ORIGINAL: Orm
Maybe bad was not the correct word for it.
I suspect that China was happy with the situation before the Kunming disaster. In my opinion China should abstain from any serious attacks until Japan is engaged elsewhere and US is in the war.
Well, of course the Chinese were happy : not taking losses is a rather comfortable situation. Anyway, this has changed this turn. They lost an inf and 2BP to strat bombing.
Not to mention the Kunming warlord...
Actually, I find the "not being attacked" situation more difficult to manage (as the Chinese player) : the country is huge, and because the Japanese are not engaged they are pretty free to do whatever fancy them... The Kungmin operation is a good exemple. As a result, the Chinese are now retreating to a tighter defense ring, so that units can move faster to threatened ares: a 2 movement factor Chinese inf takes eons to reach the other side of China! This is a rather serious liability which I had not analyzed but that reinforces my strategy.
Also note that currently, even with some disorganized units, my partisan rating in China is as low as 6%. I'm still waiting to see the first Chinese partisan.
----
What I wanted to know was if the Japanese capture of Kunming had changed the Japanese strategy in any way.
No, not really : the strategic issue is that once you're embroidered in a serious land action against China, you are both (in my view) uselessly using resources (that can be best used elsewhere) and you lose much of your freedom to act.
Tactically, I may consider the capture of the southwest Chinese resource, to route it through Vietnam. But this involves two "difficult" fights, possibly more as the situation evolves, that may not be in my interest of doing for a mere resource: there is a city to capture and some mountian hexes to secure. Probably not worth it unless an opportunity opens up. As an aside, that resource is also denied the Chinese : the Japanese militia prevents its use. Thats fine to me : one less BP goin to the Chinese...