ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Its not about the actually loss but Japanese subs ability to completely disregard any and all ASW effort.
I had 12 CATs + 24 Hudsons doing NavS over the TF. All TBs/DBs where doing 50 NavS/20ASW. Long Island had 15 TBs doing ASW. I had 4 ASW TFs in the same hex. 2 leading and 2 trailing. The TF had 64 ASW value in itself. And they could just as well have not been there. Absolutely silly. Just as when I lost Ent. Its a joke and a bad one. Whats the point of even trying if the only thing you can do is leave your CVs in port? Every time I move my CVs I get a lump in my throat because I know that regardless of what I do my CVs are completely defenseless against Japanese subs. It doesnt matter if I have good leaders, good training and make every effort to avoid his subs the just magically pop up in the middle of the CV. All Jeff has to do is to get a sub in the same hex as an Allied CV and its a done deal.
If my subs where doing half as good half of KB would have been gone by now. Sick of it.
Does the CR show the complete TF OOB? If so I don't see how you get 64 ASW value out of four DDs. Of course, ASW value doesn't add like that either. Each ship gets considered as itself. There's no additive heft to having lots of ASW-capable ships in the TF other than you get more passes through to detect and engage the sub.
Four DDs is too few in this era for a CV TF.
Were the DDs upgraded?
Air Search is poor at finding subs, especially early on. Air ASW, and 1000 feet.
All that said, sometimes the other guy gets lucky. But you could reduce his luck with seven DDs instead of four.
I lost Enterprise to a sub on December 15, 1941. That week at least. It hurts. You play on. As others have said, open the ship queue and look at 1944. I'm IN 1944 and I just did that this week. It helps.
I'm gonna ask that you just...not do that. I need you grasping for straws [:'(].
ORIGINAL: JocMeister
It was 12 DDs in the TF. All newly upgraded. Some had 8 ASW value.
What was the weather? In poor weather, the chance of the sub being spotted before it attacks is probably lower. There's also just luck involved, really.
ORIGINAL: ny59giants
I have 8 DDs with each CV TF almost always. Maybe it goes down to 6, but not for long. Then, some DDs go with my 18 knot AOs that I use with my CVs. Third, my SC TF get some DDs. Once I get enough DDs, then I have each CV TF ordered to follow a single ASW TF. I know its extra micro-management, but I even use arcs for my ASW FPs within the CV TF to increase odds. Like you, I tend to fear enemy subs in '42 more than KB. [;)]
In my game that recently concluded, at times I was running only 5-6 DDs in a late war CVTF... but situations differed. My opponent either had few subs left or didn't feel like using/losing them very often, and he had amazing air search. I didn't want my CV TFs to be bigger than 15 ships or so, to prevent instant DL 10/10 the turn I came within search range. Lots of experimentation was involved in those decisions.