naval bombardment - result
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
naval bombardment - result
hello, we are playing guadalcanal scenario (witp:AE) and I (jap) have bombarded this base (lunga), but my friend (allied) is not happy with the result and told me that is excessive. What is your opinion? thanks in advance.
Night Naval bombardment of Lunga at 114,138 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Allied aircraft
no flights
Allied aircraft losses
F4F-4 Wildcat: 129 damaged
F4F-4 Wildcat: 33 destroyed on ground
PBY-5 Catalina: 63 damaged
PBY-5 Catalina: 11 destroyed on ground
Hudson III (LR): 42 damaged
Hudson III (LR): 6 destroyed on ground
SBD-3 Dauntless: 49 damaged
SBD-3 Dauntless: 12 destroyed on ground
33 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
BB Hiei, Shell hits 1
CA Suzuya
CA Haguro
CA Myoko
CA Maya
CA Atago, Shell hits 1
CA Takao
CA Chikuma
CA Tone
DD Yugiri
DD Asagiri
DD Ariake
DD Yugure
DD Makigumo
Allied ground losses:
432 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 58 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (4 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Airbase hits 34
Airbase supply hits 18
Runway hits 123
BB Mutsu firing at 1st USMC/5th Regiment
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at BB Hiei
BB Hiei firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
CA Suzuya firing at Lunga
CA Haguro firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at CA Haguro
CA Myoko firing at Lunga
CA Maya firing at Lunga
CA Atago firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at CA Atago
CA Takao firing at Lunga
CA Chikuma firing at Lunga
CA Tone firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at CA Tone
DD Yugiri firing at Lunga
DD Asagiri firing at Lunga
DD Ariake firing at Lunga
DD Yugure firing at Lunga
DD Makigumo firing at Lunga
Night Naval bombardment of Lunga at 114,138 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Allied aircraft
no flights
Allied aircraft losses
F4F-4 Wildcat: 129 damaged
F4F-4 Wildcat: 33 destroyed on ground
PBY-5 Catalina: 63 damaged
PBY-5 Catalina: 11 destroyed on ground
Hudson III (LR): 42 damaged
Hudson III (LR): 6 destroyed on ground
SBD-3 Dauntless: 49 damaged
SBD-3 Dauntless: 12 destroyed on ground
33 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
BB Hiei, Shell hits 1
CA Suzuya
CA Haguro
CA Myoko
CA Maya
CA Atago, Shell hits 1
CA Takao
CA Chikuma
CA Tone
DD Yugiri
DD Asagiri
DD Ariake
DD Yugure
DD Makigumo
Allied ground losses:
432 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 58 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (4 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Airbase hits 34
Airbase supply hits 18
Runway hits 123
BB Mutsu firing at 1st USMC/5th Regiment
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at BB Hiei
BB Hiei firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
CA Suzuya firing at Lunga
CA Haguro firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at CA Haguro
CA Myoko firing at Lunga
CA Maya firing at Lunga
CA Atago firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at CA Atago
CA Takao firing at Lunga
CA Chikuma firing at Lunga
CA Tone firing at 9th USMC Defense Battalion
9th USMC Defense Battalion firing at CA Tone
DD Yugiri firing at Lunga
DD Asagiri firing at Lunga
DD Ariake firing at Lunga
DD Yugure firing at Lunga
DD Makigumo firing at Lunga
RE: naval bombardment - result
60 aircraft destroyed... Overstack airfield at Lunga?
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: Yaab
60 aircraft destroyed... Overstack airfield at Lunga?
I don't know...perhaps... I am the japanese player [:)]
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: Yaab
60 aircraft destroyed... Overstack airfield at Lunga?
And almost 300 damaged...! Did the allies have anywhere near that many a/c in that area at the time...? If they had
I'd say a naval bombardment effort of that magnitude could result in that much damage. OTH, if you rerun it couldn't
the results be miniscule...? Is that not how the game works?
Fred
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book on Operation Sea Lion - www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - a book series on how The Philippines were saved - in 1942! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
Saving MacArthur - a book series on how The Philippines were saved - in 1942! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
RE: naval bombardment - result
Damages just mean number of hits i.e one aircraft can be hit multiple times.
RE: naval bombardment - result
You opponent needs to read up on what happened on the night of October 13-14, 1942. With two Kongos, one CL, and 9DDs, they destroyed more than half the aircraft at Henderson Field (48 total and damaged many of the rest), as well as torched most of the fuel supply, and killed six pilots. It looks like your opponent had more aircraft at Guadalcanal than the Allies did in the real war at that time, and you used a much larger force than the Japanese did.
Bill
Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
RE: naval bombardment - result
Right, 8 CAs. Ouch!
- KenchiSulla
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
RE: naval bombardment - result
The result does not seem that odd to me.. Your bombardment group was not contested (?) and fired a lot of shells into a fairly small area containing a lot of aircraft....
I can understand his unhappiness with the situation but the solution lies with defending his base better (or, for example, flying your aircraft to a secondary base behind the lines before the bombardment), not claiming a problem with the game engine...
I can understand his unhappiness with the situation but the solution lies with defending his base better (or, for example, flying your aircraft to a secondary base behind the lines before the bombardment), not claiming a problem with the game engine...
AKA Cannonfodder
"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
RE: naval bombardment - result
thank to all very much. Last question: the problem was the overstock of airplanes? or not enough coastal batteries defense?
RE: naval bombardment - result
Did you set the bombardment range for the ships? Maybe the range was 0 and the ships bombarded with all their guns, including AA guns.
- KenchiSulla
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
RE: naval bombardment - result
When battleships are involved, coastal defenses (unless of large caliber) will have no or almost no effect.. If you have to keep your aircraft at the base, the best solution is to have surface ships of your own to counter the bombardment... PT boats are a personal favorite against battleships, especially in low light conditions....
AKA Cannonfodder
"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: Yaab
Did you set the bombardment range for the ships? Maybe the range was 0 and the ships bombarded with all their guns, including AA guns.
my range was 6 hexes and I put "escort bombard: yes"
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: KenchiSulla
When battleships are involved, coastal defenses (unless of large caliber) will have no or almost no effect.. If you have to keep your aircraft at the base, the best solution is to have surface ships of your own to counter the bombardment... PT boats are a personal favorite against battleships, especially in low light conditions....
thanks!
RE: naval bombardment - result
Yeah, you know when the men that endured it refer to it as "the bombardment" considering numerous times they were shelled, it had to be terrifying.ORIGINAL: wdolson
You opponent needs to read up on what happened on the night of October 13-14, 1942. With two Kongos, one CL, and 9DDs, they destroyed more than half the aircraft at Henderson Field (48 total and damaged many of the rest), as well as torched most of the fuel supply, and killed six pilots. It looks like your opponent had more aircraft at Guadalcanal than the Allies did in the real war at that time, and you used a much larger force than the Japanese did.
Bill
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
RE: naval bombardment - result
Looks like overstacking. The number of planes reported destroyed is always underreported in my experience, and 62 are shown destroyed here. So you got maybe around 80? With lots more damaged. Looks like he had perhaps 200+ planes there, and some of them with multiple engines? You should both read up on the mechanics of overstacking, however there has been a slight update since the information in the manual, which is that it is number of engines not the number of planes that matters for the "Aircraft Stack Level" line on the airfield information screen. Those Hudsons, for example, count twice as much towards the stacking limit as the Wildcats do.
The Catalinas, being amphibious, should not count towards the aircraft stacking level even if they are being supported by shore-based aviation support instead of a seaplane tender.
Small quibble, but it is a "Fog of War"-ed number that is related to the number of hits on an aircraft that don't result in a destroyed plane (e.g., 1 hit that results in a destroyed plane will show "1 destroyed" and nothing for damaged).
The Catalinas, being amphibious, should not count towards the aircraft stacking level even if they are being supported by shore-based aviation support instead of a seaplane tender.
ORIGINAL: Yaab
Damages just mean number of hits i.e one aircraft can be hit multiple times.
Small quibble, but it is a "Fog of War"-ed number that is related to the number of hits on an aircraft that don't result in a destroyed plane (e.g., 1 hit that results in a destroyed plane will show "1 destroyed" and nothing for damaged).
- RogerJNeilson
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:21 am
- Location: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK
RE: naval bombardment - result
Simple answer, don't park planes in a concentration on an airfield where the enemy can bombard, if you do it won't be pleasant.
Roger
Roger
An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released
RE: naval bombardment - result
It is the way it works. Been that way ever since the game came out. PT boats, mines and surface forces are the counter. It is either that or evac the base when you smell a bombardment.
It is to easy to do but it works both ways and will not change at this stage.
It is to easy to do but it works both ways and will not change at this stage.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.
Sigismund of Luxemburg
Sigismund of Luxemburg
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: Maulet
ORIGINAL: Yaab
Did you set the bombardment range for the ships? Maybe the range was 0 and the ships bombarded with all their guns, including AA guns.
my range was 6 hexes and I put "escort bombard: yes"
The range you are referring to is probably the reaction range. Look just above it in a bombardment TF to see the bombardment range. I think the default is '0', and if that's what was set you hit him with everything, including the kitchen sink.[:D]
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume
In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche
Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche
Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: wdolson
You opponent needs to read up on what happened on the night of October 13-14, 1942. With two Kongos, one CL, and 9DDs, they destroyed more than half the aircraft at Henderson Field (48 total and damaged many of the rest), as well as torched most of the fuel supply, and killed six pilots. It looks like your opponent had more aircraft at Guadalcanal than the Allies did in the real war at that time, and you used a much larger force than the Japanese did.
Bill
ORIGINAL: SuluSea
Yeah, you know when the men that endured it refer to it as "the bombardment" considering numerous times they were shelled, it had to be terrifying.
I believe it was the first time BBs had ever been used for shore bombardment and the Japanese essentially gave the US ideas. The effect was so traumatic the USN risked their dwindling surface ships including two fast battleships to stop them. In two surface actions on two different nights the USN managed to sink both Japanese BBs, but the cost was high.
I think the Japanese also got lucky on their first bombardment and happened to hit the airfield with most of their rounds. Few bombardment missions during the war were quite as successful.
Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
RE: naval bombardment - result
ORIGINAL: rustysi
ORIGINAL: Maulet
ORIGINAL: Yaab
Did you set the bombardment range for the ships? Maybe the range was 0 and the ships bombarded with all their guns, including AA guns.
my range was 6 hexes and I put "escort bombard: yes"
The range you are referring to is probably the reaction range. Look just above it in a bombardment TF to see the bombardment range. I think the default is '0', and if that's what was set you hit him with everything, including the kitchen sink.[:D]
Ah, the glorious night of IJN 25mm AA guns! So they can hit Allied aircraft after all!