Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Post by Chijohnaok2 »
ORIGINAL: deadmeat1471
ORIGINAL: Anthropoid
The liberal media must have aneurysms to watch that guy [:D]
Why?
Post by Chickenboy »
ORIGINAL: Leandros
Reading up
on the movie on wikipedia it seems as idiotic as Pitt's "Inglorious Bastards".
I was thinking more of how the main character's personality seemed to form. Maybe I am switching persons.ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Leandros
Reading up
on the movie on wikipedia it seems as idiotic as Pitt's "Inglorious Bastards".
No. Not really. Like Hans says, other than some stretched tactical plausibility issues with the last fight, everything leading up to that was quite reasonable. When taken in total, even the final battle's outcome was only slightly unrealistic.
ORIGINAL: Anthropoid
The liberal media must have aneurysms to watch that guy [:D]
ORIGINAL: deadmeat1471
Why?
ORIGINAL: chijohnaok
I won't go into too much detail as I don't want to derail this thread due to "political" reasons.
Let's just say that in the United States, many liberals (and much of the liberal media) are anti-gun.
The man/website pictured in the video (FPSRussia) is pro-gun.
Hence the potential reaction that Antropoid alluded to.
------------
Carry on.
They are now located at Aberdeen MD
Actually not much was left of the "crack" SS-troops in 1945. They fought with determination but most of them were raw recruits. BTW, they also had doubts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToKcmnrE5oY
Then they will go one to tell you what factory production run a particular vehicle came from and why your wheel bolt pattern is incorrect.
Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”
