B17 as a fighter plane

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
guctony
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:56 am

B17 as a fighter plane

Post by guctony »

Has anybody tried to pilot B-17s with fighter pilot with high Air spects.

Also historically transfering bomber pilots to figter planes was a common thing in IJN.
"Unless a nation's life faces peril, war is murder."
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken."
"After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."
Mustafa Kemal
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by crsutton »

Since B17s have not maneuver so to speak, I don't think it matters. With bombers it is the defensive rating that helps them shoot down enemy fighters. So, I am pretty sure it would not make a difference. Early in the game I seem to recall that there was an issue with attack bombers shooting down obscene amounts of enemy fighters with their forward firing weapons but that was addressed.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
guctony
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:56 am

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by guctony »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Since B17s have not maneuver so to speak, I don't think it matters. With bombers it is the defensive rating that helps them shoot down enemy fighters. So, I am pretty sure it would not make a difference. Early in the game I seem to recall that there was an issue with attack bombers shooting down obscene amounts of enemy fighters with their forward firing weapons but that was addressed.

Its good to know that in bombers only defensive ratings will work. If Air rating was also in effect it would be very interesting and dangerous.
"Unless a nation's life faces peril, war is murder."
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken."
"After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."
Mustafa Kemal
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6397
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by JeffroK »

The JFB complain about them as it is, dont give them more ammo to fire [8D]

Why not try it Guctony and report back.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: guctony

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Since B17s have not maneuver so to speak, I don't think it matters. With bombers it is the defensive rating that helps them shoot down enemy fighters. So, I am pretty sure it would not make a difference. Early in the game I seem to recall that there was an issue with attack bombers shooting down obscene amounts of enemy fighters with their forward firing weapons but that was addressed.

Its good to know that in bombers only defensive ratings will work. If Air rating was also in effect it would be very interesting and dangerous.

Pilot air rating is a factor. You should read more closely what crsutton actually wrote.

Alfred
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Since B17s have not maneuver so to speak, I don't think it matters. With bombers it is the defensive rating that helps them shoot down enemy fighters. So, I am pretty sure it would not make a difference. Early in the game I seem to recall that there was an issue with attack bombers shooting down obscene amounts of enemy fighters with their forward firing weapons but that was addressed.

Ummm, not really. Still an issue. B-25D1 is the second best sweeper on the map after the P-47. Send them in with 4E and it's like having escorts.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by koniu »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Since B17s have not maneuver so to speak, I don't think it matters. With bombers it is the defensive rating that helps them shoot down enemy fighters. So, I am pretty sure it would not make a difference. Early in the game I seem to recall that there was an issue with attack bombers shooting down obscene amounts of enemy fighters with their forward firing weapons but that was addressed.

Ummm, not really. Still an issue. B-25D1 is the second best sweeper on the map after the P-47. Send them in with 4E and it's like having escorts.
+1

B-25D1 is a b..ch. If You see that Jap fighter is making frontal attack You can say bye bye to frame and pilot. 1:1 ratio against them is a good day for Japan.
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Since B17s have not maneuver so to speak, I don't think it matters. With bombers it is the defensive rating that helps them shoot down enemy fighters. So, I am pretty sure it would not make a difference. Early in the game I seem to recall that there was an issue with attack bombers shooting down obscene amounts of enemy fighters with their forward firing weapons but that was addressed.

Ummm, not really. Still an issue. B-25D1 is the second best sweeper on the map after the P-47. Send them in with 4E and it's like having escorts.

Interesting, thought it was taken care of. I have not watched an air to air combat replay in about four years. Perhaps, I should...[;)]
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by Yaab »

That is the problem with frontal attacks by fighters. How can a B-25 aim with its nose MGs if the attack is performed as a high frontal attack? Nose MGs should only score hits with direct frontal attacks , though I do not see fighters performing such attacks - it is either a low frontal or a high frontal one. Even B-25's wing MGs shouldn't be scoring hits - just the TT (top turret) should score kills.
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by wdolson »

There is also the issue of the lack of a gunsight. Some B-25s had one for the pilot, but most didn't.

The B-25 also didn't have any wing guns. All of the fixed forward firing machine guns were either in the nose or were in package guns along the side of the fuselage.

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6397
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: B17 as a fighter plane

Post by JeffroK »

I looked through my TRACKER data and found very few kills for aircraft like the B25, A26 or Beaufighter, a couple of pilots with 1-3 kills, certainly no Richard Bong's amongst the Bomber pilots.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”