What's an attack sub any good for?

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

jarraya
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:04 pm

RE: What's an attack sub any good for?

Post by jarraya »

During the Falklands war one UK sub sunk a cruiser and basically kept the entire Argentine navy in port. Not bad value for money from one sub.
User avatar
DirtyFred
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 10:14 am

it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by DirtyFred »

oh dear maker, what a question!

Image

attack subs eat anything at sea, like cerberus. the best antiship platforms ever. they are so dangerous that now counter-torpedo systems are deployed. a dead giveaway that ASW is not so effective against recent subs.

attack aubs love High Value Assets like carriers, cruisers, amphib ships, ssbn's. the best subs will be around 2050 without a reactor but 3rd or 4th generation AIP (air independent propulsion) with endurence of 6-12 weeks. because noise is the only way to find a sub, also metal-hull subs with MAD (magnetic anomaly detection).

want so see russian, chinese and us navy surface officers sweat? bring in recent swedish, german, italian subs with AIP. you will listen and detect nothing. a hole in the water. it is so scary. so deadly.

all you hear is a torpedo launch or acceleration noise. maybe 20 seconds to impact or less. only counter-torpedos, masker and nixies (decoys) will work but you dont have the time to deploy them.

even the chinese have mastered the attack sub forte: in october 2006 a Chinese Song-class diesel-electric attack submarine quietly surfaced within nine miles of Kitty Hawk in the waters between Japan and Taiwan. peek-a-boo!

be afraid, very afraid :)

google "us carrier periscope photo"
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
ExNusquam
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:26 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by ExNusquam »

because noise is the only way to find a sub, also metal-hull subs with MAD (magnetic anomaly detectiob).
Don't forget the other non-acoustic ASW methods involving wakes. It's assumed the Soviets (now Russians) are quite advanced in this regard, to the point where some have theorized that the Russians could have a picture of most US SSBN bastions.

Ref1:The Naval Institute Guide to the Soviet Navy, P.28
Ref2: Center for Naval Analyses paper
Ref3: Even the US is (probably) getting in on it
Hurricane144
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:24 pm

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by Hurricane144 »

ORIGINAL: ExNusquam
the Russians could have a picture of most US SSBN bastions.

What do you mean?
ExNusquam
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:26 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by ExNusquam »

What do you mean?
Using a space-based IR system to look for water disturbances, you could theoretically track SSBN deployments and determine their operating areas/tracks. A second-strike capability isn't worth much if REDFOR can track it.
Hurricane144
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:24 pm

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by Hurricane144 »

Do they disturb the water in a way detectable by IR while at depth? If so, how?
User avatar
MR_BURNS2
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:19 am
Location: Austria

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by MR_BURNS2 »


google "us carrier periscope photo"

Thanks for the tip, that was...eye-opening...[X(]

As the old saying goes...there are only two classes of ships, submarines and targets.
Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;


ExNusquam
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:26 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by ExNusquam »

Do they disturb the water in a way detectable by IR while at depth? If so, how?
As it's been explained to me, submarines leave a fairly pronounced underwater wake. This wake can be pronounced enough that it could affect the thermal characteristics of the surface water.

However, it should be fairly obvious why this tech isn't a deciding factor yet; you've got to filter out every surface ship wake as well.
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by SeaQueen »

People have been talking about doing that sort of thing since the 80s. It's actually discussed in a book called Strategic Antisubmarine Warfare and Naval Strategy by Tom Stefanick. On p. 202 they talk about reactor generated IR plumes. The problem is that temperature variations of a similar magnitude can be caused by multiple phenomena, making it difficult to distinguish between a submarine plume and other natural phenomena.

ORIGINAL: ExNusquam
Do they disturb the water in a way detectable by IR while at depth? If so, how?
As it's been explained to me, submarines leave a fairly pronounced underwater wake. This wake can be pronounced enough that it could affect the thermal characteristics of the surface water.

However, it should be fairly obvious why this tech isn't a deciding factor yet; you've got to filter out every surface ship wake as well.
Hurricane144
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:24 pm

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by Hurricane144 »

Wow excellent book! Hard to find that one.
AlmightyTallest
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:00 pm

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by AlmightyTallest »

There's a few different ways of detecting submarines from space as outlined here:

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/detection.pdf

Tracking a wake and making sure it's not a surface ship is easy with the correct algorithms in place. Below is a site on tracking ships from space with Synthetic Aperature Radar.

http://www.crisp.nus.edu.sg/~research/ship_detect/ship_det.htm

Tracking submarines from LEO with SAR satellites outlined here: http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/satellite-detection-of-submarines.html

UK paper on LIDAR for use in Submarine detection. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1252/1/2009birkelandmphil.pdf

Image


This is a LIDAR image of HMS A1. Image

I wouldn't hold too much emphasis on random photos through submarine periscopes from any country, because many of the exercises can be taken too easily out of context if you don't know the specific ROE or the reason for the training being conducted, the limited space or the way they set up the scenario or force structures.

Image



Additional info on ship detection, this service provides multiple satellite info. I would imagine the service is rather expensive, but you can see where pirates took your cargo vessel if such a thing should happen.

http://www.geo-airbusds.com/en/4445-ship-detection-tracking

User avatar
OnFire
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:51 am

RE: it is to scare seamen to death!

Post by OnFire »

Very useful info, thank you!
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”