Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
I need some advice from someone with experience...
It's late July 1943 and I will soon start producing A6M5s for my carrier groups. My question is how good the Jack is vs the A6M3/5 models. There are plenty of non-carrier squadrons out there to upgrade. So far I have not produced many Jacks and I have about 150 in service and 120 in the AC pool.
So all out A6M5 or increase my production of 50 Jacks/month so it's more balanced?
Oh and is the A6M5c anything to have?
It's late July 1943 and I will soon start producing A6M5s for my carrier groups. My question is how good the Jack is vs the A6M3/5 models. There are plenty of non-carrier squadrons out there to upgrade. So far I have not produced many Jacks and I have about 150 in service and 120 in the AC pool.
So all out A6M5 or increase my production of 50 Jacks/month so it's more balanced?
Oh and is the A6M5c anything to have?
- dpstafford
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:50 am
- Location: Colbert Nation
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Oh, thank god! The Chevy Chase avatar is gone!!
And BRMC is so last month. Check out SSPU (Silversun Pickups)!
And BRMC is so last month. Check out SSPU (Silversun Pickups)!
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
He is not gone. Check my profile [:D]
They sound interesting. Gonna check them out further by buying their EP on Itunes.
Check out Logh, Death to my hometown
They sound interesting. Gonna check them out further by buying their EP on Itunes.
Check out Logh, Death to my hometown
- dpstafford
- Posts: 1329
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:50 am
- Location: Colbert Nation
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Hmmm. Amazon has that CD as import only. And no sample tracks.ORIGINAL: U2
Check out Logh, Death to my hometown
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Jack is Corsair compared to A6M5! Sure, it can not stop Thunderbolts but it is fine ac, much better than Zero family..
As for Zeke FB, keep them... i think they are good against unescorted heavy bombers.
- jwilkerson
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
U2 perhaps post this on the open forum not everyone looks in here.
I'm playing my first PDU On game (all others were PDU off) and PDU on is different universe as regards this question. In my current game I plan to convert about half of my land based navy fighters units to JACK .. but I'm doing this on "spec" .. just looking at the stats .. not based on EXP. But I think some guys like Irrelevant might be able to help based on EXP. They just might not look here asap.
I'm playing my first PDU On game (all others were PDU off) and PDU on is different universe as regards this question. In my current game I plan to convert about half of my land based navy fighters units to JACK .. but I'm doing this on "spec" .. just looking at the stats .. not based on EXP. But I think some guys like Irrelevant might be able to help based on EXP. They just might not look here asap.
AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead
New Game Project Lead
- Bobthehatchit
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 7:15 pm
- Location: GREAT BRITAIN
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
ORIGINAL: jwilkerson
U2 perhaps post this on the open forum not everyone looks in here.
I'm playing my first PDU On game (all others were PDU off) and PDU on is different universe as regards this question. In my current game I plan to convert about half of my land based navy fighters units to JACK .. but I'm doing this on "spec" .. just looking at the stats .. not based on EXP. But I think some guys like Irrelevant might be able to help based on EXP. They just might not look here asap.
Jacks are great bomber killers although they do "struggle" with the later gen allied fighters, Range is alot less that than the Zero Family. This makes them an excellent point defence fighter bit like the later mark spitfires.
Plus they look fantastic!
"Look at yours before laughing at mine". Garfield 1984.
Wanted: ISDII Low millage in Imperial gray.
Just my 2 pence worth.
I might not be right.
Hell I am probaby wrong.
But thats my opinion for what its worth!
Wanted: ISDII Low millage in Imperial gray.
Just my 2 pence worth.
I might not be right.
Hell I am probaby wrong.
But thats my opinion for what its worth!
- niceguy2005
- Posts: 12522
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Super secret hidden base
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
My P-38s just had their first two encouters with Jacks, much different than the zero. I would rate well piloted Jacks to roughly equal well piloted P-38s.
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Excellent, thanks guys!
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Wish I could, but I'm embarassed to say I never have got that far. We keep starting over in PBEM, and I have no patience for the AI![:o][;)]ORIGINAL: jwilkerson
But I think some guys like Irrelevant might be able to help based on EXP.
Fear the kitten!
- Mike Solli
- Posts: 15874
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
I get the Jack in about 3 game weeks. I'll let you guys know.
Created by the amazing Dixie
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
12/43 - CHS 1.x - I'm the allies.
I hate those d@amn Jacks. Even F4U-1s (which are toned down a bit in CHS) have trouble with them under the wrong (or right) circumstances. While they're no match for Thuds, I'm keeping my P-38s (even the J model) away from them when I can. They've impressed me far more than either the A6M5 or even the George.
In mid-late '43 it's by far the best air superiority fighter that the Japanese have IMO.
I hate those d@amn Jacks. Even F4U-1s (which are toned down a bit in CHS) have trouble with them under the wrong (or right) circumstances. While they're no match for Thuds, I'm keeping my P-38s (even the J model) away from them when I can. They've impressed me far more than either the A6M5 or even the George.
In mid-late '43 it's by far the best air superiority fighter that the Japanese have IMO.
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Almost agree with Ctangus, except with comparision Jack/George. George has better survival chance than Jack - think that have something with manevour ratings...
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
ORIGINAL: ctangus
They've impressed me far more than either the A6M5 or even the George.
In mid-late '43 it's by far the best air superiority fighter that the Japanese have IMO.
ORIGINAL: pauk
Almost agree with Ctangus, except with comparision Jack/George. George has better survival chance than Jack - think that have something with manevour ratings...
This is because in our game I have two models of Georges.
N1K1 is worse than J2M, but Chuck, wait a bit till I get N1K2...
[:D]
Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł
- MineSweeper
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:03 pm
- Location: Nags Head, NC
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
This is because in our game I have two models of Georges.
N1K1 is worse than J2M, but Chuck, wait a bit till I get N1K2...
Wait until you get the Frank's - they are even more awesome (7 range to boot)[:)]
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
ORIGINAL: viberpol
This is because in our game I have two models of Georges.
N1K1 is worse than J2M, but Chuck, wait a bit till I get N1K2...
[:D]
Two weeks until the F4U-1D... [:'(]
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
I am using both (plus Georges) in August 44 and I am sorry to report that due to the inexperience of the pilots they are still getting shot down at a 3:1-4:1 rate vs high exp P-38s.
I just had a ton slaughtered against Russian fighters:
Day Air attack on Uglahamensk , at 66,33
Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 31
J2M Jack x 40
P1Y Frances x 53
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 102
Ki-21 Sally x 35
Ki-49 Helen x 128
Allied aircraft
La-5FN x 127
Yak-3 x 28
Yak-9D x 107
P-63A x 141
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 31 destroyed
J2M Jack: 40 destroyed
P1Y Frances: 27 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 97 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 26 destroyed
Ki-49 Helen: 71 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
La-5FN: 27 destroyed, 45 damaged
Yak-3: 6 destroyed, 1 damaged
Yak-9D: 14 destroyed, 14 damaged
P-63A: 41 destroyed, 35 damaged
and
Day Air attack on Uglahamensk , at 66,33
Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 115
J2M Jack x 37
A6M5c Zeke x 25
A6M3a Zero x 23
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 51
Ki-21 Sally x 77
Ki-49 Helen x 41
Allied aircraft
La-5FN x 48
Yak-3 x 10
Yak-9D x 44
P-63A x 49
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 74 destroyed
J2M Jack: 12 destroyed, 9 damaged
A6M5c Zeke: 13 destroyed
A6M3a Zero: 16 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 48 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 15 destroyed, 46 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 9 destroyed, 19 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
La-5FN: 60 destroyed
Yak-3: 8 destroyed
Yak-9D: 38 destroyed
P-63A: 50 destroyed
Pe-2R: 1 destroyed
Allied ground losses:
56 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 33
I just had a ton slaughtered against Russian fighters:
Day Air attack on Uglahamensk , at 66,33
Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 31
J2M Jack x 40
P1Y Frances x 53
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 102
Ki-21 Sally x 35
Ki-49 Helen x 128
Allied aircraft
La-5FN x 127
Yak-3 x 28
Yak-9D x 107
P-63A x 141
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 31 destroyed
J2M Jack: 40 destroyed
P1Y Frances: 27 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 97 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 26 destroyed
Ki-49 Helen: 71 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
La-5FN: 27 destroyed, 45 damaged
Yak-3: 6 destroyed, 1 damaged
Yak-9D: 14 destroyed, 14 damaged
P-63A: 41 destroyed, 35 damaged
and
Day Air attack on Uglahamensk , at 66,33
Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 115
J2M Jack x 37
A6M5c Zeke x 25
A6M3a Zero x 23
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 51
Ki-21 Sally x 77
Ki-49 Helen x 41
Allied aircraft
La-5FN x 48
Yak-3 x 10
Yak-9D x 44
P-63A x 49
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 74 destroyed
J2M Jack: 12 destroyed, 9 damaged
A6M5c Zeke: 13 destroyed
A6M3a Zero: 16 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 48 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 15 destroyed, 46 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 9 destroyed, 19 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
La-5FN: 60 destroyed
Yak-3: 8 destroyed
Yak-9D: 38 destroyed
P-63A: 50 destroyed
Pe-2R: 1 destroyed
Allied ground losses:
56 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 33
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003
"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
- MineSweeper
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:03 pm
- Location: Nags Head, NC
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Wow.....have the Russians been training for 4 years....[:D]
But Experince is everything with regard to even capable fighters @ ATA
But Experince is everything with regard to even capable fighters @ ATA
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
I prefer the Jack A LOT! They are good, solid fighters and do well against everything but the last of the Allied fighters.
The A5 goes on CVs because I cannot cheat and put anything else there! [:D]
The George seems to be a pretty good fighter. I am building more of them in my June 1944 campaign with Wolfpack.
The A5 goes on CVs because I cannot cheat and put anything else there! [:D]
The George seems to be a pretty good fighter. I am building more of them in my June 1944 campaign with Wolfpack.
Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
RE: Jack vs A6M3/A6M5
Christ 1000 a/c lost in one day....stock a2a I presume[;)]