most BBs.

A sub torpedoed Musashi once and doubtless made a report of a very large BB, but did not have a picture so the report may have been considered exaggeration.
I think the first clear pics of the Yamato and Musashi were during the Sibuyan Sea battle on day two of the Leyte Gulf naval battles.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Macclan5


It depends upon your definition of Allied.

The USSR had various and many (according to speculation and KGB released files in recent years) spied in Japan in WW2.

Richard Sorge and Ozaki to name the most famous.

However they both had extensive networks never revealed nor prosecuted ; further the Imperial Government maintained high level diplomatic accord with the USSR through out the war hoping Stalin would mediate as the USA steamroller was occurring. Uncle Joe played coy till the very last even warning the Japanese of Allied raids on Formosa leading up to the the landings on Leyte. The USSR had much intelligence from diplomacy no doubt.

I am unfamiliar with intelligence assets on the western allied side - primarily American or British. Both had high level contacts leading up to the war and so would glean some Military intelligence prior to Pearl Harbor, Hong Kong, and Singapore.

If the IJN truly hid the existence of Yamato and Mushashi from the Allies till 1944 as often stated - this infers that American British intelligence was poor. Hard to hide Battleships that large 100% of the time
The Japanese went to extraordinary lengths to hide the Yamato BB program.
1. Budgetary appropriations in the Diet referred to three Treaty sized 35,000 ton BBs and three 27,000 ton BCs ( the "Chibuchi class that would - in imagined design - have been similar to the US Alaska class CBs built in response to the Japanese appropriation).
2. The construction berths were shielded by a wall and ceiling of camouflage netting
3. Every component shipped in was well crated to disguise what it was
4. Every worker at the dockyard and major component manufacturer (like gun barrels) was sworn to secrecy on penalty of death
5 Every worker was investigated for security risks
6. Design work was done in the shipyard next to the construction site rather than in an engineering office elsewhere.

Once completed the war was already on and the BBs stayed in well protected anchorages - probably leaving at night for sea trials and working up beyond the area where fishing boats could see them. The first Allied aircraft to spot them could not get a good picture to estimate their size, but compared to escorting vessels the Allies knew they were bigger than most BBs.

A sub torpedoed Musashi once and doubtless made a report of a very large BB, but did not have a picture so the report may have been considered exaggeration.
I think the first clear pics of the Yamato and Musashi were during the Sibuyan Sea battle on day two of the Leyte Gulf naval battles.
Also, the 18" guns were referred to as 16" specials in documents.
User avatar
GI Jive
Posts: 173
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:53 pm

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by GI Jive »

Here is an article describing an OSS plan to insert Korean operatives into Japan using small semi-submersibles. It looks like the war ended before the plan was carried out. The concept was for agents to land, operate for several weeks ashore, then return to the semi-submersible to escape.

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for- ... arines.pdf
User avatar
GI Jive
Posts: 173
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:53 pm

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by GI Jive »

And another article from the CIA website states that in the lead-up to Operation Olympic: "Allied intelligence services had no effective agents or spy networks in the homeland, nor were there Western sympathizers with access to this kind of information in any detail."

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for- ... html#rtoc2
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19688
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: GI Jive

Here is an article describing an OSS plan to insert Korean operatives into Japan using small semi-submersibles. It looks like the war ended before the plan was carried out. The concept was for agents to land, operate for several weeks ashore, then return to the semi-submersible to escape.

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for- ... arines.pdf
What is a semi-submersible? A leaky rowboat made of balsa wood?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
spence
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by spence »

Drug smugglers have taken to using semi-submersibles to smuggle cocaine. Very small to no radar signature. The USCG has captured quite a few in the last few years.



Image
Attachments
semisubmersible.jpg
semisubmersible.jpg (42.78 KiB) Viewed 270 times
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by rustysi »

Well one thing occurred to give one an idea of the size of these behemoths. When Musashi was launched she caused a tsunami at her location.[X(] Of course no westerners were around to notice, at least none that I know of.
Drug smugglers have taken to using semi-submersibles to smuggle cocaine.

They've graduated to full on subs.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19688
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

Well one thing occurred to give one an idea of the size of these behemoths. When Musashi was launched she caused a tsunami at her location.[X(] Of course no westerners were around to notice, at least none that I know of.
Drug smugglers have taken to using semi-submersibles to smuggle cocaine.

They've graduated to full on subs.
I'm sure Putin would be happy to sell them his surplus diesel boats!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: Allied Intelligence in Japan

Post by MakeeLearn »

Many drugs have enter the US this way... Fort Bragg

LAPES - Low-Altitude Parachute Extraction System
Image
Attachments
1401906648173.jpg
1401906648173.jpg (185.8 KiB) Viewed 270 times






Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”