Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by SqzMyLemon »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Before anyone asks, yes, I do plan on invading Australia. The intent is to use 14 Army (48 & 16 Div, 65 Bde), 16 Army (2 & 38 Div) and SAA (4 & 21 Div). Eventually, 14 Army will defend Australia, 16 Army will defend Java and the SAA divisions will be the SRA reserve. The 25 Army (5 & 18 Div) will defend Palembang and Malaya.

The goal is to have all operations complete (with the exception of Australia most likely) by the end of Mar 42 (when the invasion bonus ends).

Hi Mike,

I may have missed this somewhere, but is this a full blown invasion of Australia with the aim to conquer it completely or a typical holding and delay type invasion?
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

Man IJ AARs are scareeeee

Just keep looking at your ship queue for 43. It should calm the nerves.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by obvert »

OZ!

This will be fun to watch.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
pws1225
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Tate's Hell, Florida

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by pws1225 »

Man, I gotta watch this one unfold. In my first game as Japan I am already bogged down in Java and Burma. I will be taking some serious notes! Go get'em Mike!
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2378
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by SuluSea »

Hi Mike, what's your resource transports in and around the home islands look like? Are you using Damian's chart , your own or a variation of the two?
 
Thanks and good luck![:)]
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
User avatar
perkinh
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:27 am
Location: Central, NC

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by perkinh »

Hi Mike,

Also wondering about Oz, and would like some input on it. I like the idea of taking Northern Australia, if for no other reason than to keep the airfields knocked down. I dont normally build them up, why provide ready made fields for the counter. What are your goals here.

Next question..what are your thoughts on Nells vs. Betties? I like the G3M3..it comes quick, has great range, and gets radar and has the added benefit of freeing up HA-32 engines for the army. I have been rethinking my position lately, do you feel it is better for late war upgrades to stick to all Betties, you dont lose production with upgrades then. What are you thoughts as well as the esteemed readers.
One of the serious problems in planning the fight against American doctrine.... is that the Americans do not read their manuals, nor do they feel any obligation to follow their doctrine
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon
ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Before anyone asks, yes, I do plan on invading Australia. The intent is to use 14 Army (48 & 16 Div, 65 Bde), 16 Army (2 & 38 Div) and SAA (4 & 21 Div). Eventually, 14 Army will defend Australia, 16 Army will defend Java and the SAA divisions will be the SRA reserve. The 25 Army (5 & 18 Div) will defend Palembang and Malaya.

The goal is to have all operations complete (with the exception of Australia most likely) by the end of Mar 42 (when the invasion bonus ends).

Hi Mike,

I may have missed this somewhere, but is this a full blown invasion of Australia with the aim to conquer it completely or a typical holding and delay type invasion?

Just the north to delay the inevitable. If I can keep it till fall of 42, I'll have considered it a success. My second goal is to not lose any major ground units there.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

Man IJ AARs are scareeeee
[:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: pws1225

Man, I gotta watch this one unfold. In my first game as Japan I am already bogged down in Java and Burma. I will be taking some serious notes! Go get'em Mike!

Burma, ah Burma. Just today Ted, my opponent, and I were exchanging emails and he described Burma as a slow motion slugfest. Boy ain't that the truth!

Someone (ny59giants, Chickenboy or Q-Ball I suspect), in my previous game suggested that I land a force on Java early, just to get a bridgehead. I did, at Kalidjati. I believe it was a division and some armor, but don't quote me on it. I ended up cutting the island in 2 and separating his forces. Interior lines and all that for me. [;)] When I landed the main force (a couple more divisions) I was able to defeat him in detail. North first then south. I plan on doing something similar this game, but I'll probably land somewhere else. Kaldjati is perfect, but I don't want to do the same thing twice. He may be waiting for it. I suspect he'll mine that base.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

Hi Mike, what's your resource transports in and around the home islands look like? Are you using Damian's chart , your own or a variation of the two?

Thanks and good luck![:)]

Sulu, I'll post that tomorrow when I have some time. To be honest, I haven't looked at Damians chart. I've been meaning to but I try to work on the turn when I have time. I can't seem to scrounge extra time to read his wonderful document.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Gabede

Hi Mike,

Also wondering about Oz, and would like some input on it. I like the idea of taking Northern Australia, if for no other reason than to keep the airfields knocked down. I dont normally build them up, why provide ready made fields for the counter. What are your goals here.

Next question..what are your thoughts on Nells vs. Betties? I like the G3M3..it comes quick, has great range, and gets radar and has the added benefit of freeing up HA-32 engines for the army. I have been rethinking my position lately, do you feel it is better for late war upgrades to stick to all Betties, you dont lose production with upgrades then. What are you thoughts as well as the esteemed readers.

You hit it on the head with Australia. It's a prevent defense. He'll get it back some day. Just delaying the inevitable. Every day he can't bomb the SRA is a victory for the Japanese.

To be honest, I haven't really spent a lot of time comparing the Nell and Betty. Right now I plan on producing both. Since they each have their own upgrade paths, converting factories cost time and supply. I'm all in favor of saving both when possible. I also look at engines differently than most. It is a commodity that is necessary to produce aircraft. I decide what aircraft and in what numbers I want to build and then adjust my engine factories to meet that requirement.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15874
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by Mike Solli »

Hi guys. Here's some of the things I ponder at lunch. Sorry for the length of my ramblings, but I have time to think about the game during the day and put my thoughts down at lunch. [;)]

Hi all. Since my illustrious opponent didn’t drop everything in his life to do his turn (I guess I should mention that I didn’t get it to him till about 9:30 pm), I had some time to review some aspects of my industry.

Current aircraft production:

Type – Built(repairing) – Pool-(Factory on-Factory off)
A6M2 – 72(28)-5-(80-100)
B5N1 – 8(8)-76-(On until engines depleted)
B5N2 – 9(7)-34-(50-80)
C5M2 – 6(0)-10-(10-20)
D3A1 – 20(10)-21-(50-100)
E13A1 – 27(0)-22-(50-100)
E14Y1 – 17(3)-9-(On until engines depleted)
G3M2 – 30(0)-54-(50-80)
G4M1 – 30(0)-6-(50-80)
H6K4 – 10(0)-9-(20-40)
L3Y2 – 8(2)-0-(10-20)
Ki-21-IIa – 31(9)-34-(50-80)
Ki-43-Ic – 57(71)-2-(80-100)
Ki-46-II – 19(1)-12-(20-40)
Ki-48 – 34(0)-41-(40-60)
Ki-57-I – 8(2)-18-(20-40)

Obsolete (No Production):
Type – Pool
A5M4 – 73 (Trainers)
B4Y1 – 34 (Trainers)
B5M1 – 13 (Trainers)
E7K2 – 43 (Frontline use until expended)
E8N2 – 60 (Frontline use until expended)
F1M2 – 22 (Frontline use – transitioning to trainers)
Ki-15-II – 6 (Frontline use/Trainers)
Ki-21-Ic – 46 (Trainers)
MC-21 – 3 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-27b – 3 (Frontline use/Trainers – transitioning to trainers)
Ki-30 – 36 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-32 – 1 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-36 – 40 (Trainers)
Ki-43-Ia – 8 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-43-Ib – 13 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-51 – 73 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-56 – 8 (Frontline use until expended)
Ki-59 – 9 (Trainers)

The “Factory on – Factory off” numbers are basically the spread where I’d like to keep the pool. At the top end, I’ll shut off the factory and turn it back on when the pool drops to the low end. Note that this will change over time. As I near an upgrade, I’ll reduce the pool size. The goal is to get the upgrade in production and use it to “replace” aircraft much as I’m replacing frontline Nates with the Oscar Ic now. Ideally, the old pool will be gone when the upgrade reaches production. As I get enough of the upgrade to upgrade a unit, the aircraft from the upgraded unit enter the pool to replace losses in those still using the now obsolescent aircraft.

Current Engine Production

Type – Building(repairing) – Pool

Hitachi Amakaze – 0(0) – 118 (These are Glen engines.)

Ha-31 – 45(0) – 251 (Ki-46-II – later for the Nick FB and the Ki-57-II. Modest increase probably needed later.)

Ha-32 – 77(23) – 35 (Betty & Sally – Need to increase by 40 to break even. Will need more for Jill, Emily, Jack & Francis.)

Ha-33 – 73(22) – 82 (Val, Jake, Nell & Mavis – Need to increase by 80. Will drop by 40 when Mavis transitions to Emily in 7/42. Needed for multiple airframes. Will increase later in war.)

Ha-34 – 10(0) – 7 (Nothing until Helen in 4/42. Will increase production to 160 in Jan 42. Needed for Tojo in 9/42 so production will increase further.)

Ha-35 – 206(124) – 159 (Zero, Kate, Babs, Oscar & Lily – This is the big one, as you all know. Production slightly exceeds demand. It’ll increase periodically throughout the war but is looking good right now.)

By increasing my engine factories, my HI use will increase, but it’s not as bad as I thought:

Ha-32: 40
Ha-33: 80
Ha-34: 160

When completed this will use (40+80+160)*18/30/2 = 84 HI factories of production. By capturing Malaya and Java, my factories will increase by 140. That’s before damage and also before I increase HI factories in those areas, which I am planning to do. It’ll work.

Vehicles are currently at 102. There are 6 factories and I am going to increase each of them by 8 to get a nice round 150 production.

Naval ship building increases will be complete at 1500 tomorrow. That’s where it will remain. This is new for me. I never increased it before. It should prove useful and fun.

Armaments are unchanged at 620. I don’t see a need to increase them at this point.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
CT Grognard
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by CT Grognard »

Well, if you are not going to go for Kalidjati again may I suggest Semarang? Starts the war with a Level 5 port, in a clear (cultivated) hex, with no garrison (i.e. no Coastal Defence guns). Plus there is a good rail link between Semarang and Djokjakarta (right next to each other), so you can rapidly cut off north Java (i.e. Batavia) and south Java (i.e. Soerabaja).

The closest forces to Semarang start the war in Tjilatjap (3 hexes of rail away), about 70 AV.
CT Grognard
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by CT Grognard »

Here's a list of viable B-29 bases in north Australia (in order of suitability (i.e. potential size) and how long it will take to build them up!):

Darwin: 3/7
Broome: 3/6
Katherine: 1/7
Fenton: 0/7
Derby: 1/6
Daly Waters: 1/6
Nookanbah: 1/6
Port Hedland: 0/6
Corunna Downs: 0/6
Exmouth: 0/5
Bathurst Island: 0/5
Gove: 0/5
Wessel Marchinbar Island: 0/4

That being said, from a supply perspective, as long as you can take and hold at the very least the Darwin-Fenton-Katherine-Daly Waters railway, and in addition the Broome-Derby-Nookanbah road, you should be able to deny your enemy the ability to perform any strategic bombing in the SRA.

Port Hedland could be developed into a B29 base, but despite the 100 resources at Corunna Downs is notoriously difficult to keep supplied.
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by jrcar »

Ref Vehicles and Armaments.
You need more of the former, no more of the later. We ended up by about Aug 1942 with:

259 vehicle points
95 Armaments producing (500 turned off)

Both are about right, although we can now aford to turn off some of our vehicles as we fnally have a decent surplus, it took a long time though.

We converted armaments factories to vehicles, and have 8 armaments factories (about 500 points worth)turned off.

In March 1943 we have 9000 vehicle points spare and about 144,000 armament points spare.

Cheers

Rob
AE BETA Breaker
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2378
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by SuluSea »

Mike, are you dumping any R&D into the A6M2-N? It comes online in 4/42 and by that date the 30 R&D will be repaired and since the next airframe in it's upgrade path is  the A6M5 you can change it to the next available upgrade and have undamaged factories researching an airframe that comes online in 8/43 in spring of 42. Pretty good deal IMO. [:)]
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9881
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by ny59giants »

Kalidjati

Yes, this is the best invasion spot in Java to isolate the forces near Batavia from Soerabaja, IMO. Add in you get that size 4 AF to use right away. Hopefully, he doesn't more massive amounts of troops into the mtn base nearby. I did that as an Allied player and tied up a large number of Japanese troops for some time. [:D]
[center]Image[/center]
CT Grognard
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by CT Grognard »

Speaking of which, it would have been fantastic if the Japanese player had the ability to apply a "scorched earth" policy, for example occupy northern Australia, and blast all of the facilities into dust, and withdraw... [:D]
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: jrcar

Ref Vehicles and Armaments.
You need more of the former, no more of the later. We ended up by about Aug 1942 with:

259 vehicle points
95 Armaments producing (500 turned off)

Both are about right, although we can now aford to turn off some of our vehicles as we fnally have a decent surplus, it took a long time though.

We converted armaments factories to vehicles, and have 8 armaments factories (about 500 points worth)turned off.

In March 1943 we have 9000 vehicle points spare and about 144,000 armament points spare.

Cheers

Rob
+1

And depending upon you battle outcomes, you might even need more. But, I target VEH=250 as a minimum. It is one of the things that eats up my economic expansion in the early game. I figure I can only expand 15 factories at a time and still have some supply gain. With 6 VEH expanding for almost the first month, that leaves only 9 engine/ac factories to expand. Decisions. Decisions. as to which ones expand.
Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once More into the Breach

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

Mike, are you dumping any R&D into the A6M2-N? It comes online in 4/42 and by that date the 30 R&D will be repaired and since the next airframe in it's upgrade path is  the A6M5 you can change it to the next available upgrade and have undamaged factories researching an airframe that comes online in 8/43 in spring of 42. Pretty good deal IMO. [:)]
This is the only fast track R&D that I don't do. In fact, in my personal mod I mitigated this so that it doesn't gain you anything. It just feels 'gamey' to me. I do go for the A6M3 though. Only 2 months later ...

This is just me though ... if I was in a PBEM, maybe I would pursue it. Not sure. As I play against the AI, I don't.
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”