The Last Stand

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
altipueri
Posts: 1003
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:09 am

RE: The Last Stand

Post by altipueri »

George MacDonald Fraser places his fictional anti-hero, Flashman at the battle in the book Flashman and the Redskins. Flashman survives the battle thanks to an Oglala Indian girl (Walking Blanket Woman) who takes pity on him in her eagerness to join the main battle, and to his illegitimate son, Frank Standing Bear, who had grown up among the Sioux.

Flashman elsewhere comments that the Battle of the Little Big Horn is more proof that any sane person should run the other way from any military action where the Irish tune Garryowen is played beforehand. The drinking song was also popular among British soldiers at the Charge of the Light Brigade, which he also survived, barely.
User avatar
Blond_Knight
Posts: 998
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 3:52 am

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Blond_Knight »

ORIGINAL: c unit
ORIGINAL: Blond_Knight

Has anyone tried the HPS game Desperate Glory about Custer and the Battle of the 'Greasy Grass', as the Lakota like to call it?
HPS Desperate Glory

I have the game and it is fun despite its issues. The good: easy to pick up and play, small AO and unit count (may or may not be good depending on your preferences), and variables to battle setup (Custer brings along 2nd CAV, Custer doesn't divide command, number of Sioux, etc.). The bad: the biggest issue with the game is the Sioux AI. It is rather easy to win as the 7th, just have Reno's battalion press the attack and get Custer's battalion across the Medicine Tail Coulee and attacking settlements ASAP. The Sioux forces will eventually retreat and you'll win. The Sioux AI breaks far too easily, if it pressed the attack it'd win (I played against all three AI settings: balanced, aggressive, and cautious). The game doesn't include the second day of fighting either. Playing as the Sioux becomes a game of how few warriors you can loose in the process of wiping out the 7th; very easy to loose as Sioux, but that requires changing variables all in Custer's favor and lowering your own numbers, 500 is the smallest and 2000 the largest. Overall, I'd suggest at least trying the demo. I consider myself knowledgeable on the topic and think if you're like me, you'll enjoy it; not a lot of Little Bighorn wargames out there.

That's some good info. Thanks I'll check it out.
Ranger33
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:19 pm

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Ranger33 »

Wow, you guys are very knowledgeable about this battle. Interesting stuff!

I had the opportunity to see the actual battlefield a few years ago, and it was well worth spending an afternoon there. When you look at where the US forces approached from, and where the camp was, it's easy to see how they could not have known what they were up against until the last moment. You can tour the entire area and see the markers showing where each body was found. Pretty sobering to see three or four in a low spot and just imagine them living out their final moments there. It's also interesting how the other companies weren't that far from Custer, but they couldn't see each other due to the terrain. The whole thing highlights how critical battlefield communication is, and how combat of that century could be such a mess when different units were out of sight from each other.
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13846
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Curtis Lemay »

Today being Elvis's birthday, I'm reminded of the contrast between his ignominious death (straining on the pot triggered a heart attack) and Custer's glorious one (died with his boots on in an immortal last stand).

Regardless of how Custer's tactical decisions are judged by history, on the spectrum of deaths, the range has to be from Elvis (at the bottom) to Custer very near the top (with perhaps only the defenders of the Alamo and Thermopylae topping him).
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Hexagon
Posts: 1113
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:36 am

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Hexagon »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

Today being Elvis's birthday, I'm reminded of the contrast between his ignominious death (straining on the pot triggered a heart attack) and Custer's glorious one (died with his boots on in an immortal last stand).

Regardless of how Custer's tactical decisions are judged by history, on the spectrum of deaths, the range has to be from Elvis (at the bottom) to Custer very near the top (with perhaps only the defenders of the Alamo and Thermopylae topping him).

At least Elvis dont suicide with men that were under their command... Custers death for me was more shameless in the moment cost the life of his men i think they prefer Custer died on his pot and they have in command a more competent commander that think first on their men and not in his glory.
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13846
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: Hexagon

At least Elvis dont suicide with men that were under their command... Custers death for me was more shameless in the moment cost the life of his men i think they prefer Custer died on his pot and they have in command a more competent commander that think first on their men and not in his glory.

The worst kind of historical analysis: Use perfect 20:20 hindsight to "predict" the outcome of a battle. Then castigate the participants for not reaching that conclusion in advance.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Hotschi
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: Austria

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Hotschi »

Comparing the deaths of General Custer and Rock-Star Elvis Presley is comparing apples with oranges.
"A big butcher's bill is not necessarily evidence of good tactics"

- Wavell's reply to Churchill, after the latter complained about faint-heartedness, as he discovered that British casualties in the evacuation from Somaliland had been only 260 men.
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13846
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: Hotschi

Comparing the deaths of General Custer and Rock-Star Elvis Presley is comparing apples with oranges.

They are exactly the same in that we're all humans and we're all going to die eventually. Our deaths can range from ignominious to glorious.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Yogi the Great
Posts: 1949
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Yogi the Great »

I've been to Little Big Horn Battlefield as well. I think one of the more interesting things about it is that the Indian Victory actually would lead to their loss and removal. Because of the "fame" of Custer and the information (perhaps much of it false or made up) and resulting public opinion the U.S. government tasked the Military with the final removal and defeat of the tribes in the area. One of those historic ironies of a great victory leading to total defeat. Another factor of the area history and resulting battles of course was past dishonoring of treaties and in no small part affected by the finding of Gold in the area and the rush of the "white men" to get it.
Hooked Since AH Gettysburg
User avatar
Blond_Knight
Posts: 998
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 3:52 am

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Blond_Knight »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: Hotschi

Comparing the deaths of General Custer and Rock-Star Elvis Presley is comparing apples with oranges.

They are exactly the same in that we're all humans and we're all going to die eventually. Our deaths can range from ignominious to glorious.

Well if you invade someones home you deserve a violent death. Though I wouldnt call that glorious.
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13846
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: Blond_Knight

Well if you invade someones home you deserve a violent death. Though I wouldnt call that glorious.

Hmm. Let's see if I've got this straight: The US Cavalry, operating in the US State of Montana against hostile savages, deserved to die.

I guess that means that the Union forces, invading the Confederacy, deserved to die. The Allied armies, invading Germany in 1945, deserved to die. US forces, invading Afghanistan, deserved to die, etc.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 27747
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Orm »

operating in the US State of Montana
Montana become a state 1889. More than ten years after the events discussed.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
User avatar
OttoVonBlotto
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:44 pm

RE: The Last Stand

Post by OttoVonBlotto »

hostile savages [:-]
"Personal isn't the same as important"
User avatar
wings7
Posts: 4586
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:59 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

RE: The Last Stand

Post by wings7 »

ORIGINAL: Orm
operating in the US State of Montana
Montana become a state 1889. More than ten years after the events discussed.

Territory of Montana, 1864 to 1889...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Territory
Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 27747
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: wings7

ORIGINAL: Orm
operating in the US State of Montana
Montana become a state 1889. More than ten years after the events discussed.

Territory of Montana, 1864 to 1889...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Territory
I am a little confused by this. The link only proves that Montana was not yet a state and that was exactly what I said.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
User avatar
Toby42
Posts: 1629
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 11:34 pm
Location: Central Florida

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Toby42 »

ORIGINAL: Blond_Knight

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: Hotschi

Comparing the deaths of General Custer and Rock-Star Elvis Presley is comparing apples with oranges.

They are exactly the same in that we're all humans and we're all going to die eventually. Our deaths can range from ignominious to glorious.

Well if you invade someones home you deserve a violent death. Though I wouldnt call that glorious.

No, it was called :Manifest Destiny" at the time?
Tony
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13846
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: Orm
operating in the US State of Montana
Montana become a state 1889. More than ten years after the events discussed.

OK, so it was the US Territory of Montana at the time. So what?
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
wings7
Posts: 4586
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:59 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

RE: The Last Stand

Post by wings7 »

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: wings7

ORIGINAL: Orm


Montana become a state 1889. More than ten years after the events discussed.

Territory of Montana, 1864 to 1889...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Territory
I am a little confused by this. The link only proves that Montana was not yet a state and that was exactly what I said.

Read this...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organized ... ted_States
Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Lecivius »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: Blond_Knight

Well if you invade someones home you deserve a violent death. Though I wouldnt call that glorious.

Hmm. Let's see if I've got this straight: The US Cavalry, operating in the US State of Montana against hostile savages, deserved to die.

I guess that means that the Union forces, invading the Confederacy, deserved to die. The Allied armies, invading Germany in 1945, deserved to die. US forces, invading Afghanistan, deserved to die, etc.


One needs to keep perspective...

Union forces, invading the Confederacy, defeated the standing army.

Allied armies, invading Germany in 1945, defeated the standing army.

US forces, invading Afghanistan, defeated the standing army.

However...

European forces, coming to the American continent, engaged in active genocide for land. The 7th cavalry, in most of it's operations, was no different than the Conquistadors, or Fetterman, or Chivington. If the tribes had not had so much distrust of each other, I dear say history would have been a little different. The end result would probably have remained the same, but there would have been a lot more history.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 27747
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: The Last Stand

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: wings7

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: wings7




Territory of Montana, 1864 to 1889...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Territory
I am a little confused by this. The link only proves that Montana was not yet a state and that was exactly what I said.

Read this...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organized ... ted_States
I already did read it. And it doesn't change fact one bit.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”