Minesweeping without minesweepers

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by jwolf »

Well, I know the saying: any ship can be a minesweeper once. But some ships are specifically designed for this purpose. I admit I don't know how they do this; I assume they have some special equipment for the job. On the other hand, I've seen ordinary destroyers and DEs sweep mines as well. Granted, sometimes they do it the "hard way" but other times they really sweep up small numbers of mines without getting blown up.

Q: How do they do this, since they don't have (??) the kind of equipment a dedicated minesweeper has?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by witpqs »

It's my understanding that some (many?) destroyers did (no idea about currently) carry some equipment. I presume not as much/extensive/advanced as mine sweeping types. No idea about methods without specialized equipment.

In fact, I am struggling to recall some mention I heard of larger ships at some point being equipped with paravanes, but I can't quite recall where I read that reference. I think it was in the book Battleship at War about USS Washington but I am not certain about that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravane_(water_kite)#Military_applications

Google is yielding info. I'm sure there is much more to be found.
http://historylink101.com/ww2_navy/org/battleship/USSNewMexico/1716.html
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

My impression has always been they use small arms to detonate moored mines that are seen by lookouts. A lot of the water in the Pacific near islands is clear.
The Moose
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by witpqs »

Attachments
Dreadnough..072130.jpg
Dreadnough..072130.jpg (265.95 KiB) Viewed 111 times
User avatar
Panther Bait
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:59 pm

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by Panther Bait »

I believe that DDs and DEs had at least some of the equipment to do minesweeping (paravanes, etc.) but necessarily the training. Plus, DD/DEs were more useful elsewhere. So it might be said that minesweepers were less-capable DEs/patrol boats with some special equipment and training to do a better job at minesweeping, but not so specialized that other vessels couldn't do the task.

Also, many/most dedicated minesweepers had some protection from magnetic mines (substantially non-steel construction and/or degaussing) whereas obviously a DD/DE would not have the same protection.
When you shoot at a destroyer and miss, it's like hit'in a wildcat in the ass with a banjo.

Nathan Dogan, USS Gurnard
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Panther Bait

I believe that DDs and DEs had at least some of the equipment to do minesweeping (paravanes, etc.) but necessarily the training. Plus, DD/DEs were more useful elsewhere. So it might be said that minesweepers were less-capable DEs/patrol boats with some special equipment and training to do a better job at minesweeping, but not so specialized that other vessels couldn't do the task.

Also, many/most dedicated minesweepers had some protection from magnetic mines (substantially non-steel construction and/or degaussing) whereas obviously a DD/DE would not have the same protection.

The YMS minesweepers, over 500 of them, were wooden. I think at least some of the AMs were too. The DMS I believe were steel.

The problem with sticking paravanes on DDs and CLs and the rest is they are towed from the stern. The vessel has to run over the mine before the paravane comes into play. This is less of an issue with wooden minesweepers, although contact mines still work. Shallow draft in that case is life insurance.

Some modern minesweepers have booms to deploy paravanes off the beams to widen the channel and to give a bit more protection to the sweeper. Think shrimp-trawler-look. I'm again not sure if WWII sweepers used booms.
The Moose
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by inqistor »

I checked it years ago, but I think that any ship with Depth Charges can destroy mines. IIRC the exact quote is "destroy mines", not sweep, like minesweepers.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6397
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by JeffroK »

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.

Proper minesweeping was a skilled trade, look at the large number of Allied small ships designed and their crews trained for that purpose.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by fcooke »

Actually paravanes were streamed from the bow. In almost every Malta convoy a number of DDs would lead the convoy and the nature of the paravanes would cause them to move away from the ship, and the cables would cut mooring lines and then the crew could destroy the now floating mine by rifle or machine gun fire. Off the top of my head (and someone with more knowledge here will show the paucity of my recall skills), I cannot think of an instance where a paravane DD hit a mine on the Malta runs.
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: fcooke

Actually paravanes were streamed from the bow. In almost every Malta convoy a number of DDs would lead the convoy and the nature of the paravanes would cause them to move away from the ship, and the cables would cut mooring lines and then the crew could destroy the now floating mine by rifle or machine gun fire. Off the top of my head (and someone with more knowledge here will show the paucity of my recall skills), I cannot think of an instance where a paravane DD hit a mine on the Malta runs.

From what I can find quickly, it appears the RN and the USN might have differed in the location of the paravanes. I found sites that asserted that the DMSes (converted WWI DDs mostly) had stern paravanes in place of DC racks. The stability and performance characteristics made that work as the paravanes needed winches and other gear that was heavy and worked best at the stern. I don't know where the American wooden minesweepers had their sweep gear. The bow makes more safety sense as you say, but there's limited room up there if the ship is going to have any sea-keeping at all.

I can see how vanes could force the body out to the beams to cut cables, but what about contact mines directly in front of the ship? I guess after there was one clear lane you could drive down it and sweep into an adjacent lane on either side. But that first pass to make the cut-in must have been no fun.
The Moose
Aurorus
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 5:08 pm

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by Aurorus »

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.

Proper minesweeping was a skilled trade, look at the large number of Allied small ships designed and their crews trained for that purpose.

I cleared a mine with the CA Mogami in my current game. Unfortunately the mine detonated the magazine and Mogami is no more. But it was one less mine that I had to contend with.
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by rustysi »

ORIGINAL: Aurorus

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.

Proper minesweeping was a skilled trade, look at the large number of Allied small ships designed and their crews trained for that purpose.

I cleared a mine with the CA Mogami in my current game. Unfortunately the mine detonated the magazine and Mogami is no more. But it was one less mine that I had to contend with.

Not quite the preferred method.[:-]
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by fcooke »

Good points Moose. The Med was a 'relatively' calm body of water, and I don't recall ever reading about Pacific USN DDs using the equipment at all. But if you were going to use paravanes to clear mines, wooden hulls would be better, and as little beam on the ship as possible.....
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19745
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Minesweeping without minesweepers

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: fcooke

Good points Moose. The Med was a 'relatively' calm body of water, and I don't recall ever reading about Pacific USN DDs using the equipment at all. But if you were going to use paravanes to clear mines, wooden hulls would be better, and as little beam on the ship as possible.....
MSs have to be relatively tubby little vessels so that the sweep booms they extend do not smack the water too much in a roll.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”