Pelton(GHC) vs smokindave34 Turn 211 Game Complete DRAW

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by morvael »

Significant industry losses.
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: morvael

Significant industry losses.

Yes its ok. I stop counting hvy, basicly everything.
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

Turn 8 GHC Armaments: 76,000 VP:188


Armament Pts Destroyed = 40
Heavy Industry Destroyed = 37
Manpower Pts over run during 1942 =
Russian Units Destroyed after November 1st 1941
Corp:
Divisions:
Brigades:
SU:
AP total:
Total dead:1,328,000 Russian losses this turn: 90,000
Russian OOB: 4,284,000
A net gain of: 155,000
Russian units currently in a pocket:
GHC OOB: 3,366,000 ——- Ready Rifle Squads:
GHC net OOB change: -8,000

Air War

Ratio last turn: 6 : 1

GHC loses: 61
SHC loses: 350

Total GHC loses: 430
Total SHC loses: 6338

HQBU’s

This turn: 1
Total = 7

AGN keeps pushing. Looks like Leningrad will fall at this point.

Also the LW is starting to get the upper hand in the air war unlike my struggle with Saper.

4th PA has 3 Corp. 2 are set-up with 3 Infantry and 1 MoT division and 1 PZ Corp with 4 tank divisions.
4 top leaders, allot of SU and a bunch of 150mm+ guns.

Image
Attachments
North.jpg
North.jpg (330.58 KiB) Viewed 141 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

AGC has a good push going east of Gomel

Image
Attachments
center.jpg
center.jpg (361.04 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

AGS moves another Corp of panzers to the center, while SHC pulls back from D-Town.

Looks like SHC has given up in south and Leningrad is about done so I will start setting up for a drive on Moscow around turn 12.

Image
Attachments
south.jpg
south.jpg (349.6 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

Turn 9 GHC Armaments: 76,000 VP:188


Armament Pts Destroyed = 40
Heavy Industry Destroyed = 37
Manpower Pts over run during 1942 =
Russian Units Destroyed after November 1st 1941
Corp:
Divisions:
Brigades:
SU:
AP total:
Total dead:1,403,000 Russian losses this turn: 75,000
Russian OOB: 4,403,000
A net gain of: 117,000
Russian units currently in a pocket:
GHC OOB: 3,379,000 ——- Ready Rifle Squads:
GHC net OOB change: 13,000

Air War

Ratio last turn: 8 : 1

GHC loses: 49
SHC loses: 404

Total GHC loses: 479
Total SHC loses: 6742

HQBU’s

This turn: 1
Total = 8


Image
Attachments
n.jpg
n.jpg (557.89 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

AGC

Image
Attachments
c.jpg
c.jpg (583.73 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

AGS

Image
Attachments
s.jpg
s.jpg (545.24 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

Turn 10 GHC Armaments: 68,000 VP:200


Armament Pts Destroyed = 48
Heavy Industry Destroyed = 37
Manpower Pts over run during 1942 =
Russian Units Destroyed after November 1st 1941
Corp:
Divisions:
Brigades:
SU:
AP total:
Total dead:1,555,000 Russian losses this turn: 151,000
Russian OOB: 4,422,000
A net gain of: 19,000
Russian units currently in a pocket:
GHC OOB: 3,379,000 ——- Ready Rifle Squads:
GHC net OOB change: ,000
Lost Vehicles: 30,100

Air War

Ratio last turn: 10 : 1

GHC loses: 33
SHC loses: 320

Total GHC loses: 512
Total SHC loses: 7062

HQBU’s

This turn: 0
Total = 8


Image
Attachments
n.jpg
n.jpg (478.38 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

AGC

Image
Attachments
c.jpg
c.jpg (566.68 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34

Post by Peltonx »

AGS

Image
Attachments
s.jpg
s.jpg (544.32 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-11

Post by Peltonx »

Turn 11 GHC Armaments: 63,000 VP:201


Armament Pts Destroyed = 48
Heavy Industry Destroyed = 37
Manpower Pts over run during 1942 =
Russian Units Destroyed after November 1st 1941
Corp:
Divisions:
Brigades:
SU:
AP total:
Total dead:1,600,000 Russian losses this turn: 45,000
Russian OOB: 4,539,000
A net gain of: 117,000
Russian units currently in a pocket:
GHC OOB: 3,410,000 ——- Ready Rifle Squads:
GHC net OOB change: 31 ,000
Lost Vehicles to all causes: 214,000

Air War

Ratio last turn: 9 : 1

GHC loses: 30
SHC loses: 270

Total GHC loses: 542
Total SHC loses: 7336

HQBU’s

This turn: 0
Total = 8


Image
Attachments
n.jpg
n.jpg (579.65 KiB) Viewed 141 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-11

Post by Peltonx »

AGC

Image
Attachments
c.jpg
c.jpg (604.37 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-11

Post by Peltonx »

AGS

Image
Attachments
s.jpg
s.jpg (527.85 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-12

Post by Peltonx »

Turn 12 GHC Armaments: 75,000 VP:207


Armament Pts Destroyed = 56
Manpower Pts over run during 1942 =
Russian Units Destroyed after November 1st 1941
Corp:
Divisions:
Brigades:
SU:
AP total:
Total dead:1,633,000 Russian losses this turn: 33,000
Russian OOB: 4,137,000
A net gain of: 137,000
Russian units currently in a pocket:
GHC OOB: 3,414,000 ——- Ready Rifle Squads:
GHC net OOB change: 4 ,000
Lost Vehicles to all causes: 214,000

Air War

Ratio last turn: 3 : 1

GHC loses: 33
SHC loses: 109

Total GHC loses: 575
Total SHC loses: 7445

HQBU’s

This turn: 1
Total = 9

Leningrad is done so I am moving 4th PA and 16th south to start the drive for Moscow


Image
Attachments
n.jpg
n.jpg (423.78 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-12

Post by Peltonx »

AGC 2nd and 3rd PG start the left hook on Moscow, infantry divisions will support the flanks and push in the center.

4th PG will do the direct assault with 6 90+ morale infantry divisions and 6 panzer division.

1st PG will do a right hook.

My basic standard assault on Moscow.

Image
Attachments
c.jpg
c.jpg (430.32 KiB) Viewed 140 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-12

Post by Peltonx »

AGS will go after the 15 armament points in Rostov and try to free up AGB.

Infantry divisions simply keep marching east.

Image
Attachments
s.jpg
s.jpg (386.94 KiB) Viewed 141 times
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4518
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-12

Post by M60A3TTS »

Dave did a fair job of defending Leningrad to this point. I only question two things, first the choice of Yushkevich with an initiative of 4 at that critical spot on the Neva. Still, it looks like you had the numbers you needed regardless. Second would be the placing of the security regiments in the north. If they had disbanded, that could have been a problem.

If you can pick up another 15 arms at Rostov or anywhere else for that matter, he will be hurting for a while.

It will be interesting to see how HQBU helps you with the battle for Moscow.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-12

Post by morvael »

With the new rules I would certainly put a fort unit on the Neva hex as soon as possible to get level 3 fort. Certainly a better leader would be needed there as well. Of course against an attack of 6x90M infantry divisions that wouldn't really help, but at least this would force to mount a serious attack, no surprise attacks would be possible.
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Pelton vs smokindave34 T-12

Post by Peltonx »

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

Dave did a fair job of defending Leningrad to this point. I only question two things, first the choice of Yushkevich with an initiative of 4 at that critical spot on the Neva. Still, it looks like you had the numbers you needed regardless. Second would be the placing of the security regiments in the north. If they had disbanded, that could have been a problem.

If you can pick up another 15 arms at Rostov or anywhere else for that matter, he will be hurting for a while.

It will be interesting to see how HQBU helps you with the battle for Moscow.

I don't thk I need HQBU for the attack no Moscow, as you can see how close RH's are. Turn 13 on will start going from near VL and the other is headed for Tula already.

I will keep 1 MoT division in north and south thrust topped off with fuel for a raid to cut rail lines if I get an opening.

The crossing assault would start with 6 infantry divisions -90 morale, then the 6+ 90 morale would assault across with panzers in RM. Next to impossible to stop as fort levels would drop. The 2nd turn would finish it off IF the first turn did not work anyways.

My new Leningrad assault set-up only requires 6 Panzer units after turn 6 and same for southern push.

Worked great vs Shermanny and smokendave, but vs Saper not as good.

All good games.
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”