War in China

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Post Reply
User avatar
composer99
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by composer99 »

Once winter arrives (and with it good weather in the North Monsoon zone), the thinness of the Chinese line in the south (1 unit each hex) should allow the Japanese to seize the second resource and perhaps even Nanning with relative ease.

Sian will obviously be a tougher nut to crack; however with 5 hexes on it the IJA should make an effort sooner or later or they will run out of time. It's a lot easier starting the defence against Chinese build-up/counter-offensives from the city then being all stretched out like that.
~ Composer99
User avatar
praem
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:38 am

RE: War in China

Post by praem »

the second resource has allready been abandoned - it is just a qudtion of walking in - no need to wait for fine weather
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: praem

the second resource has allready been abandoned - it is just a qudtion of walking in - no need to wait for fine weather
Yes, but to transport it to home, Japanese troops will have to clear the railway of Chinese ZoC. So there need to be some fighting for that reason, at least for the 2 hexes NE and N of the resource hex.
User avatar
Jagdtiger14
Posts: 1685
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: Miami Beach

RE: War in China

Post by Jagdtiger14 »

Just curious...where are the Chinese div's?  Would be really nice to put a Commy INF div in Si-An(pref the 2pt).  Both Chinese CAV div's could do some open field running in a couple places.  They are cheap and very useful, and cause the Japs to have to roll a net 20(2S result) instead of a net 19 to take a city with three units in it...and you get to shatter the best corp if there is a retreat route(as there is currently).
C
Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: War in China

Post by lomyrin »

The turn ended after Japan's moves for a short Septembe/October 40.

Japan did attack Si-An with a +7 on the 2D10 tables and rolled a 6 for a 13 net. All Japanese troops were disrupted but no losses to either side.
A few mionor moves were made in the south but no attacks in the rain.

Turn 8 - November/December 40 began with a Japanese impulse but snow in the north and fine in the south. Japan with a combined sent in 2 more infantry corps sailed directly into Canton. A groundstrike on Si-An disrupted one unit there but Japan awaits better weather than snow for an attack.

Reinforcements were placed by the Chinese prior to the Japanese moves and USA froze Japanese assets causing the withdrawal of 1 oil that no longer is sent to Japan and the buildpoint is no longer sentto the USA.


Image
Attachments
ChiT8imp1.jpg
ChiT8imp1.jpg (434.4 KiB) Viewed 132 times
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: lomyrin
Reinforcements were placed by the Chinese prior to the Japanese moves and USA froze Japanese assets causing the withdrawal of 1 oil that no longer is sent to Japan and the buildpoint is no longer sentto the USA.
The USA need to ship 2 oils. When they reduce the shiiping of resources, these are normal resources that are no more sent, not oil.
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: War in China

Post by lomyrin »

ORIGINAL: Froonp
ORIGINAL: lomyrin
Reinforcements were placed by the Chinese prior to the Japanese moves and USA froze Japanese assets causing the withdrawal of 1 oil that no longer is sent to Japan and the buildpoint is no longer sentto the USA.
The USA need to ship 2 oils. When they reduce the shiiping of resources, these are normal resources that are no more sent, not oil.

Of course, I stated it wrong, it one less resource shipped. 1 now arrives instead of 2.
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: War in China

Post by lomyrin »

November/december 40 is going quickly, already impulse 3 for the first Chinese moves.

The communists are slowly getting into better positions with more troops. Soon they will have enough units to afford breaking one unit down into Divisons.

In the south the AA gun is moved to stack with the Mil in the forest hex near theresource to stiffen the hex defense a little.

The Chinese are also awaiting spring of 41, they believe Japan will have to reassign many units for a wider Pacific War by late spring or so.

Image
Attachments
ChiT8imp3.jpg
ChiT8imp3.jpg (460.85 KiB) Viewed 132 times
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: War in China

Post by lomyrin »

Japans inpulse 5 in November/December 40. The time pressure on Japan is building and Japan decides to make a risky attack on Si-An again, this time it works but it costs Japan 1 Div and 1 Mil unit and most of them are disrupted so this is it for this front this turn.

In the south an attack in fine weather is made on a Chinese unit having a ZOC on the rail link Japan needs to have clear in order to ship the southern resource to Japan. An attack is made with HQ Yamamoto support but the net result is a 13 which only disrupts all the Japanese units with no Chinese losses and that is pretty much the end of Japans attacks in this area too for this turn.

Image
Attachments
ChiT8imp5.jpg
ChiT8imp5.jpg (462.12 KiB) Viewed 133 times
User avatar
praem
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:38 am

RE: War in China

Post by praem »

Isnt ZOC negated by the pressence of friendly units? Then we've played it wrong
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8362
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: War in China

Post by paulderynck »

ORIGINAL: praem

Isnt ZOC negated by the pressence of friendly units? Then we've played it wrong
For supply - yes. For tracing resources - no, although you can trace a resource out of a hex occupied by a friendly unit in an enemy ZOC, you can't trace further on along rail lines that are in enemy ZOC. For land movement - never.
Paul
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 2810
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: War in China

Post by Joseignacio »

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: praem

Isnt ZOC negated by the pressence of friendly units? Then we've played it wrong
For supply - yes. For tracing resources - no, although you can trace a resource out of a hex occupied by a friendly unit in an enemy ZOC, you can't trace further on along rail lines that are in enemy ZOC. For land movement - never.

For rail movement... Wasn't there a rule that it could be possible to start or reach (but never cross) in an enemy ZOC but not both?
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22136
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: praem

Isnt ZOC negated by the pressence of friendly units? Then we've played it wrong
For supply - yes. For tracing resources - no, although you can trace a resource out of a hex occupied by a friendly unit in an enemy ZOC, you can't trace further on along rail lines that are in enemy ZOC. For land movement - never.

For rail movement... Wasn't there a rule that it could be possible to start or reach (but never cross) in an enemy ZOC but not both?
Yes. Provided there is a friendly unit in the hex, rail movement can leave (and enter) enemy ZOCs, but once entering an enemy ZOC, they must stop.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 2810
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: War in China

Post by Joseignacio »

Thx Steve.
User avatar
Caquineur
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:32 am
Location: Aix en Provence, France, Europe

RE: War in China

Post by Caquineur »

ORIGINAL: composer99
Noticed a typo in the Chungking warlord description. It reads "after the dead of Liu" in the second paragraph (if I recall correctly). The correct form is, I trust, obvious. [:)]

Thanks for that - I missed this one...

And thanks to lomyrin for this thread ! Very nice.
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: War in China

Post by lomyrin »

Snowy weather continues and the Cinese reinforced the weaker units in the south in the critical hexes for the resource to deny it to the Japanese.

Japan impulse 9 shows no better weather than in the past in this turn and Japan's units in positions for attacks both in the north and the south are all disrupted and cannot do anything this turn. Japan began moving a Marine from the front towards Changsha for railing to the coast later.

Image
Attachments
ChiT8imp9.jpg
ChiT8imp9.jpg (460.81 KiB) Viewed 130 times
User avatar
sajbalk
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:39 am
Location: Davenport, Iowa

RE: War in China

Post by sajbalk »

I realize the USSR is neutral, removing a large constraint from Japan. The weather has been moderate and the Japanese luck for combat perhaps a bit bad.

However, it seems like China is doing quite well and will hurt Japan later in the war.

From this example, Japan is in real trouble. Perhaps strat bombing is needed.

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA
User avatar
micheljq
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Quebec
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by micheljq »

I don't see the so called large USSR constraint on Japan. USSR almost never can afford a large commitment in Asia, because as soon as USSR will do this, Germany will come at his throat and kill USSR, at least in 1940-42.
Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
User avatar
composer99
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by composer99 »

Not if Germany is building for a Sealion, it won't.
~ Composer99
User avatar
micheljq
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Quebec
Contact:

RE: War in China

Post by micheljq »

ORIGINAL: composer99

Not if Germany is building for a Sealion, it won't.

If I play Germany and prepares a Sealion, I will cancel it and attack USSR if it weakens his western front you can bet.
Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”