ORIGINAL: Pelton
ORIGINAL: Speedy
ORIGINAL: bigbaba
it's like pelton said:
with a low moral russian army and a intact german army one can regain the lost territory easily in 42 and overrun the manpower centers in russia twice what will cause even more damage to them.
I agree. I'm beginning to think this ultimately need to be looked at as once the standard Axis response to first Blizzard is to Sir Robin and then 'guarantee' victory in 42 with little that the SU can do (especially the potential gamey absuse of giving up large Manpower Centres knowing when they're recaptured it will detriment the SU further) it will make the game a null and pointless endeavour for any SU player.
The "fix" would be to make city's worth something so both sides would fight over them. This would mean SHC manpower #s would have to be increased.
Right now the game is all about ball room dancing. Summer 41 SHC runs east, 41/42 winter GHC runs west and then as SHC figures out 42(few have) 42 SHC runs east. 1943 static and finally 1944-1945 both sides fight tooth and nail for land.
The game has gotten better and better as WitP has over the yrs. WitP was a mess for yrs before it is what it is now.
The wite game system is right, it just needs a few minor tweets and it would have the perfect feel we are all looking for.
I think its been clear now for 18 months what is needed, but for some reason 2by3 will not do it or can't code it.
1. A turn by turn VP system.
2. Tweek manpower output of SHC so it can take higher losses fighting forward.
3. Nerf the insane cav blizzard BS. Cav units are horses or lt tanks, not both as 2by3 has stated in past.
It is simply 100% not possible to lose less then 30 german divisions vs someone that knows how to exploit the current cav ruleset and this is 100% not historical. I lost 10 divisions running 2 hexes a turn vs Bobo and his losses were 3.5 million during 41. Its just not possible as GHC to fight forward during blizzard as it is 100% not possible to fight forward during 41 summer as SHC vs an average GHC player.
The player base is not stupid. We will not fight forward if the other side has an unhistorical unfar advantage.
41- 70
42- 60
43- 50
44- 45
45- 40
Something allong those lines would gave game less of a feel of ball room dancing and more like a cage death match.
They will get it right at some point.
Before I jeopardise this AAR I just wanted to say I agree with your overall sentiments here Pelton. I do think in an ideal world something should be done to strongly discourage Sir Robins whilst allowing a side the ability to conduct a strategic withdrawal if prudent.
Idaho - How many Guards Units have you got so far?