Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5060
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by Yaab »


Operational only in ETO. Learned about it just yesterday.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YB ... g_Fortress
User avatar
Grfin Zeppelin
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by Grfin Zeppelin »

Allied shenengians, in Germany it would have also required dive bombing capability. This is what this plane obviously lacked to be successfull

Regards
Hermann Göring

Image
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5060
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by Yaab »

For years I have believed that He-177 was a twin-engine bomber. I guess YB-40 must have its own secrets.
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by rustysi »

Known about them for a long time now. An attempt to turn some B-17's into gunships to escort deep raids. Not successful for various reasons.
in Germany it would have also required dive bombing capability.

Failure of being able to differentiate between a tactical and strategic air force.
For years I have believed that He-177 was a twin-engine bomber.

The result of trying to give a four engine strategic bomber a tactical capability. Better stated as a failure of doctrine.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
spence
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by spence »

The He-177?

I think that Goering/Udet destroyed its usefulness and delayed its deployment by demanding that it be capable of dive-bombing.

Wasn't its powerplant overly complicated by putting two engines in each engine nacelle and then having counter-rotating propellors. Was that arrangement necessary to get it to dive-bomb?
User avatar
tanksone
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:30 am
Location: St Paul, Mn.

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by tanksone »

And another what if...[:D]



Image
Attachments
FB_IMG_1505089890305.jpg
FB_IMG_1505089890305.jpg (36.7 KiB) Viewed 936 times
spence
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by spence »

A more aerodynamic nose arrangement of 8 x .50 cals on the PV-2D (only 30 or so delivered out of 500 ordered because the war ended).



Image
Attachments
PV_08.jpg
PV_08.jpg (187.55 KiB) Viewed 937 times
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by Reg »


Other B-17 field modifications.... [:)]

Image

The 20mm nose gun was ordered removed once the engineers got wind of it as the B-17 nose was not stressed for a weapon of this size. Supposedly the pilots couldn't read their instruments while the weapon was firing due to the vibrations. [X(]
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5060
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by Yaab »

Matches the reports of B-25 noses being damaged from gun vibrations.
Denniss
Posts: 8879
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Hannover (region)

RE: Boeing YB-40 Flying Fortress

Post by Denniss »

The dive bombing requirement excluded the use of 4 single engines - no wing would be able to cope with the stresses during recovery from dive.
Germany had no large engine powerful enough for such a big bomber (the Jumo 222 never materialized) so they had to couple two smaller engines.
This beast actually worked from late 43/early 44 after fixing many problems especially with the too tight engine installation.
WitE dev team - (aircraft data)
WitE 1.08+ dev team (data/scenario maintainer)
WitW dev team (aircraft data, partial data/scenario maintainer)
WitE2 dev team (aircraft data)
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”