Railgun FX???

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario, art and sound modding and the game editor for Distant Worlds.

Moderators: elliotg, Icemania

Post Reply
User avatar
Unforeseen
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:08 am
Location: United States of Disease

Railgun FX???

Post by Unforeseen »

So I decided to do some research on actual railguns while i was bored and i quickly realized that the DW portrayal of a railgun is completely wrong. They should be MORE effective against armor, not less. But that aside I'm curious if anyone has any more realistic Rail Gun FX sitting around collecting dust. The current vanilla option for it simply isn't a rail gun projectile..
ParagonExile
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:56 pm

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by ParagonExile »

Wouldn't a real railgun capable of being used in space travel like, at relativistic velocities and have hundreds of thousands of Kilometres of range on moving targets? And millions or billions on "static" targets"?

Nope, we get slow projectiles with no range and no hope.

But OT; a railgun wouldn't look like anything, it would be too small to see and move far too fast. They would leave a beastly shockwave in an atmosphere, but in space, naw. Every depiction of them in fiction with visuals is artistic license.

My suggestion we be to use a 2-D version of Mass Effect's magnetic accelerator cannons; link. Basically a long, blue "energy" torpedo thing with a long wispy tail.
User avatar
Solarius Scorch
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 6:55 pm
Location: Cracow, Poland
Contact:

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by Solarius Scorch »

Umm, I'm all for experiments, but show me one game with realistic weapons. :) In reality, the best weapons in space, at least by damage, is a piece of rock travelling at relativistic speeds. An armchair colliding with a spaceship at, say, 0.2 C (light speed) releases so much energy that fitting it with a nuclear bomb would be inconsequential.

Still, perhaps will lead to a better weapon profiling, since what we have now is completely counter-intuitive.
Forever Future 1.7 for Call to Power - the biggest mod for the best Civilization-like game ever!
User avatar
Unforeseen
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:08 am
Location: United States of Disease

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by Unforeseen »

ORIGINAL: ParagonExile
Nope, we get slow projectiles with no range and no hope.

But OT; a railgun wouldn't look like anything, it would be too small to see and move far too fast. They would leave a beastly shockwave in an atmosphere, but in space, naw. Every depiction of them in fiction with visuals is artistic license.

My suggestion we be to use a 2-D version of Mass Effect's magnetic accelerator cannons; link. Basically a long, blue "energy" torpedo thing with a long wispy tail.
Railguns are not fiction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnoM3TwD0U While true you wouldn't be able to see it with the naked eye it wouldn't look much like what it does in DW. Will take a look at the mass effect weapon you mentioned!

@Solarius: Let's say we are firing a reasonably sized shell(reasonable as in they are small enough to carry enough of them to be useful in multiple combats)at a large heavily armored spacecraft. The shell itself penetrates the armor and the hull and blows right through the ship. The immediate effect would be damage in that area of the ship. However if we fire the same shell with a nuclear warhead that detonates midway through the ship or even on the hull you create a much larger effect that could destroy the entire craft hypothetically.

I personally believe that projectile weapons WOULD be far superior than energy weapons in a scifi is real type of settings. They just would not be as efficient as the ammo would be finite as opposed to energy weapons which can be fired infinitely as long as their is still a source.
ParagonExile
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 12:56 pm

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by ParagonExile »

ORIGINAL: Unforeseen
Railguns are not fiction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnoM3TwD0U While true you wouldn't be able to see it with the naked eye it wouldn't look much like what it does in DW. Will take a look at the mass effect weapon you mentioned!

I know they're not fiction, I've actually seen one (incomplete mind you, and a non-functional prototype lol).

The Mass Effect/Halo route of "Very fast glowing bullet" is probably your best bet, looks cool too.

@Solarius: Let's say we are firing a reasonably sized shell(reasonable as in they are small enough to carry enough of them to be useful in multiple combats)at a large heavily armored spacecraft. The shell itself penetrates the armor and the hull and blows right through the ship. The immediate effect would be damage in that area of the ship. However if we fire the same shell with a nuclear warhead that detonates midway through the ship or even on the hull you create a much larger effect that could destroy the entire craft hypothetically.

I personally believe that projectile weapons WOULD be far superior than energy weapons in a scifi is real type of settings. They just would not be as efficient as the ammo would be finite as opposed to energy weapons which can be fired infinitely as long as their is still a source.

A much better way of doing things would be to encapsulate a lead projectile in a casing designed to flatten on impact rather than just shatter. Instead of punching right through the enemy ship and exerting minimal force on it, a flattening projectile would exert the full force of the impact where it landed, and it would explode like a megaton-level nuclear weapon without the expensive internal bomb.

Then there's also the issue of missed shots, which will keep flying until they hit something, whereas a laser would decohere into benign radiation after a few hundred trillion kilometres at most.

You know what's really impractical though? Fighting in space. Damn it would suck.
User avatar
Solarius Scorch
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 6:55 pm
Location: Cracow, Poland
Contact:

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by Solarius Scorch »

ORIGINAL: Unforeseen
@Solarius: Let's say we are firing a reasonably sized shell(reasonable as in they are small enough to carry enough of them to be useful in multiple combats)at a large heavily armored spacecraft. The shell itself penetrates the armor and the hull and blows right through the ship. The immediate effect would be damage in that area of the ship. However if we fire the same shell with a nuclear warhead that detonates midway through the ship or even on the hull you create a much larger effect that could destroy the entire craft hypothetically.

No, they'd annihilate with the ship immediately, releasing a f**kton of raw energy. :P Unless we're talking slow missiles, but in space it would be easy to make really fast missiles. (Speed as relative to the target of course.)

ORIGINAL: Unforeseen
I personally believe that projectile weapons WOULD be far superior than energy weapons in a scifi is real type of settings. They just would not be as efficient as the ammo would be finite as opposed to energy weapons which can be fired infinitely as long as their is still a source.

Yes, exactly. It was nicely done in the Stardrive game, where kinetic weapons were much stronger than energy beams, but the logistics were problematic, while for beams you just needed a working ship reactor.
Forever Future 1.7 for Call to Power - the biggest mod for the best Civilization-like game ever!
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 4871
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: Unforeseen

So I decided to do some research on actual railguns while i was bored and i quickly realized that the DW portrayal of a railgun is completely wrong. They should be MORE effective against armor, not less. But that aside I'm curious if anyone has any more realistic Rail Gun FX sitting around collecting dust. The current vanilla option for it simply isn't a rail gun projectile..

tm.asp?m=3210900
Image
User avatar
lurchi
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:25 pm
Location: LV-223

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by lurchi »

ORIGINAL: Unforeseen

However if we fire the same shell with a nuclear warhead that detonates midway through the ship or even on the hull you create a much larger effect that could destroy the entire craft hypothetically.

That sounds very much like a transform cannon from Perry Rhodan.
unidterror
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:16 am

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by unidterror »

i have some railgun graphics, I made awhile back. There is engine thruster, and wave weapons, and torpedos, enhanced beams, they still compatible with any version.
Attachments
zipspritesCopy.zip
(435.34 KiB) Downloaded 39 times
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 4871
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Railgun FX???

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: unidterror

i have some railgun graphics, I made awhile back. There is engine thruster, and wave weapons, and torpedos, enhanced beams, they still compatible with any version.

Yep yours is the link I posted up above. [:)] Thanks for the rest looks great!
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Design and Modding”