Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by Mgellis »

This is a revised version of Connie and Qatif, 1980. I believe I have fixed the polygon error. I have also made a few minor tweaks and improvements. Please take a look and let me know if it is working properly, if anything else could be improved, etc. Thanks!

Version 2 uploaded 11:30 PM EST 5/11/16

Attachments
Connie and..if, 1980.zip
(170.4 KiB) Downloaded 32 times
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by Mgellis »

Is the revised version ready to be sent to the Community Scenario Pack? Thanks.
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by Mgellis »

Anyone try this one yet? Not trying to be a pest...I just don't want to post it and then find out there is something wrong with it. Thanks.
skjold89
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:00 pm

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by skjold89 »

I'll try to get around to try some of your revised missions as i never played these to begin with, i'll get back to you Mgellis.

Edit:
I personally don't like absolute failure states in a large scale engagement like this, i got a harpoon attack one of my destroyers and the mission was over the first playthrough, working on a second playthrough.
Edit2: Might have been me ignoring orders and attacking Iran (i like to see if i can break orders in missions) actually.
skjold89
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:00 pm

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by skjold89 »

Conclusion:
Very hard mission
Very good míssion
Don't like instant failure if losing a ship in such a large scale fight, just let it reflect on the score instead.
There is 3 iranian radars quite literally in the middle of the ocean next to Towers and Fife.

Also, amazingly the Queenfish missed all 15 torpedoes against a damaged ship.

SIDE: United States
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
4x F-14A Tomcat
1x A-6E Intruder
1x SSN 637 Sturgeon


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
28x AIM-54A Phoenix
61x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
6x AIM-7F Sparrow III
24x Mk82 500lb LDGP
34x RIM-66A SM-1MR Blk IV
4x AGM-45B Shrike [ARM]
24x RIM-7H Sea Sparrow
24x 127mm/54 HE-CVT [HiFrag]
24x AGM-62B Walleye II ER/DL
4x Mk186 TORCH Flare [Seduction]
15x Mk48 Mod 3
3x AIM-9H Sidewinder



SIDE: Iran
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
4x F-14A Tomcat
3x P 221 Kaman [La Combattante II]
2x Radar (AN/TPS-70)
2x SH-3D Sea King [ASH-3D]
2x P-3F Orion
6x F-4D Phantom II


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
39x AIM-54A Phoenix
21x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
27x SA-5c Gammon [5V28M5]
30x 76mm/62 Compact HE Burst [4 rnds]
119x 40mm/70 Single Bofors Burst [4 rnds]
4x RGM-84A Harpoon IP
1x AGM-65A Maverick EO



SIDE: Saudi Rebels
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
12x F-5E Tiger II
4x 20mm/85 Vulcan M167 [500 rnds]
1x Radar (Generic Air Traffic Control)
1x Radar (AN/MPQ-49 FAAR)
1x MSC 412 Addriyah [Safwa, Bluebird Class]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
20x 20mm/85 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by Mgellis »

Ack! Apparently some of the changes I made did not save. Version 2 with the changes saved (I hope) has been uploaded. Please give it a try and let me know what you think. Thanks.
AlexGGGG
Posts: 685
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:23 pm

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by AlexGGGG »

I don't quite like the grouping which includes a SAM site, SA-5C of Bandar-e-Abbas. Because when I play in Group View, it does not show me the SAM range circle. I have to switch to unit view to see enemy SAM ranges.
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Connie and Qatif, 1980 -- REVISED scenario, please review

Post by Mgellis »

ORIGINAL: AlexGGGG

I don't quite like the grouping which includes a SAM site, SA-5C of Bandar-e-Abbas. Because when I play in Group View, it does not show me the SAM range circle. I have to switch to unit view to see enemy SAM ranges.

That, unfortunately, I can't do anything about. I just used the import files for Iranian EW and AD. Sorry!

(Interestingly, the SAM range circles do show up, if you zoom out enough. But they disappear when you zoom in. I'm not sure why that is true, unless it is a function of the grouping of multiple SAM sites in the import file.)



Post Reply

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”