ORIGINAL: JWEThe joke about the really good ones is they should be kept behind glass with a sign ‘break only in time of conflict’. A cliché, I know, but clichés have some truth.
I disagree completely, bad officers are a danger to their men and should be weeded out with extreme prejudice whenever they are found.
As an example, I'll give a little inside info into the recent Oakland Police department tragedy (I'm retired OPD) which saw 4 offices killed and a 5th wounded. Police departments are Para military organizations and the same standards of leadership apply to them in 99% of cases.
What happened was a car stop that went bad. The first two officers were both shot in the head by the suspect, who leaned out of his car window and fired backwards with his pistol. This fact alone should have given any commander pause that they had an extremely accurate marksman on their hands and should proceed with caution.
Instead the career minded building rat (our term for "staff" officers interested only in their personal advancement) in charge of the SWAT team ordered a rush into the building where the suspect was holed up without waiting for proper equipment to arrive. Up until this point I'm sure this building rat was a great asset to the department as a paper pusher, but the fact he was placed in a position of command (deputy chief) was about to cost lives.
Immediately another officer was shot in the head and the SWAT team pulled out of the building to evacuate the casualty. The idiot again ordered a rush and a fourth officer was shot in the head and the fifth grazed in the head before the others finally took out the suspect.
The building rat in charge didn't wait for a negotiator, flash bang grenades, smoke, tear gas, or the armored personnel carrier to arrive, he wanted the credit for the takedown and ordered 2 more men to their deaths all to help advance his career.
Later that night he cried on the evening news... crocodile tears of course.
Jim