LST vs. IdahoNYer (DBB-C, A AAR) 6 yrs and done! VJ Day!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: 20-21 Jan 43

Post by jwolf »

apparently the ground troops were able to move inland just prior to the ships opening up.

How is this possible when ground movement takes place much later in the turn? [&:]
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 20-21 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: jwolf
apparently the ground troops were able to move inland just prior to the ships opening up.

How is this possible when ground movement takes place much later in the turn? [&:]

Great question - I have no idea....probably my troops moved out in the turn prior... We're doing two day turns.

jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: 20-21 Jan 43

Post by jwolf »

Oh yes, forgot about that. That explanation makes sense. May or may not be right, but it makes sense. [;)]
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: 20-21 Jan 43

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

how is your supply situation in Burma? I think you are both committing significant forces, I think last time I saw, ~10 divisions each side
are you able to supply properly outside roads/ bases?
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 20-21 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

how is your supply situation in Burma? I think you are both committing significant forces, I think last time I saw, ~10 divisions each side
are you able to supply properly outside roads/ bases?

So far, more than acceptable. That said, I haven't really tried to push much beyond the India-Burma border. Wazurup is lacking supply, but that's understandable.

User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

22-23 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

22-23 Jan 43

Highlights – Staying pretty quiet as Amph TFs move to targets

Jpn ships sunk:
ACM: 1
SSX: 4

Jpn ships unsunk:
BB: 1 (Kirishima – blast!!!)
SS: 1 (I-35)

Allied ships sunk: None

Air loss:
Jpn: 23
Allied: 17

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 4 Attacks, 3 ship hit (PB and APDs Namikaze and Kamikaze dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: KB location unknown – aerial mining of Koepang failed to produce any CAP – so KB isn’t likely there.

West Coast/Admin: Fast convoy departs LA for Auck; CVE TF arrives at Bremerton and awaits BB Pensy’s refit completion in a few days.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, US subs Scorpion and Salmon each intercept convoy heading south from Truk and both manage to hit escorting APDs – but fail to penetrate and engage AKs.

In SOPAC, US CV TFs and CA TF rendezvous with the Lunga Amph TF 240m SW of Noumea and will turn north toward Lunga once entering the Coral Sea. CV Yorktown departed Sydney with 5DDs and should link up next turn. Plan is to keep the CVs SE of Lunga to support the landings – with Munda currently closed, the most dangerous threat of course is the appearance of the KB, while the most likely is the marauding subs in the area. B-24s hit Shortlands with good effect, reportedly sinking four SSXs in port. No CAP. Munda hit by B-17s with minimal effect, also no CAP. Supplies sufficiently built up at Kirakira and Ndeni to support landings.

In SWPAC, its quiet. Gove Amph TF will depart Portland Roads next turn and head back to Groote to stage. Although I don’t know where the KB is right now – it can’t interdict both the Lunga and Gove landings. With Groote AF at level 2, LBA will provide the CAP – enough probably to protect the landings from Darwin based LBA, but not enough if the KB shows up. Fingers crossed…

In WAUS, IJA LBA (Sallys/Oscar IIb) hits the Aus ground forces west of Port Hedland and do well against LRCAP from Exmouth. 5 F4F and 4 P-40E lost in exchange of 3 Oscar IIb. Will send in P-39s and Aussie Kittyhawks next turn to see if they can do better. Once Gove landings done, will move a squadron of P-38Gs to WAUS as well as some bombers to perhaps hit Broome. Main body of 41st Div has yet to be hit by IJA air, and continues to move slowly east, protected by two AA Bns. What L_S_T has shown me is that not only Port Hedland AF needs to be shut down, but Broome as well in order to successfully attack Port Hedland overland.

In China, the Lanchow Air Force, all three P-66 Vanguards, take to the air and intercept unescorted Lillys in ground support – knocking down 11 for no loss. Its just a pin prick, but it might divert some fighters from elsewhere. On that note, Chungking is swept by Tojos, but the P-40s remain at Kweilang.

In India/Burma, stays quiet as the Allied AF rests. Air recon has reported 397 fighters based at Magwe!!! I know L_S_T likes to mass forces, but this is ridiculous!
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: 22-23 Jan 43

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

Air recon has reported 397 fighters based at Magwe!!! I know L_S_T likes to mass forces, but this is ridiculous!


this might be unavoidable for a Japanese player that wants to keep the oil flowing to Rangoon... maybe you should focus on this base instead? if the port is destroyed, then the oil will remain useless
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19745
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 22-23 Jan 43

Post by BBfanboy »

Magwe is an inland base in Burma - no port to destroy.
Since the Japanese can produce nearly unlimited fighters the Allies have to be somewhat careful with where they seek A2A combat. Numbers count in air battles.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: 22-23 Jan 43

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

I meant Rangoon; Rangoon is Magwe's natural port. If it's destroyed then Japan cannot get the oil. By attacking it Japan is forced to split its defenses
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19745
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 22-23 Jan 43

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

I meant Rangoon; Rangoon is Magwe's natural port. If it's destroyed then Japan cannot get the oil. By attacking it Japan is forced to split its defenses
OK, now I get your drift. The rail line goes all the way to Moulmein so he could ship out of there too if he builds the port to max.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 22-23 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

Rangoon is on the list of targets, but well beyond my capability in Jan '43. I'm still far too short airframes to be very aggressive in the air - that won't change until mid '43, right?

Till then, I have to be fairly cautious, especially with the British Air Arm. I'll keep pushing additional US fighter squadrons to Burma, and eventually get the edge...I hope..
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

24-25 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

24-25 Jan 43

Highlights – Last pretty quiet turn for a bit as most of the Allied air forces rest

Jpn ships sunk: (all old)
SS: 1 ((I-164)
xAKL: 1
ACM: 1

Jpn ships unsunk:
SS: 1 (RO-67)

Allied ships sunk:
xAKL: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 18
Allied: 22

Subwar:
Jpn: 2 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAKL sunk)
Allies: 1 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAK dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin: On the admin side, I finally think I’ve managed to work through the various upgrades to get the USMC recon squadrons squared away. This was a chore I’ve been working through for weeks of game time – the problem was trying to ensure USMC squadrons didn’t “dead end” due to PDU-OFF limitations, and were able to get the best a/c possible. I realized a while back that to upgrade the various USMC squadrons there weren’t enough a/c to upgrade by squadrons, they had to be broken down to the sub units, and then upgraded separately. Just glad I discovered that early on. So, this is what I came up with as near as optimum USMC recon capabilities with PDU-OFF:
VMO-155: F4F-7
VMD-154: PB4Y-1 (had to disband 1/3 of the squadron, which will return in Jun)
VMD-254: PB4Y-1 (had to disband 2/3 of the squadron, which will return in May)
VMF-111: F4F-3P
VMO-251: F4F-3P (Stateside - two a/c in squadron, to be used as trainers)
VMF-216: F4F-4 (Stateside - 8 planes to use as trainers to gain experience with LRCAP flights)

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, US CV TFs, CA TF and Lunga Amph TF all link up in Coral Sea and will move to loiter just SE of Rennel Is – then move to target. So far, they haven’t been located by search. CV Yorktown still trailing behind, also should link up. Air support rests, and supplies have been brought up to good levels at supporting bases. Now if the subs will stay away and the KB remains somewhere far away.

In SWPAC, its quiet. Gove Amph TF just SE of Groote Eylandt is spotted by a sub, which is heavily depth charged. Hopefully L_S_T will think its just a reinforcement of Groote. That said, the Amph TF will head to Gove next turn, with a CL TF heading out of Portland Roads to provide cover. Groote will provide LRCAP with a P-400 and F4F-4 squadron, and P-38Gs out of Merauke. Meanwhile, PBYs sight two IJN TFs SE of Koepang, heading east. The PBYs report a single CL and a pair of DDs – I’m taking this to be the usual CL TF with DDs to disrupt shipping near Groote – if it’s something bigger….I’d rather not think about it…

In WAUS, IJA LBA (Sallys/Oscar IIb) continue to hit the Aussie ground forces with moderate effect. The LRCAP of P-39s and Kittyhawks do a little better, downing 3 Oscar IIb and a Sally in exchange for 4ea Allied fighters – still not good, and no where close to provide adequate cover. So, I’ve pulled a P-38F squadron west to Meekatharra to provide some more robust LRCAP. Lastly, a squadron of P-38Gs (6 planes) is loaded and departed on a Cape Town based convoy, headed to India.

In China, the much vaunted three plane Lanchow Air Force on LRCAP disrupted unescorted Sonia ground attacks NW of Kienko, downing 4 Sonias for no loss. Just to keep the IJA Air honest! These little CAP traps provide some, albeit minor, diversion to the usual bad news in the China Theater.

In India/Burma, stays quiet as the Allied AF rests.
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: 24-25 Jan 43

Post by jwolf »

Now if the subs will stay away and the KB remains somewhere far away.

Is KB still operating in the area between Timor and Australia? Or do you know where it is?

Hmmm, you said "last pretty quiet turn for a bit" and an invasion is apparently in the works in the Solomons area and/or New Guineau. I'm guessing this is a lot more than a quick probe. [8D] Good luck!
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 24-25 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

No clue where the KB is jwolf -- figured it went to Koepang to take fuel, but that's a guess.

and yes, two separate Allied invasions are imminent, it will get busy...fingers crossed!
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

26-27 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

26-27 Jan 43

Highlights – Landing on Gove with the entire IJN fleet 40m away!

Jpn ships sunk:
SS: 2 (RO-33, RO-60)
xAP: 1
SSX: 1

Allied ships sunk:
AG: 1 (small)

Air loss:
Jpn: 72
Allied: 53

Subwar:
Jpn: 4 Attacks, 1 ship hit (AG sunk by SSX)
Allies: 7 Attacks, 2 ship hit (xAP sunk, AK dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv:
Gove (SWPAC)

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: KB and much of the IJN fleet appears just 40m west of Gove! Did get a SIGINT hit on an IJN warship for the FIRST TIME since early Dec 41: “CA Aoba is moving to 86,130” – smack in the middle of the Gulf of Carpentaria.

West Coast/Admin: NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, majority of the US fleet links up in the Coral Sea and moves to stage just SE of the reef south of Rennel Island prior to the run in to Lunga. At least two IJN subs are hit by a/c – from the half dozen sighted in the area. Fingers crossed that we can keep the subs at bay. TFs will begin run to Lunga next turn, with the CVs remaining south of Rennel to provide distant cover – Kirakira based LRCAP will provide most of the cover for the landings – less the P-38G squadron and the Hornet’s F4Fs, which were just sent to SWPAC. With the IJN fleet now identified off Gove, there “should be” no real threat to the Lunga landings.

In SWPAC, So much for quiet…the CL and 2DDs sighted last turn in the Timor Sea turns out to be the entire IJN Fleet – and it winds up just west of Gove! Luck is with me as the KB puts up just one airstrike against the Amph TF (CL, 6DD, 2APD, 2AM, 2AP, 2xAP, 4AK) and CL TF (2CL, 4DD) – and hits NOTHING (Synch bug showed much, much worse results!!, Boy was I relieved when I opened the turn file!). Amazingly the Amph TF also stays the course and lands the majority of the troops (combat troops anyway) at Gove – troops landed are C/32nd ID, Aussie Tank Reg and Cbt Eng Bn and a US Air Advn BF. The defenders appear to be about 400 men of an SNLF. The usual USAAF airstrikes on these troops are heavily intercepted by KB Zeros and both sides suffer heavy losses: 20Z vs. 4 P-400, 3 P-38G, 3 F4F, 4 B-17F. The LONE US airstrike against the KB was slaughtered – 14 of 18 USMC TBFs shot down by a 80+ Zero CAP. In any case, now it gets dicey. With the entire IJN in the adjacent hex, the Allied ships will scatter, and head for ports – Merauke, Horn, and Normanton for most of the transports, but also Portland Roads and other ports in NE Australia – not just for the invasion shipping, but all shipping in the area (which there are a goodly amount right now). Each transport will largely have a single DD as escort, the CL TF will sail intact for Horn. One xAP along with an AM will stay at Gove to offload some more troops. An xAK and SC will attempt to complete offloading at Groote Eylandt. I realize this is a longshot to get some of these ships out of harm’s way – and the ports aren’t really “safe”. The KB is fully capable of overwhelming CAP at any of these ports – that said, I’ve maxed CAP over Horn Island (100+), but also need to cover Merauke, Normanton, and Portland Roads. Groote Eylandt is left naked of fighters, just AA, as is Coen (B-17 base) – gotta take risk somewhere. Despite the massive looming threat, there are some positives here. First – knowing that the KB is here means the Lunga landings in SOPAC should go smoothly. Also, troops ARE ashore at Gove, and they should be able to take the base in the first assault. Also, that SIGINT hit of the CA Aoba heading to hex 86, 130 could work out well – I’ve focused 4 subs to that hex, and reworked strike a/c to night naval (no way I’m going to be able to penetrate that IJN CAP and cover friendly bases/ships in daylight) to be able to hit that hex. I gotta figure that’s at least part of the KB moving there – it’s a good central position in the gulf to interdict the fleeing Allied ships. Lastly, I’ve sent two squadrons of PTs (6ea) to that hex. Fingers crossed they all can do something productive. Will still likely be a bloody turn!

In WAUS, IJA LBA (Sallys/Oscar IIb) continues to hit the Aussie ground forces with good effect. LRCAP continues to provide ineffective cover. Can’t do much else right now with the threat off Gove. Plan remains to bring HBs and P-38Gs to Meekathera when the dust settles at Gove.

In China, L_S_T brings out all the stops and launches heavy airstrikes to close Chungking AF – and my fighters remain resting at Kweiyang. Numerous Sonia and Lillys, fairly well escorted by Tojos do succeed in closing the airfield. Will attempt a LRCAP intercept next turn as a number of the raids did come in unescorted - hopefully we can get some luck.

In India/Burma, pretty quiet, but the usual nighttime Welly raid on Magwe does REALLY well: 14 Oscar IIB, 9 Tojo, 6 Tony and 2 Nicks destroyed on the ground in exchange for 4 Wellingtons lost – a heavy price, looks like better AA has arrived. Still, a worthwhile raid. Will try a pair of B-25 squadrons next turn, since the Wellys need to rest.

Below screenshot depicts the events in and around Gove from 26-29 Jan 43:
Image

28-29 Jan 1943

Highlights – Gove taken but the cost isn’t light at sea; Marines land on Lunga

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Yamagumo)
SS: 1 (I-30)
xAK: 1

Jpn ships un-sunk:
DD: 1 (Hagikaze)

Allied ships sunk:
DD: 3 (Mahan, Shaw, Stuart)
PT: 3
SC: 1
AM: 2
AP: 1
AK: 1
xAP: 3
xAK: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 31
Allied: 53

Subwar:
Jpn: 2 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAP sunk)
Allies: 6 Attacks, 3 ship hit (DD Yamagumo sunk, SS RO-60 dam, xAKL dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv:
Lunga (SOPAC)

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated:
Gove (SWPAC)

SIGINT/Intel: KB departs Arafura Sea to points unknown.

West Coast/Admin: NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, Lunga invasion goes like clockwork! At least 4 subs are reported hit by patrolling ASW a/c, and another 2—3 are roughly handled by ships d/c attacks – and one reported as sunk. Subs were the only threat – no mines or a/c. CA TF (3CA, 2CL, 5DD, DMS) bombards with good effect (425 casualties) and then heads to Ndeni to replenish – CA Chester getting missed by a sub in the process. Land based bombers from Ndeni and Luganville also soften up defenders. Amph TF (2CA, 3DD, DE, 2AM, AVP, 13AP, 2APD, 5AK, 4xAP) carrying the 1st USMC Div(+) lands the troops without incident. By the end of two days, all but one Marine Regiment (reinforcing from 2nd Mar Div) is offloaded completely, and about 1/3 of the APs are fully offloaded and will head back to Luganville to load more troops. Remaining ships will remain to offload supplies for another turn at least. CV TFs will move to a position near Kirakira, hoping to avoid subs reportedly converging on their current position near Rennell Is. Naval air will continue to provide ASW support, some TBFs will conduct some ground support, and the majority of the SBDs will continue to be held back for a potential naval strike – although this isn’t likely right now. Kira based LRCAP will have the priority of providing the CAP over the landings. IJA defenses look to consist of 1/3 of the Imperial Guards Div, SNLF and Naval Guard unit plus support. Marines will conduct a deliberate attack next turn, to at least reduced defenses. So far so good here.

In SWPAC, it could have been worse. Much worse. As it is, it isn’t good, but it won’t stop operations. Surprisingly, the IJN Navy sticks to the limited objective of bombarding Groote Eylandt – and sinking any Allied ships that didn’t get out the way fast enough. One substantial naval engagement, Allied CL TF (2CL, 4DD) engaged the fastest IJN TF (3CL, 4DD) was inconclusive, not a single 6” shell found a target – despite Arleigh Burke commanding. Numerous other small engagements between the IJN Fleet in two other TFs (4CA, 5DD and 2BB, CL, 5DD) and the scattering Gove Amphib TF. DDs valiantly attempted to protect their charges, and some did – others didn’t and some gave up themselves to do so. All in all, some 14 separate engagements at night in the Gove hex or the adjacent one to the east resulted in the loss of 3DD, AM, AP, 2xAP and an AK). Damage to the IJN was less than negligible. Another xAP was lost to a sub at Gove, and an SC and xAK lost to the IJN when they closed on Groote to bombard – which they did with good effect, closing the AF and reducing the 4k of supply stocked to zero. PTs were singularly ineffective, losing 3 boats for no hits. Only the SS Pollack managed to score, reporting the DD Yamagumo sunk with a single torp hit. Fortunately, (and surprisingly) the KB itself didn’t head east, and conducted no naval strikes at all. Merauke AF was subjected to a heavy fighter sweep – 117 Zeros which the limited CAP (13 P-38G, 11 Kittyhawk, and 6 Beaufighters) shot down 18. US strike a/c did send 33 night time naval strike sorties (low naval and torp) against the KB over the two days, none of which scored a single hit. Lastly, Gove fell on the first assault, with the 400 odd defenders being wiped out. Overall, as I’ve said a number of times in this AAR, it could have been worse. Gove landings were more expensive than I intended, but the base was taken, and nothing irreplaceable was lost – although the xAP/APs lost did have a number of support squads on board when they went down – that will invariably slow expansion of Gove. Will begin re-routing the dispersed shipping, and attempt to resume resupply operations to Groote as priority, and bring more troops (eng and support) to Gove. Intent is to establish Gove as a major base as its well within range to shut Darwin down (8 hexes).

In WAUS, IJA LBA was limited to Oscar sweeps over Allied troops in the desert, no Sallys flew. A few P-38Fs flew out of Meekatharra, and 6 Oscars were lost in exchange for 2 P-38s and a P-39. P-38s now at Exmouth, reducing the range to target. Now that Gove landing complete, will look to move the P-38Gs to Meekatharra, as well as bring back the B-24s now in SOPAC and work to shut Broome down. WAUS goal remains pushing towards Port Hedland to close the vice on the Japanese in NW Aus.

In China, US and Chinese LRCAP over Chungking doesn’t fair well against IJA Oscar sweeps, losing 6 P-40s and 3 Lancers for no IJA loss. Only one pilot lost though. Engineers repaired damage to get Chungking AF back in operation.

In India/Burma, NSTR.
Attachments
430126.jpg
430126.jpg (882.1 KiB) Viewed 45 times
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: 26-27 Jan 43

Post by FeurerKrieg »

Wow, quite lively turns!
Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: 26-27 Jan 43

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

Well if he threw everything in the last few turns, then he shouldn't have the reserves to maintain the pressure.

fast transports missions from Normanton or Horn Island should be feasible; and by now you have so many construction battalions that sending them in near suicide runs should no longer by a problem

how is your air supply capability in Australia?
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

RE: 26-27 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Well if he threw everything in the last few turns, then he shouldn't have the reserves to maintain the pressure.

fast transports missions from Normanton or Horn Island should be feasible; and by now you have so many construction battalions that sending them in near suicide runs should no longer by a problem

how is your air supply capability in Australia?

KB remains a threat - I still can't contest its presence. It can overwhelm any one target if it chooses to throw its air at it. But it won't be without losses - to both sides, and I'm not sure if L_S_T wants that.

So I figure he's not going to loiter all too long in restricted confines north of Australia. But as long as the KB does, its presence alone will shut down ops. That's OK, troops are ashore, Gove seized and good supply there. And best of all, since he's got pretty much the entire navy here, he's got little else to oppose the Lunga op.

I've got to focus on bringing Groote supplies back up, then I can use landing craft from their to Gove if necessary.

C-47s have been flying already - have about half dozen full squadrons, plus a few more if needed. And some PBYs if things get real dicey. Coronados too.

This will slow progress, which truthfully isn't a bad thing. I don't really have the resources to push hard anywhere right now - especially airframes.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: 26-27 Jan 43

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

If I have to bet, as soon as Gove becomes "big" he will start withdrawing from northern Oz.
Have you tried to advance from the south? I know it is hard supply wise,

good luck on your Solomon's operation
User avatar
IdahoNYer
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:07 am
Location: NYer living in Boise, ID

30-31 Jan 43

Post by IdahoNYer »

30-31 Jan 43

Highlights – Lunga falls; IJN fleet remains in Arafura Sea, NW of Gove

Jpn ships sunk:

Allied ships sunk:
APD: 1 (Crane)
PT: 4

Air loss:
Jpn: 49
Allied: 25

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 1 Attacks, 0 ships hit

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated:
Lunga (SOPAC)

SIGINT/Intel: KB sighted in the Arafura Sea, NW of Darwin.

West Coast/Admin: With the start of Feb 43 coming up, Fletcher class DDs head to ports for refit. Trying to front load as many as possible, but of course, they need to be pulled from duty.

In NOPAC, I’m forced to withdraw NOPAC’s only PBY squadron – will be replaced by one currently doing anti-sub patrols off the West Coast. Forgot about this one, so there will be a couple of turns without good search coverage. Can never have too many PBYs, and losing a squadron or two to withdrawals still hurts!

In CENPAC, BB California (21/60/18) departs PH under heavy escort (CVE, 4DD, DE, KV, SC), bound for further repairs on the West Coast. Fingers crossed here…

In SOPAC, Lunga falls in the second assault – surprised. Figured I’d be reducing forts for a while. Good news, but my troops are prepped for Lunga, not Tassafaronga. Those headaches, I can live with. 1st USMC Div and incoming elements from the 37th and Americal Div will continue the fight to Tassafaronga while the 2nd USMC Div will shift focus to Tulagi – estimated held by a Bde sized force. With no major IJN threat, the US CVs will depart SOPAC for operations in CENPAC, as will ¾ of the avail AP/AK in SOPAC. CA TF will remain for a while longer to provide gunfire support, but operations will be limited in SOPAC for a bit as Lunga is built up. Significant number of B-17 and B-24 squadrons will also depart to WAUS.

In SWPAC, the KB remains in theater, hitting Groote ground forces with a large airstrike – ground forces? Don’t understand that one, and the US 503rd Para Reg is hit by a massive strike (104Z, 143K, 87V, 53J) which only caused 48 casualties and lost 6V, 2K and 6J to AA. Perhaps they were set to ground attack Gove, but weathered out and hit Groote instead? Only thing that makes sense to me. In any case, Groote is also the target of a BB TF (2BB,3CA, CL, 6DD) bombardment which sinks 3PTs but does minimal damage to Groote – the AF is open. Supplies remain low at both Gov and Groote, and my lone APD heading to Gove is pummeled by KB air and sunk. Most of my shipping is still being held back by friendly ports, only a small convoy of a few xAK/xAKLs will attempt to dock and offload at Groote. LBA will try to hit the KB at night if it stays in the Arafura Sea, and half a dozen subs will converge, but I don’t hold high hopes for success.

In WAUS, IJA air continues to focus on the lead Allied force west of Port Hedland, still not covered well enough by LRCAP. But the LRCAP has more teeth with the P-38Fs – 12 OscarIIb are lost inexchange for 2 Kittyhawks, 2 P-38F, and 2 P-40E. Still too many Oscars to break into the bombers, and the Sallys drop their loads with good effect. But help is on the way to shut down Broome. P-38Gs and B-17s/24s begin the transit to WAUS from both SWPAC and SOPAC. Once in place, will hit Broome AF hard.

In China, IJA air hits Kweiyang AF for the first time, destroying 3 Chinese Lancers on the ground, but sparing the US P-40Es. Will move the US fighters back to Chungking and hope to catch an incoming raid – but I think the time of good CAP Traps over Chungking is closing for the P-40E. On the ground L_S_T continues to focus on reducing the Chinese forces around Lanchow, which are slowly being reduced. So far, not much ground activity near Chungking recently.

In India/Burma, a third RTA Division is brought into Warazup, so L_S_T is still focused on taking the base. Will start bringing in another Indian Para unit to continue the defense, and will bring some of the now rested Air Forces to provide support. In Aden, the 9th Aus Div begins loading transports to transit to India where it will be employed to seize Akyab. Want to try and seize Akyab for two reasons – 1st, I want to keep L_S_T focused on the frontier fight, expanding troops and planes to defend; 2nd, Akyab AFs bring Magwe in range of short legged a/c. Am also looking to a limited thrust on Shwebo in the center of the front, to at least disrupt the supply flow to IJA forces in the Myitkyina area. Goal remains keep the pressure on in this Theater and attrit the enemy in the air and on the ground. My problem remains, resources remain limited, especially airframes, but they ARE getting better!
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”