(Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

For non-server PBEM games, post here to look for an opponent.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Post Reply
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

(Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Peltonx »

1941 GC Sudden Death or Alt VC260 1.08.2
Server game
Locked HQ Support
Full FOW

House Rules:
No Para drops at all.
No bombing of air bases more than 3 times a turn (after turn 1)
No bombing of HQ's unless stacked with a ground unit
No naval invasions before November 1941, none outside the 1939 Soviet borders before January 1943
In addition if Sevastopol is either isolated, or in German hands, none west of the Crimea,
which reflects the scope for air/naval interdiction not really reflected in the game.

Additional Auto VC:
If the Axis player holds
Leningrad, Moscow, Voronezh and Rostov concurrently at any time in 1941 he wins
an Auto Victory. No need to waste any ones time as we all know the end results based on past games if these cities fall in 1941.

Optional Rules Setup:

Normal Blizzard Rules
Random Weather
No 1-1 = 2-1

PM if your interested
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11699
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted

Post by loki100 »

so you really are looking for a completely one sided game?
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: loki100

so you really are looking for a completely one sided game?

Interesting statement dude.

For us low IQ people what do you mean, your clearly 2x my IQ as I don't understand your statement.

I have played the best of the best and have not backed down from playing anyone.

The options are what people consider standard now.

no 1v1=2v1
NO mild blizzard.

Still not sure about the non random, I am leaning for a random weather vs a good SHC player and non-random vs someone new as I just want to get it over with asap.

Some people want mild blizzard and +1 attack, but that's to over powered for SHC.

I believe no 1v1=2v1 and standard blizzard is the best balance.

non random or random I don't really care at this point.

I only play server based games because of reloads and hack and even then I have helped bag someone on a server based game after 1.08.

PBeM its just to easy, I have gotten several people wanting to do PBeM and no server. I just am not going to risk wasting 100's of hrs doing PBeM unless it is a personal friend.
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
hooooper_slith
Posts: 514
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:49 pm

RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted

Post by hooooper_slith »

Mr P - do you fancy a rematch? Non-random weather ...
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: hooooper

Mr P - do you fancy a rematch? Non-random weather ...

1941 GC Sudden Death or Alt VC260 1.08.3 or latest.
Server game
Locked HQ Support
Full FOW

House Rules:
No Para drops at all.
No bombing of air bases more than 3 times a turn (after turn 1)
No bombing of HQ's unless stacked with a ground unit
No naval invasions before November 1941, none outside the 1939 Soviet borders before January 1943
In addition if Sevastopol is either isolated, or in German hands, none west of the Crimea,
which reflects the scope for air/naval interdiction not really reflected in the game.

Additional Auto VC:
If the Axis player holds
Leningrad, Moscow, Voronezh and Rostov concurrently at any time in 1941 he wins
an Auto Victory. No need to waste any ones time as we all know the end results based on past games if these cities fall in 1941.

Optional Rules Setup:

Mild Blizzard Rules
Non Random Weather or Random
No 1-1 = 2-1

Basicly what every ones playing now, 1v1=2v1 is simply Middle Earth and why it was ever part of release no one knows.
Standard Blizzard is also non-historical and was made so because of all the HQBU exploits which were never nerfed until 1.07 and 1.08.

Mild Blizzard is historical.

Beta Tester WitW & WitE
Mehring
Posts: 2437
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:30 am

RE: GC sudden death or 260 VP 1941 Soviet Opponent wanted

Post by Mehring »

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Basicly what every ones playing now, 1v1=2v1 is simply Middle Earth

With the current lack of obligation or incentive to use this when it hurts the Russian I've reluctantly come to agree. Russian attack losses are far too low and they can run away all summer, then suddenly discover they have an attack doctrine. Nice idea, poor implementation and subject to gaming. Hope to see it finer tuned in WitE2
“Old age is the most unexpected of all things that can happen to a man.”
-Leon Trotsky
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

(Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: Mehring
ORIGINAL: Pelton

Basicly what every ones playing now, 1v1=2v1 is simply Middle Earth

With the current lack of obligation or incentive to use this when it hurts the Russian I've reluctantly come to agree. Russian attack losses are far too low and they can run away all summer, then suddenly discover they have an attack doctrine. Nice idea, poor implementation and subject to gaming. Hope to see it finer tuned in WitE2

It simply will not be part of the game, because there is no need.

With the combat hex added MP's, attacking will help even if your losing most of the time as Russians anyways in 41/42 summers.

And yes 1v1=2v1 was exploited to death and hoooper was the best at it. I would have done the same, if your offered an I win button you take it.
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Peltonx »

One of the 3 went afk so looking to start another one
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
Pitaman
Posts: 286
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:29 pm

RE: (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Pitaman »

Pelton,

I am willing to play you as the Russians. You can set the rules. I will just enjoy the experience of playing such an expert at this game. Let me know if you are interested.

Best regards,

Tom



User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: (Open) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: Pitaman

Pelton,

I am willing to play you as the Russians. You can set the rules. I will just enjoy the experience of playing such an expert at this game. Let me know if you are interested.

Best regards,

Tom




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFM9Mm ... r4&index=2
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

(Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: Pitaman

Pelton,

I am willing to play you as the Russians. You can set the rules. I will just enjoy the experience of playing such an expert at this game. Let me know if you are interested.

Best regards,

Tom




Ok






Beta Tester WitW & WitE
Pitaman
Posts: 286
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:29 pm

RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Pitaman »

Pelton,

Just finished my first turn. It would really be great if you did an AAR on our game. Would you be interested in doing that? Please advise.

Thanks,

Tom
Callistrid
Posts: 669
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:27 pm

RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Callistrid »

Pelton, the mild blizzard, and no 1v1=2v1 rule balancing the game, but the perfect, and unhistorical opening on south (Lvov, Kowel, etc. pockets) not.
charlie0311
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:15 am

RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by charlie0311 »

Yeah really, or Morveal could put in the "Loki's cat" random generator. that is, the P plan is all set but, maybe AGC logistics didn't get the word (loki's cat ate the message) all the stuff went to Minsk, the Pzs in the South get frozen for a turn or two.
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: Pitaman

Pelton,

Just finished my first turn. It would really be great if you did an AAR on our game. Would you be interested in doing that? Please advise.

Thanks,

Tom

I generally put turn 1 up once we are done turn 5 and so on.

So you can read it and post if you like.
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11699
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: (Closed) Soviet Opponent wanted - GC 260 VP 1941

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: charlie0311

Yeah really, or Morveal could put in the "Loki's cat" random generator. that is, the P plan is all set but, maybe AGC logistics didn't get the word (loki's cat ate the message) all the stuff went to Minsk, the Pzs in the South get frozen for a turn or two.

my cats are not that reliable [8D]
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents Wanted”