bombing question

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
bush
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:32 pm
Location: san jose, ca
Contact:

bombing question

Post by bush »

If I use a TB with bombs against a land target - is their a "bomber" penalty if it flies below 6,000 feet?
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 9812
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: bombing question

Post by PaxMondo »

when bombing land targets, TB's look like LB's in all respects. So, yes.
Pax
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 12800
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: bombing question

Post by btd64 »

Flak also gets a little thick.[:D][:D][:D]....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
New Game Development Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: bombing question

Post by witpqs »

I thought that the category of Level Bombers was broken down like this:

Level Bombers
- Heavy Bombers
- Medium Bombers
-- Attack Bombers
- Light Bombers

Do Light Bombers suffer that penalty? I thought it was only Heavy Bombers and non-Attack Medium Bombers.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7191
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: bombing question

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I thought that the category of Level Bombers was broken down like this:

Level Bombers
- Heavy Bombers
- Medium Bombers
-- Attack Bombers
- Light Bombers

Do Light Bombers suffer that penalty? I thought it was only Heavy Bombers and non-Attack Medium Bombers.

I've always understood it to mean all non-attack bombers.

Likely we will need Alfred to chime in to set us all straight.
Hans

User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: bombing question

Post by crsutton »

I doubt it. Some early models (swordfish) only carry one bomb so how could they be halved? Not sure about twin engine planes such as the beaufort but as I understand it they all (torpedo planes) use the same bomb load listed for long range missions anyways which is already a reduced load. Actually TBF at short to medium range could carry quite a large bomb load. Up to four 500 pound bombs if I recall.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: bombing question

Post by wdolson »

The TBF's bomb bay was pretty decent size. There were also hard points on the wings that were wet on later models. This allowed them to carry drop tanks on the external shackles.

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: bombing question

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

This is from my current DBB-C PBEM game; I have no issues with my British Swordfish I bombing at 1,000 feet


Morning Air attack on Port Blair , at 46,58

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 6,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Allied aircraft
Swordfish I x 12

No Allied losses

Airbase hits 3
Runway hits 12

Aircraft Attacking:
12 x Swordfish I bombing from 1000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 500 lb GP Bomb



By the way, my opponent is also having "lots of fun" bombing at low altitude:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Gorong at 81,111
Weather in hex: Severe storms
Raid spotted at 13 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 37
B5N2 Kate x 27

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 5 damaged
B5N2 Kate: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
SOC-1 Seagull: 4 destroyed

Allied Ships
CL Boise, Bomb hits 4, and is sunk
CA Pensacola, Bomb hits 1
DD John D. Edwards, Bomb hits 1
DD Alden

Aircraft Attacking:
25 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 1000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb

Magazine explodes on CL Boise
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: bombing question

Post by crsutton »

Well, if the swordfish is dropping "two" 500 lb bombs then that answers the original question. There seems to be no penalty for low level attacks. Also, puts to bed be my statement that they use the reduced long range bomb load instead which would only be one 500 lb bomb. Thanks Jorge for clearing it up.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
bush
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:32 pm
Location: san jose, ca
Contact:

RE: bombing question

Post by bush »

Thanks to all contributors!

Mike
User avatar
dcpollay
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:58 am
Location: Upstate New York USA

RE: bombing question

Post by dcpollay »

My impression was that the low-level bomber penalty was for accuracy, not payload. Are we all talking about the same subject here?
"It's all according to how your boogaloo situation stands, you understand."

Formerly known as Colonel Mustard, before I got Slitherine Syndrome.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: bombing question

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Colonel Mustard

My impression was that the low-level bomber penalty was for accuracy, not payload. Are we all talking about the same subject here?
You might be mixing metaphors. As far as pilots go, there are skills for ground bombing versus low-ground bombing. Also for naval bombing versus low-naval bombing. Those certainly influence accuracy.

Separately, certain aircraft types get their payload halved when they bomb from low level.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: bombing question

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Colonel Mustard

My impression was that the low-level bomber penalty was for accuracy, not payload. Are we all talking about the same subject here?


Payload, it is halved.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
blueatoll
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:29 pm

RE: bombing question

Post by blueatoll »

So if I set my altitude for 6000' with TBDs and have them set on a primary mission of Naval Attack and secondary mission of Ground Attack will my TBDs still be able to do torpedo attacks successfully if a naval target presents itself?

I was wondering why my Avengers were performing so terribly v. historical on ground attacks.
Thanks
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: bombing question

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

Yes, TB will fly at 6,000 then drop to 100 for torpedo run, and then go back to 6,000

If you setup a secondary mission of ground bombing, then it will do level bombing at 6,000 on the afternoon phase, assuming of course primary (naval) target was not found

How good is the DL of the target? how good is the pilot's ground bombing skill?
These 2 will have more importance than the plane used
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: bombing question

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: blueatoll

So if I set my altitude for 6000' with TBDs and have them set on a primary mission of Naval Attack and secondary mission of Ground Attack will my TBDs still be able to do torpedo attacks successfully if a naval target presents itself?

I was wondering why my Avengers were performing so terribly v. historical on ground attacks.
Thanks


Yes, but what that has to do with the original post, I don't know...[;)]
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
blueatoll
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:29 pm

RE: bombing question

Post by blueatoll »

The 6000' part of the question. TBDs default to 5000' for Nav Attack. Thought that was the required altitude.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: bombing question

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: blueatoll

The 6000' part of the question. TBDs default to 5000' for Nav Attack. Thought that was the required altitude.
Ah! Those default settings don't really mean much. The display that we see always shows the most recent selection for the group's various settings, so when a group first arrives (even at game start) it has to have something there.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: bombing question

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: blueatoll

So if I set my altitude for 6000' with TBDs and have them set on a primary mission of Naval Attack and secondary mission of Ground Attack will my TBDs still be able to do torpedo attacks successfully if a naval target presents itself?

I was wondering why my Avengers were performing so terribly v. historical on ground attacks.
Thanks


Yes, but what that has to do with the original post, I don't know...[;)]

Had to do with post #14

cheers
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”