Japan aircraft choice

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
ndworl
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:23 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Japan aircraft choice

Post by ndworl »

Looking at my late 1942 choices, I wonder has anyone tried the Nick A as a day interceptor? I'm just getting Tojos and they are a nice jump up over the ACA2, but I think I have to build Nicks anyway, or the relevant air groups won't arrive, so I may as well think about optimum use for them.

They appear to have some characteristics better than the Tony, in firepower and toughness. They have 1 x 20mm cannon compared to the Tony's 2, but 4 x 12.7mm MG, compared to 2 for the Tony. Now both of these weapons are slightly less accurate than the ones on the Tony, but volume of fire must count for something. As I say, I plan to build some anyway, so will try them out, but has anyone tried this?
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by tocaff »

Nicks make nice targets for Corsairs, Thunderbolts, Lightnings, Hellcats, etc.
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
User avatar
Capt
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Pacific Time Zone

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by Capt »

Great against unescorted Heavy bombers. Think of tem as a JU 88 with "Jazz Music"
"Hit first ! Hit hard ! Keep on hitting ! ! (The 3 H's)"

Jacky Fisher
User avatar
Capt
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Pacific Time Zone

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by Capt »

"Hit first ! Hit hard ! Keep on hitting ! ! (The 3 H's)"

Jacky Fisher
ndworl
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:23 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by ndworl »

I was thinking of putting wings on mine. Yes, work against unescorted bombers only.
BPRE
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Stockholm,Sweden

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by BPRE »


It's cheaper if you don't add the wings. You don't have to pay for the engines then [:D] The end result will be pretty much the same anyway...

To be a bit more serious I wonder if you can use them in anything else than a nightfighting group. The options for those groups are not the same as for day groups. Daytime you only have the option of Airfield attack, Port attack, Sweep, Long range CAP and Training only.

Best regards
BPRE
ndworl
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:23 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by ndworl »

Sweep my own airfield perhaps, in the hope of running into enemy bombers? As you say, it would have the same effect.
BPRE
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Stockholm,Sweden

RE: Japan aircraft choice

Post by BPRE »

Never tried but it might work. Otherwise you have Long Range CAP too. That works.

Sweep might not intercept incoming aircraft. A similar example is Long Range CAP over an enemy airbase which in my experience doesn't help out if you attack with other aircraft and the enemy has CAP. It's shown on the screen but I don't think it participates.

/BPRE
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”