Why no Chester?
Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets
Why no Chester?
Nine of the ten Nimitz-class carriers are named in full e.g. Ronald Reagan and
Carl Vinson, while the tenth, is just Nimitz. Why is poor Chester not treated with this respect? Any ideas? I asked the knowledgable peeps on the WITP site but no joy. Not a major point but one that is annoying me.....[&:]
Carl Vinson, while the tenth, is just Nimitz. Why is poor Chester not treated with this respect? Any ideas? I asked the knowledgable peeps on the WITP site but no joy. Not a major point but one that is annoying me.....[&:]
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
RE: Why no Chester?
Everyone who would care KNOWS who the The USS Nimitz is named after. I don't think Chester is rolling over in his grave on this issue.
Flipper
- paulderynck
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Canada
RE: Why no Chester?
Maybe they didn't want any confusion with the least well known US president.
Paul
RE: Why no Chester?
Sorry mate I didn't understand that comment?
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
- paulderynck
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Canada
RE: Why no Chester?
Chester A. Arthur was the 21st US president and probably the name most likely to be missed if someone tried to recite them all. Perhaps I missed adding a smiley or something. [;)]
Anyway the comment was certainly not meant to offend anyone.
Anyway the comment was certainly not meant to offend anyone.
Paul
RE: Why no Chester?
I'm sure you didn't - except perhaps the descendents of the great President Chester [;)]
No paulderynck, your only crime was to deliver that in such a deadpan stylee that I thought it was a serious comment. Yes, a [;)] would have helped [;)]
Goodness, that's three [;)] - no four in one post. I feel like a right winker [;)] oh - there I go again!
No paulderynck, your only crime was to deliver that in such a deadpan stylee that I thought it was a serious comment. Yes, a [;)] would have helped [;)]
Goodness, that's three [;)] - no four in one post. I feel like a right winker [;)] oh - there I go again!
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
- Sewerlobster
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:40 pm
- Location: Reading, Pa. USA
RE: Why no Chester?
Well for what it's worth the CVN-69 was originally named the USS Eisenhower but they changed the name on 25 May 1970(wiki). I would presume that someone in Washington decided that ships named after real people would carry the full name from then on.
Why choose the lesser evil: Vote Cthulhu.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm
RE: Why no Chester?
maybe the Spruance class DD's set a precedent this way?
and since we have a Nimitz thread, I'll ask Nimitz trivia:
What movie did this CV have a starring role in?
Bonus question: which wargame has a cameo?
and since we have a Nimitz thread, I'll ask Nimitz trivia:
What movie did this CV have a starring role in?
Bonus question: which wargame has a cameo?
RE: Why no Chester?
My bet for the movie is "The Final Countdown". No idea on the wargame.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
RE: Why no Chester?
There was an unofficial "Final Countdown" Scenario for "War in the Pacific" [&:]
Phil
Phil
Author, Space Opera (FGU); RBB #1 (FASA); Road to Armageddon; Farm, Forge and Steam; Orbis Mundi; Displaced (PGD)
----------------------------------------------
Email: aspqrz@tpg.com.au
----------------------------------------------
Email: aspqrz@tpg.com.au
RE: Why no Chester?
ORIGINAL: Orm
My bet for the movie is "The Final Countdown". No idea on the wargame.
The film where a modern nuclear US carrier travels accidentally in time and arrives just before the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
RE: Why no Chester?
Yes. That is The Final Countdown.ORIGINAL: micheljq
ORIGINAL: Orm
My bet for the movie is "The Final Countdown". No idea on the wargame.
The film where a modern nuclear US carrier travels accidentally in time and arrives just before the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett
-
- Posts: 1810
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:58 am
RE: Why no Chester?
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Nine of the ten Nimitz-class carriers are named in full e.g. Ronald Reagan and
Carl Vinson, while the tenth, is just Nimitz. Why is poor Chester not treated with this respect? Any ideas? I asked the knowledgable peeps on the WITP site but no joy. Not a major point but one that is annoying me.....[&:]ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish
Everyone who would care KNOWS who the The USS Nimitz is named after. I don't think Chester is rolling over in his grave on this issue.
I‘m assuming you are talking about the Heavy Cruiser USS Chester (CA-27, originally CL-27) named after the city of Chester, Pennsylvania.
[:D] Kind of hard for an entire city to roll over in its grave. [:D]
University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)
-
- Posts: 22136
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
- Contact:
RE: Why no Chester?
I've been to Chester many times. It wouldn't be all that difficult to roll the whole place over.[:D]ORIGINAL: Extraneous
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Nine of the ten Nimitz-class carriers are named in full e.g. Ronald Reagan and
Carl Vinson, while the tenth, is just Nimitz. Why is poor Chester not treated with this respect? Any ideas? I asked the knowledgable peeps on the WITP site but no joy. Not a major point but one that is annoying me.....[&:]ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish
Everyone who would care KNOWS who the The USS Nimitz is named after. I don't think Chester is rolling over in his grave on this issue.
I‘m assuming you are talking about the Heavy Cruiser USS Chester (CA-27, originally CL-27) named after the city of Chester, Pennsylvania.
[:D] Kind of hard for an entire city to roll over in its grave. [:D]
Steve
Perfection is an elusive goal.
Perfection is an elusive goal.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm
RE: Why no Chester?
yep, The Final Countdown is the movie of course. Thankfully, it came out well before that craptastic rock song with the same name, so when you watch the movie, you won't have to worry about hearing that.
In the movie there is a quick shot in a ward room of some of the crew setting up the boards to play Squad Leader.
I thought someone around here made up a WiF counter for the F-15 several years ago... ??? It would make a great Easter Egg in any WWII game...
In the movie there is a quick shot in a ward room of some of the crew setting up the boards to play Squad Leader.
I thought someone around here made up a WiF counter for the F-15 several years ago... ??? It would make a great Easter Egg in any WWII game...
RE: Why no Chester?
Other bad ideas for Ship names:
CA - USS Intercourse (for Intercourse, PA)
CA - USS Scaggsville (for Scaggsville, MD)
Does the UK name ships after people? Then we could have the USS Laurel (for Laurel, MD) & HMS Hardy (for Thomas Hardy) on a joint mission...
Ok, stopping now.
CA - USS Intercourse (for Intercourse, PA)
CA - USS Scaggsville (for Scaggsville, MD)
Does the UK name ships after people? Then we could have the USS Laurel (for Laurel, MD) & HMS Hardy (for Thomas Hardy) on a joint mission...
Ok, stopping now.
"Part of the $10 million I spent on gambling, part on booze and part on women. The rest I spent foolishly." - George Raft
- Vincenzo_Beretta
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 10:00 am
- Location: Milan, Italy
RE: Why no Chester?
There is a "The Final Countdown" scenario in the old "Complete Carriers at War", with the CVN Nimitz complete with Tomcats, Corsairs, Intruders and Hawkeyes. The commander, of course, is K. Douglas.
RE: Why no Chester?
I don't think my wife would like that comment about that rock group. She still is a real fan of those boys (I'm not...). The movie itself was really, really crap. I've seen some nonsense in regards to movies, but that one was really over the top...ORIGINAL: brian brian
yep, The Final Countdown is the movie of course. Thankfully, it came out well before that craptastic rock song with the same name, so when you watch the movie, you won't have to worry about hearing that.
In the movie there is a quick shot in a ward room of some of the crew setting up the boards to play Squad Leader.
I thought someone around here made up a WiF counter for the F-15 several years ago... ??? It would make a great Easter Egg in any WWII game...
Peter
-
- Posts: 1810
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:58 am
RE: Why no Chester? Why no Haunebu?
- Attachments
-
- HAUNEBU.jpg (67 KiB) Viewed 58 times
University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)