I need Help - AI Testing
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
To the best of my knowledge, no. Considering what I was experiencing, I assumed ( NEVER do that! [;)] ) he had jumped them up to 99 EXP or something. Maybe I just got hit in the butt with a banjo?
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
12/30/41
The 3 Australian Div is loading for PM with a x2 CV TF as escort. Iron man is just now landing on Rabaul. I'm anxious to see if this version will handle PM differently. He never went overland from Buna, instead using countless smaller amphib assaults....
The 3 Australian Div is loading for PM with a x2 CV TF as escort. Iron man is just now landing on Rabaul. I'm anxious to see if this version will handle PM differently. He never went overland from Buna, instead using countless smaller amphib assaults....
Col. Mussbu
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
My scen 33 show that three Beaufighters(id 60,165,166) and Hurricane IV (id 86) are now flagged as attack bombers. All four are classified as level bombers. Is this WAD?
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Interestingly I destroyed a x2 AK TF 7 hexes west off Benkoelen. 1/13/42. While neither Sumatra nor Java has been invaded... Not sure where it was headed...
Col. Mussbu
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
2/3/42
11 Jap XX captured Owen Stanley from Buna. I already have 3 Aus XX, Lark Bn, 30 X, etc at PM in case it moves here.
On another note, Ironman has not provided air CAP over this area and my x2 CV was able to launch a damaging launch against Trans/Amphib TF's at Buna, Salm, and Lae against 0 Jap CAP. In several days I'll be sending P-39 sqdn to PM while several others are still training in Oz.
I'm curious (but dubious) if the editor can create mixed squadrons of Zero/Betty units? Say x5 Zero's/x15 Bettys so that AI has Escorts? Or a way to have dedicated paired sqns of the same? Several months ago Andy was thinking of either extending the range of one or the other to help AI provide better escort coverage, not sure how he's faring on this...
11 Jap XX captured Owen Stanley from Buna. I already have 3 Aus XX, Lark Bn, 30 X, etc at PM in case it moves here.
On another note, Ironman has not provided air CAP over this area and my x2 CV was able to launch a damaging launch against Trans/Amphib TF's at Buna, Salm, and Lae against 0 Jap CAP. In several days I'll be sending P-39 sqdn to PM while several others are still training in Oz.
I'm curious (but dubious) if the editor can create mixed squadrons of Zero/Betty units? Say x5 Zero's/x15 Bettys so that AI has Escorts? Or a way to have dedicated paired sqns of the same? Several months ago Andy was thinking of either extending the range of one or the other to help AI provide better escort coverage, not sure how he's faring on this...
Col. Mussbu
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 5:12 am
RE: Tier 3 Ironman
Scenario 103 Nasty, I'm in mid January and Japan attacked the Soviet Union. Is this working as intended? I would prefer a soviet inactive scenario as it is hard enough to deal with the naval aspects of the game.
Great game. I find the regular Ironman a bit dull now. The challenge of the nasty tier 3 is greatly appreciated.
Great game. I find the regular Ironman a bit dull now. The challenge of the nasty tier 3 is greatly appreciated.
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
ORIGINAL: Andy Mac
Weird this is the latest with the working version of script 2 still testing it myself but just in case it helps
ps I have said it before I really recmmmend helping the allies a bit in these scens (a large selection of ironman Allied Naval and Air units as well as aircraft have been left IN the scen files but disabled to make it easier to add in.
I play on 4 day turns un less something important is happening and I recently was in deep crap by Oct 42 v this script with a few extra allied toys.....
I'm trying it
tracker is running, but it gives these warnings:
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Those are aircraft in convoys .. don't worry about that warning ... perfectly normal for an ironman game.
Pax
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
and this?
I don't remember so shortage of resources for allied with stock scenarios, particularly I don't remember resources shortage at Seattle, Los Angeles and San Francisco, but now maybe the first time I use tracker for starting turns
I don't remember so shortage of resources for allied with stock scenarios, particularly I don't remember resources shortage at Seattle, Los Angeles and San Francisco, but now maybe the first time I use tracker for starting turns
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Typical in the first week of the grand campaign. Before the first big weekly push moves lots of stuff everywhere, you will see a plethora of such messages.
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Thanks, so I'll can carry on this scenario, only five turns played, but it's really enjoyable this ironman tier 3
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Thanks all for the feedback struggling with PC issue at present.
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Thanks much aprciated
ORIGINAL: JoV
Hi Andy, I've been lurking in here for a while hoping to see an updated version of the scenarios in the first post, but if you are still looking for feedback I will start up a game playing as Japan in Scen 1 and hope to be able to provide some feedback as I (slowly) get along.
Cheers for all the work [&o]
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
XP and a little speed.....
ORIGINAL: Lecivius
Having gotten to '43, I can say no serious bugs found. I don't want to post much, for fear of ruining other peoples fun. And make no mistake, this IS the most fun for AI I have found in any WITP game.
One observation is the Rufe. As you note, you didn't change it. But I do think there may be more to it under the hood that is realized. And since it has limited exposure in other scenarios, perhaps no one has noticed. I have not flipped to look at the Japanese OOB, because I want the entire thing to stay as a surprise. So these guys may have been given 99 EXP or something. But I have seen over Lunga a group of 20 Rufes on CAP at 6000 ft climb above 11 B-17E's with @ 61 EXP at 35000 ft with 6 minutes warning, dive, and shoot every one of them down (August 8 1942). That was hard to take, especially since that is above the ceiling of a Rufe, and beyond their climb rate. I have seen 42 Rufes over Milne Bay intercept an alpha strike made by 5 carriers (Dec 25 1942), including 86 F4F-4's on Escort trained to @ 69 EXP on average, and literally gut the entire package (losses were around 40 to 1). That's a tough pill to swallow [X(] Everything else I can handle, but the Rufe, and how it performs in this game, is more like a MiG-25 [:-]
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Na just keep sailing........ [:D]
ORIGINAL: mussey
One more before I go...
on 12/9: johnston raided, KB sits 6 hexes to the north of it on 12/10 about 25 hexes due east of my CV forces raiding Wake invasion...
- Lex/Enter CV's launch air attack vs Jap invasion of Wake, 15 Rufe's vs 20 Buff/wildcats/34 SBD's, most Rufes shot down, many jap ships hit, but Wake is captured! I think I'll try to exit the area west of the Marshall's to evade the oncoming KB!!! Am I trapped?...[X(]
RE: Tier 3 Ironman
Yes working as intended I did have a second script that didnt have that attack but it was lost in my comp meltdown I think
ORIGINAL: joliverlay
Scenario 103 Nasty, I'm in mid January and Japan attacked the Soviet Union. Is this working as intended? I would prefer a soviet inactive scenario as it is hard enough to deal with the naval aspects of the game.
Great game. I find the regular Ironman a bit dull now. The challenge of the nasty tier 3 is greatly appreciated.
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Yes intentional I classified them as attack bombers as the code handles them better IMO as attack bombers than FB's
Andy
Andy
ORIGINAL: Yaab
My scen 33 show that three Beaufighters(id 60,165,166) and Hurricane IV (id 86) are now flagged as attack bombers. All four are classified as level bombers. Is this WAD?
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Thanks to everyone who has posted some feedback
RE: I need Help - AI Testing
Andy, I'm locked into what you're trying to accomplish. I'll play test anything you put forth.ORIGINAL: Andy Mac
Thanks to everyone who has posted some feedback
Col. Mussbu
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
The long arm of the law - "The King of Battle"
RE: Tier 3 Ironman
ORIGINAL: Andy Mac
I think I have the new Scen1 AI more or less done for Japan going to start work on Allied scen 1 AI next so I have a complete new baseline
I haven't understood, is scenario 1 in first post of this thread playable as Japan side?