British Carriers in 1946

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

British Carriers in 1946

Post by Don Bowen »


What if Japan had not surrendered in 1945 and the war had dragged on through the end of 1946. What carriers would the Royal Navy commission in 1946?

Some very interesting ones under construction as of August, 1945...
xj900uk
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by xj900uk »

Agreed, they had some very good 'U'-class CVL's several of which served in Korea then went on to have distinguished careers in other navies when, not for the first time, the Royal Navy was forced to abandon a class of ship it had been instrumental in developing [:(]
I may be wrong, but I do believe a few (including the last Hermes, which was laid down as long ago as 1943 and saw service in teh Falklands war) is still around, albeit under another name.
User avatar
Dixie
Posts: 10303
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: UK

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Dixie »

Probably HMS Audacious and Ark Royal.  Maybe HMS Eagle (and possibly even Africa).

HMS Hercules, Leviathan, Terrible.  Maybe Magnificent, Majestic and Powerful.

HMS Triumph and HMS Warrior.

[center]Image

Bigger boys stole my sig
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Dixie

Probably HMS Audacious and Ark Royal.  Maybe HMS Eagle (and possibly even Africa).

HMS Hercules, Leviathan, Terrible.  Maybe Magnificent, Majestic and Powerful.

HMS Triumph and HMS Warrior.



Africa is interesting... Any air group guesses??
User avatar
Dixie
Posts: 10303
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: UK

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Dixie »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: Dixie

Probably HMS Audacious and Ark Royal.  Maybe HMS Eagle (and possibly even Africa).

HMS Hercules, Leviathan, Terrible.  Maybe Magnificent, Majestic and Powerful.

HMS Triumph and HMS Warrior.



Africa is interesting... Any air group guesses??

I meant the original 4th Audacious class that was cancellled rather than later Malta class, She may have ended up with a different name if she'd gone ahead.

A what-if discussion on the Audacious carriers gave a rough estimate of 84 aircraft:
3x 18 a/c Hellcat/Corsair groups (or 3x24 Seafires)
1x 12a/c Firefly sqn
1x 18a/c Avenger sqn

-OR-
2x21 a/c Hellcat/Corsair groups (or 3x18 Seafires)
2x12 a/c Firefly Sqn
1x18 a/c Avenger

The Seafires are unlikely though.
[center]Image

Bigger boys stole my sig
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Navalised Gloucester Meteors .. or even better De Havelin Vampires [8D]..

Pure speculation and wishful thinking on my part.. pretty please.


<---------- ships mascot [;)]
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

Navalised Gloucester Meteors .. or even better De Havelin Vampires [8D]..

Pure speculation and wishful thinking on my part.. pretty please.


<---------- ships mascot [;)]


No.
Don´t.

It´s enough that Rob beats me using Wildcats... [:-] [:D]
Image
Andy Mac
Posts: 12573
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Andy Mac »

I put all the late war RN ships into Ironman Allied to give the AI a chance cannot remember if I made up the air wings or researched them - as it was AI only they may be made up but they are all in there plus all the DD's on the stocks
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

I put all the late war RN ships into Ironman Allied to give the AI a chance cannot remember if I made up the air wings or researched them - as it was AI only they may be made up but they are all in there plus all the DD's on the stocks

Thanks, I should have thought of checking there!
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Iridium »

What about British what-if CVs like the Malta class etc? What's the chance of them actually building them if the war went on past '45 and when would these be completed if so?
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5177
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Iridium

What about British what-if CVs like the Malta class etc? What's the chance of them actually building them if the war went on past '45 and when would these be completed if so?

Beyond the scope of what I am looking at. Just what probably would have come online in '46.

Not so sure about the Audacious class. Lenton indicates that little progress was made on them during the war. Not at all convinced they could have been made available within a year. Anyone have more data?
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by herwin »

Per Brown: The Ark Royal II was designed based on wartime experience, especially the vulnerability of RN fleet carriers to flooding. The beam was increased to give protection against a 1000 lb contact charge. Subdivision was tight. Hangars were built to American standard. Aircraft stowage was four abreast. The hangars could handle 18 VF and 42 TBR. The deck park could handle 20 more.

The Malta was a much lengthened Ark Royal II, comparable with the Midway. Airgroup of 108, half fighters and half TBR.

Building time for the Colossus class was 21 months. 40 aircraft operated. Could not handle heavy aircraft--limited to 24000 lbs.

The Hermes class was built for modern heavy aircraft (30000 lbs).
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
bklooste
Posts: 1104
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:47 am

RE: British Carriers in 1946

Post by bklooste »

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

Navalised Gloucester Meteors .. or even better De Havelin Vampires [8D]..

Pure speculation and wishful thinking on my part.. pretty please.


<---------- ships mascot [;)]


Image

Here is a 1945 picture of one on HMS Ocean...
Underdog Fanboy
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”