Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post accounts of your memorable victories and defeats here for other wargamers to share.

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky

Post Reply
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

Mark and I restarted our EA game. The AAR for the old game can be found here. This time around we opted to modify the scenario in the following ways:

1. A supply point was put into Riga for the Baltic States because they wither out of supply once Brest Litovsk is taken.
2. The Paris supply point was moved to Orleans to force the French to defend a larger area if they want to withdraw and just fortify around Paris.
3. We instituted a house rule that basically states that units in "E" and "F" entrenchment status cannot be set on Ignore Losses with the following exceptions:
- nation capital city hexes
- highly strategic hexes (eg hexes that trigger significant game events
- places where defenders cannot retreat (eg islands like Malta, but not like Crete where defenders have space to flee)
- any unit with 0 of 0 movement points (eg coastal artillery, Maginot/Siegfried Forts and such)

We think these changes will lead to a much more fluid game, so here we go.

July 22, 1939

Hitler claims "border provocations" by the Polish Army and invades! The Poles do their best to withdraw towards Warsaw to setup a defence of the city:



Image
Attachments
Poland4.jpg
Poland4.jpg (224.33 KiB) Viewed 785 times
governato
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:35 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by governato »

what are the entrenchment/engineering rates in EA? I find that in large scale, weekly turn scenarios they have to be turned low to keep the action 'fluid' as it was typical in WWII warfare.
Basically the times for a unit to go from supply 'red' to 'green' has to be shorter than the time it takes for a unit to go from mobile to Fortified status.
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

80/100. It does probably need to be lowered.
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

July 29, 1939

Britain and France declare war on Germany!

Joseph Stalin order the Red Army into Finland during a particularly muddy week. Finnish forces withdraw along all fronts except in the far north at Petsamo and in the far south at the Mannerheim line.



Image
Attachments
Finland5North.jpg
Finland5North.jpg (407.49 KiB) Viewed 785 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

Along the Mannerheim Line, the Finnish Army redeploys to provide coverage along the entire line. The Red Army attempts to exploit this lack of readiness by attacking straight through the center of the Mannerheim Line. A neighboring Finnish half corps in tactical reserve joins combat. The Red Army attacks several times but is unable to dislodge the defenders. However, the prepared Mannerheim Forts in this sector are evaporated.

STAVKA totally forgets to order the Red Air force to blow the bridges in Finland. Doh!


Image
Attachments
Finland5South.jpg
Finland5South.jpg (171.36 KiB) Viewed 785 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

Polish Front:

With all the reshuffling of British, French and Red Army units, Allied GHQ completely forgets about the Polish front. Doh again!



Image
Attachments
Poland5.jpg
Poland5.jpg (309.45 KiB) Viewed 785 times
secadegas
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:47 am

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by secadegas »

ORIGINAL: governato

what are the entrenchment/engineering rates in EA?

Having some experience with your scenario (20% entrenchment level) and a lot with experience with EA (80% entrenchment) i have been thinking about that same exact question myself lately.

As a rule of thumb...
Germans are very much alike on both scenarios: most infantry units have around 60% to 70% engineering capacity. Pz or mobile units much more.
Early Soviets on EF almost don't have any engineering cap while most Soviets units in EA have 45% to 55%.
On EF later Soviets units (with more constrution sqd's) - even with 20% entrechment level - still fortified "too fast" (4/5 week turns).

In EA, as it is now, with 80% entrechement level and 50% (or more) unit engineering cap, every time you dig-in you get a new entrenchment degree meaning you'll have most your units fortified in just 3 turns.
My experience with EF (even with very low entrechement level) tells me that most of times players prefer not to counter-attack or move and try to dig-in their units in the hope of getting them to the next entrechment level with its obvious advantages. Unfortunately it's a sound option but it's not good for game flow.

Sorry to hijack your thread...


governato
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:35 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by governato »

Sekadegas: you make good points. In my experience with EF (mostly PBEM, mine and from other players) a lot depends on the supply level of the defender. Low supply makes going into D, E or F status much harder) and the artillery of the attacker. Guard armies together with well supplied Red Army artillery in 1943 are able to retreat a German Korp with LL/F status and 150% Supply. The front is really not that static as I would like as the Axis :). Testing later in the game will be very useful as I am now at turn 115.

Btw, I will be following this AAR with interest!
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

August 5, 1939

All quiet on the Western Front.

Polish Front:

The Germans assault Warsaw. Only one battered corps remains in the city, however an early turn end saves the defenders to live to fight another day. A combination of fresh defenders from outside the city and the units that just retreated make their way back into the city for a last stand...



Image
Attachments
Poland6.jpg
Poland6.jpg (59.68 KiB) Viewed 785 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

Finnish Front:

In the north, the Finns continue to withdraw blowing bridges as they go. In the south, the Mannerheim Line has been reinforced by a fresh corps, which will make breaking the line much more difficult. Red Army forces launch attacks on two parts of the line, but the turn ends after one combat resolution. Perhaps another day...




Image
Attachments
Finland6.jpg
Finland6.jpg (162.8 KiB) Viewed 785 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

August 12, 1939

All quiet on the Western Front.

Polish Front:

The Germans assault Warsaw again, but fail to take the city. The remaining defenders are severely weakened and it's only a matter of time now...




Image
Attachments
Poland7.jpg
Poland7.jpg (81.04 KiB) Viewed 787 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

Finnish Front:

In the north, the Finns continue to withdraw but appear to be preparing to make a stand outside the city of Kumi behind the blown bridge.

In the south, the Red Air force gets to work blowing bridges leading out of Helsinki this week and Red Army forces pounds away at Finland's III corps, holding the far right of the line. It was battered in previous battles but despite taking a beating, the corps stands its ground.


Image
Attachments
Finland7.jpg
Finland7.jpg (56.29 KiB) Viewed 787 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

August 19, 1939

Polish Front:

The Germans assault Warsaw and seize it. Based on what is occupying the hex, my two beat up corps really didn't stand a chance in the counter-attack, but for Polish honour they had to make an attempt:

Image

Western Front:

The Luftwaffe transfers west en masse and blows a large number of bridges in France. For operational security reasons, no screen capture is available.



Attachments
Poland8.jpg
Poland8.jpg (130.26 KiB) Viewed 787 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

Finnish Front:

In the north, the Red Army brings up engineers to repair bridges while forming up its combat forces.

In the south, the Red Army continues to pound away hard at Finland's III Corps holding the far right of the Mannerheim Line. The fortifications give the Finns heart as they refuse to retreat. Two reserve brigades (on tactical reserve.. Mark is quite judicious about using this deployment) join the fray, but one reserve brigade is forced to retreat.

The Red Army commander in his after action report writes about the "extremely high morale" of this corps. It should be noted that the original offensive against the line was pursued most vigorously against the center, which was held by III Corps. After the corps was relieved in the line by I Corps, it transferred to the far right and it is here the Red Army has shifted the main focus of its attack.

The Red Army continues to rotate fresh corps into the line each week to start the assault anew. STAVKA anticipates that Finland must reinforce this sector of the line or it will eventually break. STAVKA believes that there are no uncommitted reserves at this point, therefore some other section of the front must be weakened. Large forces stand ready everywhere to take advantage of any such redeployment...


Image
Attachments
Finland8.jpg
Finland8.jpg (109.24 KiB) Viewed 787 times
Cfant
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:16 am

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by Cfant »

I wonder, that you attack the Fins from overstacked hexfields and with ignore losses setting. Doesn't it result in a lot of "continues", which burn your turn, and extremly high casualities?
User avatar
Ruppich
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:41 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by Ruppich »

..
3. We instituted a house rule that basically states that units in "E" and "F" entrenchment status cannot be set on Ignore Losses with the following exceptions:
...
im reading this rule in conjunction with the "E" multiple times in this forum. Its obvious that the IL Bug is appearing with the "F" Status but do "we" have solid data that the "E" status is bugged too??
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

ORIGINAL: Cfant2
I wonder, that you attack the Fins from overstacked hexfields and with ignore losses setting. Doesn't it result in a lot of "continues", which burn your turn, and extremly high casualities?

From a purely TOAW standpoint, those two things are sort of mutually exclusive. Attackers break off typically due to losses sustained (or a failed morale check), so the higher the density penalties the higher the losses the attackers will sustain which means they will break off earlier. Red Army units will fail many morale checks, especially when they are no longer fresh. You can use this fact to your advantage (hint: assault ratio is king).

To answer your question in this particular game, no and no. What you are seeing is a screenshot from the End of Turn. I rotate fresh units in mid-way through the turn and since its off-road movement. Anything that can't attack us set is IL for defensive purposes. At the start of the next turn, exhausted attackers withdraw before I initiate fresh attacks with reserves moved the last turn lowering density penalties. I do sometimes attack with IL, sometimes with LL, sometimes with ML and sometimes with limited attacks - it depends on the situation. I recall three combats in Finland so far that burned 3 tactical rounds and two of those times were when Mark's Tactical Reserve units joined a battle in progress.

Busting the Mannerheim line is totally dependent on taking advantage of the initial deployment. If the Finns recover and get back to full readiness/supply/entrenchment, give up trying to break it.
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

ORIGINAL: Ruppich
..
3. We instituted a house rule that basically states that units in "E" and "F" entrenchment status cannot be set on Ignore Losses with the following exceptions:
...
im reading this rule in conjunction with the "E" multiple times in this forum. Its obvious that the IL Bug is appearing with the "F" Status but do "we" have solid data that the "E" status is bugged too??

From a retreat cancellation perspective, a unit in "F" status has an 84% chance of cancelling a failed retreat check. "E" has a 65% chance, which is still high. "D" has a 25% chance. Those percentages only apply to the first tactical round, because that unit may lose its entrenchment status in that tactical round (which is why support assets are so important in 3.4).
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

August 26, 1939

All quiet on the Western Front.

Finnish Front:

IV Corps holding the flank of the Mannerheim Line attempts to withdraw but is engaged by the Soviet forces opposing it. This is an opportunity, however Red Army support assets are limited and STAVKA opts to continue pushing against III Corps of attacking IV Corps.


Image
Attachments
Finland9.jpg
Finland9.jpg (83.53 KiB) Viewed 787 times
sealclubber
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:58 pm

RE: Europe Aflame 2012 AAR: Mark Stevens vs sealclubber - Round 2

Post by sealclubber »

The Red Army utilizes fresh corps to pound away at III Corps again, which still refuses to retreat. The Mannerheim Fort itself is destroyed leaving an empty shell of III Corps. Red Army intelligence reports that III Corps has no more than 47 rifle squads remaining within its ranks. It seems III Corps will have to be killed to the last man and the last round.


Image
Attachments
Finland9LossReport.jpg
Finland9LossReport.jpg (78.87 KiB) Viewed 787 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”