ORIGINAL: DSwain
ORIGINAL: jcjordan
I take it that The Daily Mail is UK equivalent to National Enquirer w/ I'm Bigfoots love child stories?
That would be fine - such newspapers are comics and they know it. Problem with The Daily Mail is that it takes itself seriously. Its stock in trade is xenophobia, racism, sexism and hysteria. I'm no left winger (my daily newspapers are The Daily Telegraph and The Financial Times, one beloved of retired Army colonels and the other of stockbrokers). The Mail is, in my opinion, only a thin shade short of being evil.
By the way, I do not subscribe to the idea that readers slavishly follow their preferred newspaper (people read newspapers for sport, culture, reviews etc, not only news and political slant) and I know that the Mail has an incredible level of coverage about 'celebrity' (not my cup of tea, but what the heck). I think the newspaper is awful, I'm not necessarily saying all of its readers are.
warspite1
Evil? Wow.
Incredible level of celebrity eh? Er... no not really. They have the odd bit devoted to such stuff but not much and I think you are confusing the Mail with the red tops.
Racism? Er... no again! The paper campaigned tirelessly for justice for Stephen Lawrence and were brave enough (unlike other papers) to name the "guilty" - remember that? Other newspaper editors applauded their bravery.
Racism? who was in the forefront of the campaign for justice for the Gurkha soldiers?
Racism? Sorry but I had hoped we had moved on from the time - just a few years ago under New Labour - when to mention the I - word was to be branded a screaming racist. The Daily Mail is not racist just because it doesn't believe an immigration policy should consist of doing
nothing when the country is growing at the size of Birmingham every 7 seconds and halting any debate by branding people who question said policy as Adolf Hitler's love children. I thought we'd all grown up a bit since then? They are questioning, that is all.
Sexism? Given the readership make-up that comment is just ridiculous - unless you think they are sexist against blokes. Would you prefer they replaced Fred Bassett with Andy Capp or George and Lynn?
Xenophobia? Can't think of anything particular to support that.
Hysteria? Yes guilty as charged - they are no different to any other paper, they need to attract sales in a rapidly shrinking market.
And finally, the Mail has one huge thing going for it - it doesn't have Polly Toynbee writing for it....[;)]