Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Locked
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by mikmykWS »

Think you need fc and air detection radar added to sensors
So
Add 1760 STIR- ESSM +2MR, Adelaide + Nansen, Mk92 Mod 12....

Add some sort of air detection radar

Ex. 2674 AN/SPS-49

Add Correct missile mount (weapons's dialog)

ex. 624 Mk41 VLS [8 cells]

etc.

User avatar
hellfish6
Posts: 690
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:09 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by hellfish6 »

Curious. I've got an SPS-77, SPS-49, a STIR and a Mk92 with a 48-cell Mk41 (and 24 ESSM) and I'm still getting the 'Unable to connect to firing unit with mandatory datalink' message in the manual fire dialog.
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Mgellis »

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Yeah. Probably keep the NSA from reading our emails too as it is creepy.

I would just like to take this opportunity to apologize to the families of any brave NSA officers who died of boredom while listening in on my phone calls. Because I am quite sure that would be the outcome if anyone had to listen in on hours and hours of my daily routine. :)


User avatar
mikkey
Posts: 3173
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Slovakia

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by mikkey »

[:D][:D]
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: hellfish6

Curious. I've got an SPS-77, SPS-49, a STIR and a Mk92 with a 48-cell Mk41 (and 24 ESSM) and I'm still getting the 'Unable to connect to firing unit with mandatory datalink' message in the manual fire dialog.

Try mount 1663 Mk29 Sea Sparrow -ESSM, Add sensors: 1024 Mk95 (not 3746) and a search radar AN/SPS-48E.

This should work

Mike
Tomcat84
Posts: 1952
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:13 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Tomcat84 »

Couple of database requests:

Looking for a roughly 2018 3.2B F-22 Raptor which will highly likely have full Block 2 AIM-9X with HMD capabilities http://news.usni.org/2014/05/16/air-for ... 22-raptor/
Also looking for roughly 2022 F-35A and F-22 with GBU-53/B SDB II, as well as a roughly 2019 US Navy Super Hornet with SDB II capability http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/ray ... ion-06510/

(and probably also integration on F-16 and other platforms around the 2020 mark)

My thanks will be great as always :)
My Scenarios and Tutorials for Command

(Scenarios focus on air-warfare :) )
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

ORIGINAL: hellfish6

Curious. I've got an SPS-77, SPS-49, a STIR and a Mk92 with a 48-cell Mk41 (and 24 ESSM) and I'm still getting the 'Unable to connect to firing unit with mandatory datalink' message in the manual fire dialog.

Try mount 1663 Mk29 Sea Sparrow -ESSM, Add sensors: 1024 Mk95 (not 3746) and a search radar AN/SPS-48E.

This should work

Mike

Yeah you'll have to use a non-AEGIS version of the ESSM as those require a free datalink channel to fire, alternatively add an AEGIS datalink through the SBR script (INI file). No GUI for that yet, sorry!
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
Agiel
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:49 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Agiel »

Noticed that the F-16 and the F-15E are unable to carry the JSOW by default and that conversely legacy Hornets and Superhornets are unable to carry MALDs. Can this be rectified in an update of the database?

Sources:
http://www.raytheon.com.au/rtnwcm/group ... t_jsow.pdf

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases ... 36815.html
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

The USAF never really used the JSOW. They bought a handful which they passed on to the Navy.

Will take another look at the MALD when we get back, thanks [8D]
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

Also added request for F-22 and F-35, thanks! [8D]
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
FlyingBear
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:32 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by FlyingBear »

The Whiskey class submarines in the database have a Trout Cheek [MG-10 Feniks] listed as active only search. I believe that should be passive only. Notoriously hard to find online sources but FWIW here is one: http://www.harpoondatabases.com/Encyclo ... y1945.aspx

Also, makes little sense for a submarine to not have any passive sonar.
ParachuteProne
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:35 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ParachuteProne »

User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 11295
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Sardaukar »

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
slicendice
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:06 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by slicendice »

http://news.usni.org/2014/08/05/navy-sw ... -ddg-1000s

Bad news, the secondary guns on DDG-1000 will probably be downgraded from 57mm MK110 to 30mm MK46. It's a pretty risky decision consider the little capability the MK46 has as a CIWS gun. Anyways, the change will need to be reflected in the database.

And may I remind your guys that the AAQ-37 EO DAS is still non functional due to the lack of IRdetection/classification zoom(while having optical zoom although the sensor operates in IR band).
User avatar
RedLancer
Posts: 4338
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:09 am
Location: UK

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by RedLancer »

The CWDB already includes two British 'what if' ships that I'd like to include in a Falklands scenario.  Can these be copied over to the DB3000? (unless there is a way that I don't know about for using the data from both DBs in a single scenario)
 
The ships are:
Type 43 Destroyer
R01 Queen Elizabeth CVA-01
could you also add 
R08 Ark Royal (Audacious not Invincible flavour)
Also need the Royal Navy's 1978 fixed wing airgroup of Phantom FG.1/2, Gannet AEW.3 & COD.4 and Buccaneer S.2 for the airgroup. 
 
Is it also possible to add:
 
K08 RFA Engadine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFA_Engadine_(K08))
K07 HMS Challenger  (http://www.clydesite.co.uk/clydebuilt/viewship.asp?id=19388)
 
John
WitE2 Asst Producer
WitE & WitW Dev
TheOriginalOverlord
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Marines

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by TheOriginalOverlord »

Helicopter carrier Moskva has two SAN-3 magazines with 44 goblets each... Wiki and old harpoon says 22 missiles per launcher?


Also I made a request on the CWDB thread RE: Argentine A4 loadouts...do I need to put that here as well?
Semper Fi!

Jeremy

Image
greatTop
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 10:10 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by greatTop »

Hey guys, just bringing to your attention that the Italian FREMM Carlo Bergamini (F 590) is of the "general purpose" version and not ASW, as it was the first FREMM built I'm a bit suprised to only see the ASW version in the database whilst the first ship of the latter version was built later on.

Still regarding the Italian FREMMs (both versions), they decided in the end to equip them with "Sylver VLS A-50" cells and not "Sylver VLS A-43" making them able to hold both Aster 15&30 and not only the first one as it seems to me it's in the DB for now.

Thanks for you time, keep up the great work !

Cheers
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2162
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Mgellis »

When possible, please add...

Selex ES Falco
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falco_reconnaissance_drone
http://www.selex-es.com/documents/73744 ... sh_149.pdf <-- company brochure...what's not to love?
http://www.selex-es.com/-/falco-un-peacekeeping
http://www.selex-es.com/-/falco-saves-lives

Pakistan operates quite a few of these. Other countries seem interested in buying some.

Thanks for considering this one.
greatTop
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 10:10 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by greatTop »

ORIGINAL: greatTop

Hey guys, just bringing to your attention that the Italian FREMM Carlo Bergamini (F 590) is of the "general purpose" version and not ASW, as it was the first FREMM built I'm a bit suprised to only see the ASW version in the database whilst the first ship of the latter version was built later on.

Still regarding the Italian FREMMs (both versions), they decided in the end to equip them with "Sylver VLS A-50" cells and not "Sylver VLS A-43" making them able to hold both Aster 15&30 and not only the first one as it seems to me it's in the DB for now.

Thanks for you time, keep up the great work !

Cheers

I also noticed that the Italian FREMM "ASW" currently present on the DB has: 1x OTOmelara 76mm
1x OTOmelara 127mm

Those are the armaments of the the "general Purpose" version, the ASW should have 2x OTO Melara 76mm cannons.

Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”