Problem With Move

[New York Jets]

I have a Union Army in Cincinnati with Amphibious initiative. I also have transport capacity of 250/20 on The Ohio River. There is a rail line between Cincinnati and Lexington, KY. Yet McClernand, a 5/5 leader with 3 Infantry and 2 Militia (I guess that's a 0/5 counting the units), transport usage of 20 amphib, is not being allowed to move across the river. There is a cavalry unit in Cincinnati, as well. It IS allowed to move to Lexington.

What am I missing?

[Joel Billings]

If you don't have amphibious initiative, you can't do an amphibious landing. Moving across the river might cost more MPs than you have (is it winter)?

[New York Jets]

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

If you don't have amphibious initiative, you can't do an amphibious landing. Moving across the river might cost more MPs than you have (is it winter)?

After reading your post, a quick perusal of the movement chart shows my problem. Thank you, Joel for the insight. Winter is a factor. But the other factors involved (yes, it is winter) pile up to prohibit the move.

I need to study the movement chart more closely.

[Treefrog]

Seems to me a patch on Kentucky also prohibits amphibious invasions on the turn of DOW.

[New York Jets]

ORIGINAL: Treefrog

Seems to me a patch on Kentucky also prohibits amphibious invasions on the turn of DOW.

Did not need amphib, anyway. I had two other stacks move into Paducah and Louisville as it was.