A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19745
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Some American infantry units get a full battalion of Pershing tanks in 1945. You don't see their AV go up but you can imagine the effect of the heavy tanks.

And their lift requirement.[:D]
Does the game model the bridges that they cannot cross? [&:]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: rustysi

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Some American infantry units get a full battalion of Pershing tanks in 1945. You don't see their AV go up but you can imagine the effect of the heavy tanks.

And their lift requirement.[:D]
Does the game model the bridges that they cannot cross? [&:]

No.

Alfred
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19745
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: rustysi




And their lift requirement.[:D]
Does the game model the bridges that they cannot cross? [&:]

No.

Alfred
I knew that Alfred - I was just kibitzing. Couldn't find a smiley I thought was appropriate. [:)]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
undercovergeek
Posts: 1533
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: UK

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by undercovergeek »

another if i may gentlemen, i shall shortly be taking ceylon as a prize for the emperor - theres quite a large invasion force - is it best to have the carriers in 1 TF LRCAPing the invasion fleet in another TF, or just one huge TF with the carriers within?
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by zuluhour »

time frame for one, early war, No, penalties apply. Need specifics, Oh your Japan, .....CAP from Diego.....[:@]
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

another if i may gentlemen, i shall shortly be taking ceylon as a prize for the emperor - theres quite a large invasion force - is it best to have the carriers in 1 TF LRCAPing the invasion fleet in another TF, or just one huge TF with the carriers within?

No CVs in an invasion TF!!! Ever!!! [:-]

Firstly they only operate at 50% effectiveness in a base hex. Bad news. Secondly, NO!! Your CV running at 32 knots launching planes 10k yards off the invasion beaches dodging landing craft? [:(]

You can get by with CVEs in there if you're really strapped for escorts, but I would not recommend it. Those TFs get close to the beach, CV/CVE should be laying off out of CD gun range, not supporting troops with 5inch cover fire. You can put CVEs in the invasion hex in their own CV escort TF. They operate fully even in a base hex.

It's always better to organize TFs as they were in the war, with only a few exceptions dependent on extreme conditions. An amphib TF should have some big guns if possible, a good number of escorts for support and ASW, and shouldn't get too large and unwieldy or it risks collisions, especially in a surface engagement. Although large TFs are inevitable late for the Allies, it's not always ideal.

For an invasion if it's safe to place the CVs one hex off the beaches (if this doesn't risk surface ships running in to engage them) and then you're fine with bleeding CAP instead of LR CAP. Just set CAP to 30-50% as you normally do, at the range you need to escort your strike planes (for the Japanese usually 8, for the Allies usually 7 hexes).

Remember, the CVs still have to defend themselves as well. If the enemy CVs show up unexpectedly you want the settings to be as friendly for a CV engagement as possible.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

another if i may gentlemen, i shall shortly be taking ceylon as a prize for the emperor - theres quite a large invasion force - is it best to have the carriers in 1 TF LRCAPing the invasion fleet in another TF, or just one huge TF with the carriers within?

And how do you propose to accomplish this impossibility?

Look up what ship goes into which TF and that answers fully your wishful thinking. Japan doesn't have that many CVEs to provide any meaningful value.

Alfred
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

ORIGINAL: undercovergeek

another if i may gentlemen, i shall shortly be taking ceylon as a prize for the emperor - theres quite a large invasion force - is it best to have the carriers in 1 TF LRCAPing the invasion fleet in another TF, or just one huge TF with the carriers within?

And how do you propose to accomplish this impossibility?

Look up what ship goes into which TF and that answers fully your wishful thinking. Japan doesn't have that many CVEs to provide any meaningful value.

Alfred

As usual while I'm busy being verbose Alfred cuts to the chase with the most obvious and concise response! [:D]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
undercovergeek
Posts: 1533
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: UK

RE: A question or 2 for the geniuses (genii) here

Post by undercovergeek »

ive got to be honest and say i liked the verbose one most [:'(]
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”