Rising Sun, Falling Skys

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

spence
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by spence »

On Dec 8 the Japanese figured they had caught the Allies completely flat footed. Sending the B-17s to the bases in Formosa probably would have caught the Japanese bombers just getting off the ground and may not have encountered any CAP at all. In any case, the B-17s operated higher than the Japanese fighters could handle. Such a raid might have saved Cavite and the Philippine fighter force for a few weeks.

Bill

Interesting speculation but would muck this game for the Japanese Player so bad he would never recover. Be an interesting possibility only in a game that was limited to the PI/DEI/Malaya and ended after 100 turns or so like the Rising Sun Scenario in vanilla WitP. A tactical disaster/problem early on might by skillful Jappanese play be overcome in the short term.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

I started reading it yesterday, it is good but a bit too "informal" at least compared to the other titles I recently read (Kaigun, Shattered sword, any HP Willmott book)

Too opinionated with little support, too much hyperbole, with questionable, non serious descriptions like comparing the float planes following Force Z to "paparazzi"

That said, I couldn't put it down until the end of the chapter dealing with Force Z
User avatar
RogerJNeilson
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:21 am
Location: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by RogerJNeilson »

Finished it yesterday, what a shambles.....

I have a new take on all those accumulates damage points we see in the game. Reading this book I am tempted to suggest that they aren't enough... just about any action by any of the ships featured in the book results in some damage of some kind.....

And as for every gun having a 'shot life'........

Roger
An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released
Cholmondeley Warner
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:45 am

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by Cholmondeley Warner »

As noted above, it's a real page turner. Perhaps not the most accomplished piece of non-fiction writing, but raw and riveting. And, as a WITP fan, it's written for us! So many references to obscure places and units that, to most people would mean nothing, but to WITP fans these references will evoke moments and times in your own gameplay (well, did with me anyway!)

User avatar
DSwain
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: United Kingdom

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by DSwain »

(sorry, posted in my main profile login for some reason above - my bad)

As noted above, it's a real page turner. Perhaps not the most accomplished piece of non-fiction writing, but raw and riveting. And, as a WITP fan, it's written for us! So many references to obscure places and units that, to most people would mean nothing, but to WITP fans these references will evoke moments and times in your own gameplay (well, did with me anyway!)
Image
wolfclan
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:21 pm

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wolfclan »

I found some of the naval terminology he used unusual. Not sure if the author needed a better editor, or that he is uncomfortable using naval expressions. I especially found strange that he always described a particular Japanese cruiser as "luxurious", yet he never explained why he thought that. Overall, I thought it an excellent book, well worth the read.
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wdolson »

Which cruiser?

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 41916
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by warspite1 »

Chokai iirc - Mikawa's flagship at Savo.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wdolson »

I have read, though I can't find any information on it now, that a US Navy cruiser (I recall it was the Indianapolis) was outfitted for presidential use before the war with a luxury suite. I don't believe FDR ever used it though.

The Chokai may have been similarly outfitted for VIP use. Though I am just speculating.

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
wolfclan
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:21 pm

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wolfclan »

warspite is correct: CHOKAI. I don't think I've ever heard a warship described as luxurious before this book. But I reiterate, as a criticism, this is a nitpick. I thought the book very good.
wolfclan
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:21 pm

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wolfclan »

I would guess you are thinking of AUGUSTA. FDR actually used it for meetings with Churchill. It had been the Asiatic flagship. But like you, I have no specific knowledge about any luxury suite for FDR.
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by Buckrock »

The four Takao class cruisers were built to serve as flagships when required. For this purpose, they were given a far larger forward superstructure than previous Japanese cruisers so as to allow for the increased command and accomodation requirements.

The standard historical references fail to make it clear whether restaurants, bars, swimming pools and deck tennis courts were included in the flagship package.

The USS Houston and USS Augusta (and IIRC the Chicago) were also built as flagships with increased accomodation and bridge facilities compared to the rest of their class.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by Buckrock »

ORIGINAL: wolfclan

I would guess you are thinking of AUGUSTA. FDR actually used it for meetings with Churchill. It had been the Asiatic flagship. But like you, I have no specific knowledge about any luxury suite for FDR.

There's several accounts out there suggesting that during the USS Augusta's 1941 refit (after returning from service with the Asiatic Fleet) that accomodation and facilities suitable for FDR's special requirements were added. This may have included a reportedly "luxurious" Presidential cabin and bathroom.

On the other hand, the USS Houston also had served at times during the 30's as FDR's "personal cruiser" but according to Hornfischer's "Ship of Ghost's", the changes to the ship were only makeshift ones done for the duration of the President's stay.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wdolson »

At one point the Iowa had a presidential bath installed too.

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
spence
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by spence »

The four Takao class cruisers were built to serve as flagships when required. For this purpose, they were given a far larger forward superstructure than previous Japanese cruisers so as to allow for the increased command and accomodation requirements.

Interesting that the IJN did that for surface ships but failed to do so for the KB (even on the two new "kakus"). "Shattered Sword" mentions that the small size of Akagi's bridge and the consequent crowd was hardly conducive to decision making by Nagumo during the crucial morning of June 4th.
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2226
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by Miller »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

It is only depressing if you are cheering for ABDA [;)]

ABBA would probably have done better.
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: spence
The four Takao class cruisers were built to serve as flagships when required. For this purpose, they were given a far larger forward superstructure than previous Japanese cruisers so as to allow for the increased command and accomodation requirements.

Interesting that the IJN did that for surface ships but failed to do so for the KB (even on the two new "kakus"). "Shattered Sword" mentions that the small size of Akagi's bridge and the consequent crowd was hardly conducive to decision making by Nagumo during the crucial morning of June 4th.

The Japanese were concerned about making carriers too top heavy, which influenced the design of the island. The Japanese were also fond of putting two level hangers on carriers, and they sacrificed a lot for that. The Rhyujo was dangerously top heavy because of the two hangers, it was rebuilt twice before the war in attempts to mitigate the top heaviness.

Why they didn't build a command operations center/bridge lower down from the island is beyond me.

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: Rising Sun, Falling Skys

Post by Buckrock »

ORIGINAL: spence
Interesting that the IJN did that for surface ships but failed to do so for the KB (even on the two new "kakus"). "Shattered Sword" mentions that the small size of Akagi's bridge and the consequent crowd was hardly conducive to decision making by Nagumo during the crucial morning of June 4th.

Lundstrom in the "First Team" books mentions Nagumo commanding from the Shokaku's flag plot during the Eastern Solomons Battle. It's clear from Lundstrom's description that this was a separate room to the navigation bridge. It would seem the Shokaku had the island space the Akagi may have lacked.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”