Arty can't bombard?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

Arty can't bombard?

Post by pad152 »

How come bombardment is grayed out for this unit? Yet it can do a shock attack?
It's in a hex with an enemy unit, in combat mode, and supply.

Image
Attachments
AE11.jpg
AE11.jpg (59.27 KiB) Viewed 69 times
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Terminus »

And the 75mm GMC halftrack is not an indirect-fire artillery piece, and therefore can't bombard.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Gilbert
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Hendaye, France

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Gilbert »

Maybe because support is under the minimum requirement ?

Gilbert
UMI YUKABA
"If I go away to sea, I shall return a corpse awash, if duty calls me to the mountain, a verdant will be my pall, thus for the sake of the Emperor, I will not die peacefully at home...."
Dili
Posts: 4713
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Dili »

The confusion with unit classification rears its ugly head. I guess those were the 75mm employed for AT work.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Gilbert

Maybe because support is under the minimum requirement ?

Gilbert

The reason is the one I give above.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by pad152 »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

And the 75mm GMC halftrack is not an indirect-fire artillery piece, and therefore can't bombard.

Maybe the unit is miss named, and should be the "2nd Provisional SPM Brigade"?
The device 75mm GMC halftrack maybe should be classified as a tank destroyer?

2nd Provisional SPM Brigade

The GMC M3 was the most widely-deployed tank destroyer

"Confronted with an impending war with Japan, 75 GMC M3's and T12's, termed "Self-Propelled Mount" (SPM) halftracks, were shipped to the Philippine Islands in September 1941 to form the (2nd) Provisional SPM Brigade. These vehicles saw action during the Japanese invasion of the Philippines, and some were later captured by the Japanese and used against U.S. forces in 1944.[5]"

source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_GMC
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Cap Mandrake »

It is really more a direct fire, low-velocity, infantry support gun....but it would likely squash a Jap tankette like a bug with one direct hit.

Another example of why this is a serious grognard game. From the name of the unit and the icon it would be tough to tell.
Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Terminus »

This is an AFV, not an artillery piece. The end.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Gilbert
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Hendaye, France

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Gilbert »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: Gilbert

Maybe because support is under the minimum requirement ?

Gilbert

The reason is the one I give above.

Thanks Terminus, I was replying at the same time you did[:)]. However, I don't see any indication on the unit screen saying it's a DF unit and not an IND one but I guess type is given in unit database.

Regards

Gilbert
UMI YUKABA
"If I go away to sea, I shall return a corpse awash, if duty calls me to the mountain, a verdant will be my pall, thus for the sake of the Emperor, I will not die peacefully at home...."
User avatar
Justascratch
Posts: 233
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:56 am

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Justascratch »

Not to put too fine a point on it, but is Terminus trying to say that the 75mm GMC halftrack is not an indirect-fire artillery piece, but is instead an AFV and therefore can't participate in bombardment? Just checking cuz he wasn't very clear on this point. (hee hee)
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Well....it sure aint infantry...and it would be a stretch to call it amored...maybe it should be an AT unit.
Image
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by pad152 »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

This is an AFV, not an artillery piece. The end.

Then maybe it shouldn't be in an Arty unit! or the Arty unit is miss named! Take your pick!
Dili
Posts: 4713
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Dili »

This is an AFV, not an artillery piece. The end.

Hehe so what are:

T 19 105mm HMC SP
M 7 Priest SP
T 30 75mm HMC SP
M 8 HMC SP

[:D]

T12 is the artillery version, but apparently there wasn't any relevant difference between it and M3. Both had a copy of famous French 1897 gun and range was 8km when in artillery mode.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Mynok »


Field artillery units were not composed strictly of indirect-fire, towed artillery.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Well....it sure aint infantry...and it would be a stretch to call it amored...maybe it should be an AT unit.

And there's no such thing in AE. It's either Armored or Artillery.

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Kwik E Mart
Posts: 2447
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:42 pm

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Kwik E Mart »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

This is an AFV, not an artillery piece. The end.

in that case, i would change the unit icon nato symbology thingy from an artillery unit to an armored unit....
Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

Image
Houtje
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:53 am
Location: Netherlands

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Houtje »

unit designations aside, doesn't the fact that the unit has 'Guns:0' imply that it cannot bombard?
User avatar
Blackhorse
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Eastern US

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Blackhorse »

ORIGINAL: pad152

ORIGINAL: Terminus

And the 75mm GMC halftrack is not an indirect-fire artillery piece, and therefore can't bombard.

Maybe the unit is miss named, and should be the "2nd Provisional SPM Brigade"?
The device 75mm GMC halftrack maybe should be classified as a tank destroyer?

2nd Provisional SPM Brigade

The GMC M3 was the most widely-deployed tank destroyer

"Confronted with an impending war with Japan, 75 GMC M3's and T12's, termed "Self-Propelled Mount" (SPM) halftracks, were shipped to the Philippine Islands in September 1941 to form the (2nd) Provisional SPM Brigade. These vehicles saw action during the Japanese invasion of the Philippines, and some were later captured by the Japanese and used against U.S. forces in 1944.[5]"

source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_GMC


Noted for clarifying name change in patch. Thanks Pad. (Name change will probably be made in Patch #2)
WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Well....it sure aint infantry...and it would be a stretch to call it amored...maybe it should be an AT unit.

And there's no such thing in AE. It's either Armored or Artillery.

Pretend I didn't read the manual. [;)]

Then considering it is half-tracked, has some armor and has AP rounds, it should probably be classified as armor. I am not sure it is any less like armor than the Jap tankettes.

Are there any armored car units...surely they are armor.
Image
User avatar
Fred98
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Wollondilly, Sydney

RE: Arty can't bombard?

Post by Fred98 »

The name of the unit is "artillery"

The photo shows an artillery unit.

The icon is artillery.

Ergo: it is an artillery unit.

If it not an artillery unit then the game is flawed.

How many other units have this flaw?

-






Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”