1938 GD game
Moderator: Vic
1938 GD game
Any one interested in another game of GD? I would like to play the US, seems I suck as the Axis.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
- ironduke1955
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: UK
RE: 1938 GD game
Count me in but if we can coincide this with the next version of GD1938, that may be a good idea, assuming that there will be a next version.
Are we like late Rome, infatuated with past glories, ruled by a complacent, greedy elite, and hopelessly powerless to respond to changing conditions?
- ernieschwitz
- Posts: 4246
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: 1938 GD game
Oh, I think there will be one
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
- Advanced Tactics Gold
DC: Warsaw to Paris
DC: Community Project.
- Jeffrey H.
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca.
RE: 1938 GD game
I'm open for another, after Ernie "fixes" the 100% production card muliplier....
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.
Ron Swanson
Ron Swanson
RE: 1938 GD game
Unless I am silly enough to go to work again, I would enjoy another game.
Chuck
Chuck
- ernieschwitz
- Posts: 4246
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: 1938 GD game
I have been working on a new version of GD 1938, its not balance tested, but if you are willing to do that for me, I see no problem in loading it up
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
- Advanced Tactics Gold
DC: Warsaw to Paris
DC: Community Project.
- ironduke1955
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: UK
RE: 1938 GD game
Thanks ernieschwitz I can't speak for everyone but I would be more than willing to balance test.
Are we like late Rome, infatuated with past glories, ruled by a complacent, greedy elite, and hopelessly powerless to respond to changing conditions?
RE: 1938 GD game
I look forward to the new version.
Chuck
Chuck
RE: 1938 GD game
I dont think a new version is enough for one of our potential players, he wants a "fix" to the cost of research increasing the production value of a nation.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
- ernieschwitz
- Posts: 4246
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: 1938 GD game
ORIGINAL: Twotribes
I dont think a new version is enough for one of our potential players, he wants a "fix" to the cost of research increasing the production value of a nation.
Well a "fix", might be something really simple. Like changing the time it takes to repay the investment. That can be done by changing one number, in fact, in the code. Or by adding a line and changing a number. So it is really simple. I wouldn´t count something like that as anything other than a minor change, on my part, although it could have a huge influence on the game.
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
- Advanced Tactics Gold
DC: Warsaw to Paris
DC: Community Project.
RE: 1938 GD game
My personal opinion is that except for China I have never had a problem advancing the goal if I wanted to, it does come at a cost though you can not raise as many troops or advance your tech as fast initially saving up for the boost.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
RE: 1938 GD game
It is not fun to defer the spending of PP in order to advance the production percentage, but I usually do it too.
It can take a while however.
Chuck
It can take a while however.
Chuck
- Jeffrey H.
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca.
RE: 1938 GD game
ORIGINAL: ernieschwitz
I have been working on a new version of GD 1938, its not balance tested, but if you are willing to do that for me, I see no problem in loading it up
Balance testing is ok with me.
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.
Ron Swanson
Ron Swanson
- Jeffrey H.
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca.
RE: 1938 GD game
ORIGINAL: ernieschwitz
ORIGINAL: Twotribes
I dont think a new version is enough for one of our potential players, he wants a "fix" to the cost of research increasing the production value of a nation.
Well a "fix", might be something really simple. Like changing the time it takes to repay the investment. That can be done by changing one number, in fact, in the code. Or by adding a line and changing a number. So it is really simple. I wouldn´t count something like that as anything other than a minor change, on my part, although it could have a huge influence on the game.
I thought perhaps we could exclude the non-discretionary production from the calculation of % increase. Prolly tough to do in a dynamic sense.
I've got a high HQ, (Stavka) completely overwhelmed with supplies that I cannot reduce while I'm starving for PP's. As I recall, India had a similar issue, in that no supply production
was necessary from the discretionary part of the production capacity, there was essentially infinite supply from the non discretionary production.
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.
Ron Swanson
Ron Swanson
- ernieschwitz
- Posts: 4246
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: 1938 GD game
Supplies made by oil sites and coal sites, and not to mention chemical factories are not included in the calculation.... So your wish i think, is already granted in that sense.
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
- Advanced Tactics Gold
DC: Warsaw to Paris
DC: Community Project.
- Jeffrey H.
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca.
RE: 1938 GD game
Here's a turn of production:
- Attachments
-
- Picture0001.jpg (20.17 KiB) Viewed 58 times
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.
Ron Swanson
Ron Swanson
- Jeffrey H.
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca.
RE: 1938 GD game
And here's the card:
- Attachments
-
- Picture0002.jpg (48.87 KiB) Viewed 58 times
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.
Ron Swanson
Ron Swanson
- Jeffrey H.
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: San Diego, Ca.
RE: 1938 GD game
So I get a +20% increase for 688 pp's. That much is clear to me. How do I go about trying to determine my base, non discretionary production capacity ?
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.
Ron Swanson
Ron Swanson
RE: 1938 GD game
That is a lot of production. The more production you have the higher the cost to increase production, that is why I usually increase production before ever building a factory.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
- ernieschwitz
- Posts: 4246
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: 1938 GD game
ORIGINAL: Jeffrey H.
Here's a turn of production:
Everything on that list, except Supply and Supply(Oil), counts as production. Each item on that list will have a cost, multiply that item cost with the number of items, and you get the production cost of those items. Add them all together and you get a total production cost.
And twotribes is right, factory production (Non-chemical factories) count too.
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
- Advanced Tactics Gold
DC: Warsaw to Paris
DC: Community Project.