Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

DeZanic
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:41 pm

Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by DeZanic »

Hello

I have had a serious disastrous war for the last 9 months in this game. It is august 1942 and I lost a serious amount of carriers because of a failed attempt to attack Rabaul.

Now I am kinda locked and can't do anything I guess. Is this the point where I should surrender and start over?

By the way.. I do not reload savegames. What has happened has happened and cannot be undone. So that is not an option. I would like what I do in this case. Hints? Because I feel kinda depressed now.

Thanks for some answers and hints.

Image
Attachments
CVsunk.jpg
CVsunk.jpg (226.37 KiB) Viewed 410 times
User avatar
VukyTzar
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:07 pm
Location: Croatia

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by VukyTzar »

As JFB i'm having evil laugh right now[:)][:D][:D]. I'll watch this one closely and I am sorry I cant help you. Good luck! [8D]
User avatar
John B.
Posts: 3985
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by John B. »

How many carriers do you still have and has the IJN lost any?
John Barr
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 19688
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by BBfanboy »

Are you playing a human opponent or the AI?
The AI does not care if you start over.
If your opponent is human, he will not be happy if his success equals your quitting - he put effort into getting the game this far too.

And If you are playing the AI, I question your policy of not reloading/replaying. Most new players are playing the AI to learn about the game. Redoing a turn is a great way to figure out what works after you have found out what does not work.

And if you have not seen the advice already, be sure to exit the game and restart it - or even restart your computer - to renew the random number settings that are used by the game for "dice rolls". I have found that making lots of changes during turn prep seems to use up all your good luck, but restarting before running the turn usually gives a reasonable result instead of a disaster.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Are you playing a human opponent or the AI?
The AI does not care if you start over.
If your opponent is human, he will not be happy if his success equals your quitting - he put effort into getting the game this far too.

And If you are playing the AI, I question your policy of not reloading/replaying. Most new players are playing the AI to learn about the game. Redoing a turn is a great way to figure out what works after you have found out what does not work.

And if you have not seen the advice already, be sure to exit the game and restart it - or even restart your computer - to renew the random number settings that are used by the game for "dice rolls". I have found that making lots of changes during turn prep seems to use up all your good luck, but restarting before running the turn usually gives a reasonable result instead of a disaster.

Idunno. In this case, I actually recommend NOT reloading. Call it an experiment in hardship. A learning experience! He can learn in case this ever happens to him against a human in a PBEM.


You'll be fine. Load up the "ship availability" screen from the I-key screen and filter for CV/CVL, sort by date. Just look at early 1944. You get maybe a dozen. Then look at the CVEs - you won't need your CVs to cover landings. It'll be great!

Also, August of 1942 is an awfully early time to be trying to counterpunch Rabaul. I think you just learned that. There are a lot of smaller factors that add up to that conclusion, like:

-Ship upgrades (your flak isn't very good yet, at least on most ships)
-Plane upgrades (still Wildcats, Dauntlesses)
-OOB (Order Of Battle - the CV/CVE thing I just mentioned, and you don't have m/any Fletchers!)
-No amphibious assault ships yet
-Still poor USAAF LBA choices
-LCU TOE upgrades
-LCUs in general - only a few marines, not many USMC/USA tank units yet, etc.

I'm sure I missed a few other factors, but hopefully you get the idea.


EDIT: Also, you don't have to exit the game or restart your computer to get a new set of randoms on an AI turn. As the Allies, simply load the wpae002.pws file, which is the pre-turn autosave, and it will run a fresh replay with new randoms when you exit those orders. As Japan, you can also load the wpae002.pws but it won't let you change any orders - it will jump straight into the replay.
DeZanic
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:41 pm

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by DeZanic »

ORIGINAL: John B.

How many carriers do you still have and has the IJN lost any?

One British carrier is operating in the Indian Ocean and Yorktown and Lexington are under repair in Pearl Harbour for a few weeks. Two escort carriers escorting very large convoys of 15+ ships between US and Australia.

So 1 CV in operating in Indian Ocean and 2 CVE in the Pacific is what is left.

The Japanese have lost 3 CV and 1 CVL during this period. I don't know how man they have left.

Plan is now to stay defensive and closely monitor every move of Japanese carriers and avoid. I will switch to fleet in beeing and avoid surface combat with them till February 1943. Switiching also to submarine and sending wolfpacks to hunt their carriers instead. Looks promising so far.. one carrier has been sunk this way and more have been hit but the torpedoes fail too often or else I would have had maybe 2 more sunk japanese carriers by my submarines.

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Are you playing a human opponent or the AI?
The AI does not care if you start over.
If your opponent is human, he will not be happy if his success equals your quitting - he put effort into getting the game this far too.

And If you are playing the AI, I question your policy of not reloading/replaying. Most new players are playing the AI to learn about the game. Redoing a turn is a great way to figure out what works after you have found out what does not work.

And if you have not seen the advice already, be sure to exit the game and restart it - or even restart your computer - to renew the random number settings that are used by the game for "dice rolls". I have found that making lots of changes during turn prep seems to use up all your good luck, but restarting before running the turn usually gives a reasonable result instead of a disaster.


Playing against AI. I have promised myself from the beginning to play this game without reloading because in real life during the second world war the generals can't reload battles they made mistakes at. A loss is a loss and a victory is a victory. The AI does not either reload a battle when he makes a mistake. So I think it is cheating the AI by doing so.

I am trying to be positive and see this as a challenge... war ends in 1946 so I hope I have time to rectify my mistakes.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

ORIGINAL: John B.

How many carriers do you still have and has the IJN lost any?

One British carrier is operating in the Indian Ocean and Yorktown and Lexington are under repair in Pearl Harbour for a few weeks. Two escort carriers escorting very large convoys of 15+ ships between US and Australia.

So 1 CV in operating in Indian Ocean and 2 CVE in the Pacific is what is left.

The Japanese have lost 3 CV and 1 CVL during this period. I don't know how man they have left.

Plan is now to stay defensive and closely monitor every move of Japanese carriers and avoid. I will switch to fleet in beeing and avoid surface combat with them till February 1943. Switiching also to submarine and sending wolfpacks to hunt their carriers instead. Looks promising so far.. one carrier has been sunk this way and more have been hit but the torpedoes fail too often or else I would have had maybe 2 more sunk japanese carriers by my submarines.

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Are you playing a human opponent or the AI?
The AI does not care if you start over.
If your opponent is human, he will not be happy if his success equals your quitting - he put effort into getting the game this far too.

And If you are playing the AI, I question your policy of not reloading/replaying. Most new players are playing the AI to learn about the game. Redoing a turn is a great way to figure out what works after you have found out what does not work.

And if you have not seen the advice already, be sure to exit the game and restart it - or even restart your computer - to renew the random number settings that are used by the game for "dice rolls". I have found that making lots of changes during turn prep seems to use up all your good luck, but restarting before running the turn usually gives a reasonable result instead of a disaster.


Playing against AI. I have promised myself from the beginning to play this game without reloading because in real life during the second world war the generals can't reload battles they made mistakes at. A loss is a loss and a victory is a victory. The AI does not either reload a battle when he makes a mistake. So I think it is cheating the AI by doing so.

I am trying to be positive and see this as a challenge... war ends in 1946 so I hope I have time to rectify my mistakes.

You literally have years. Just know that now, you can't fight the IJN if it shows up in bulk until at least summer of 1943. That doesn't mean you have to sit on your hands, though. There's plenty that you can do to nibble (even bite) around the edges.
User avatar
catwhoorg
Posts: 686
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:47 pm
Location: Uk expat lving near Atlanta

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by catwhoorg »

Once the Essexes come on line, you will more than enough.

Take lessons in caution and move forward slowly. Island hopping if you have to, to get land air coverage.
Image
User avatar
VukyTzar
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:07 pm
Location: Croatia

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by VukyTzar »

Well I am in 21st january 1942 and have lost none, I did managed to sink lexington and saratoga. As japan player I can advise you to pull back and fortify Oz and try to lure enemy KB in your bombets naval attack range... Banshees are almost useless bud hudsons and B17 may do the work... Dont give up[:-]this is good test to see what you can do wizh cripled forces
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2378
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by SuluSea »

Hi, You've lost nothing you can't overcome. You'll be getting tons upon tons of new toys soon. Your Essex, Fletchers, attack landing craft and infantry upgrades will carry the day eventually.

Use the orphaned air groups from the sunk carriers to assist in putting your naval air training in overdrive.



"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

Hi, You've lost nothing you can't overcome. You'll be getting tons upon tons of new toys soon. Your Essex, Fletchers, attack landing craft and infantry upgrades will carry the day eventually.

Use the orphaned air groups from the sunk carriers to assist in putting your naval air training in overdrive.


This is a true silver lining. The USN doesn't have much for on-map pilot training capability.
User avatar
John B.
Posts: 3985
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by John B. »

If the IJN has lost 3 CVs then I don't think you have lost a decisive battle. Remember that by the end of the Guadalcanal battles the IJN had lost 4 CVs and 1 CVL (doing this from memory so I may be a little off) and the USN had lost 4 CVs and the Brits a CVL (the Hermes). In other words, you're at one more -- really 1/2 more since it's a Brit CV -- and the IJN is at one less loss than where things stood historically. With the flood of new production you get this is not a a catastrophe.
John Barr
GetAssista
Posts: 2818
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by GetAssista »

SCLS (sudden carrier loss syndrome) is a serious condition that can develop while using this game. Unpredictable and violent, it can make your life miserable for days. No known treatment exists, infected person should endure and hopefully develop natural resistance. Drink liquids, get lots of fresh air and cuddles from your family and loved ones.
It mostly strikes Japan players though.
DeZanic
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:41 pm

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by DeZanic »

Haha hey thanks guys for chearing me up. I'll try to nibble a little on the edges of the Japanese Empire and start drinking.
User avatar
Macclan5
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:46 pm
Location: Toronto Canada

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by Macclan5 »

Put in perspective you are not really much better or worse off than the Allies were at the very same stage of the war!
They lost Lex - Yorktown - Sara was laid up - and Hornet was also lost. Hermes was sunk by IJN Indian Ocean raid if I recall correctly.
You now have 'historical parity'
A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.
User avatar
Macclan5
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:46 pm
Location: Toronto Canada

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by Macclan5 »

Note: I too am playing a no reload challenge as a relative newbie. Through luck chance perseverance I am doing well I think.
However even I broke my own imposed no reload rule twice now due to stupid omissions of orders I wanted.
At the end of th day it's supposed to be a 'fun game' so play it as such. Continue to play because you want to learn innovative tactics to win - or not.[8D]
There is little value in continuing to "grind out a win" if your heart is not in it. However this is lots of valuable lessons you will learn (before me and others it seems) about the tactics and strategies of this game.
Best wishes. Enjoy
A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.
User avatar
TOMLABEL
Posts: 4473
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 7:50 pm
Location: Alabama - ROLL TIDE!!!!!

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by TOMLABEL »

Been there and have done that (and worse) more than you want to know.

You still have the Lex and the Yorktown - two fabulous carriers, so take care of them.

Like others have said, nibble away and don't expose them to danger. Help from USA is on the way!

TOMLABEL
Image
Art by the Rogue-USMC

WITP Admiral's Edition: Ship & Sub Art/Base Unit Art/Map Icon Art

"If destruction be our lot - it will come from within"...Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by crsutton »

You have traded six for four. Congratulations you are winning the game...Carry on.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
wdolson
Posts: 7648
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by wdolson »

You're doing a little worse than reality, but not by much. The US ended 1942 with 4 of 6 at start carriers sunk and the Enterprise badly damaged. The Enterprise spent most of 1943 being repaired. The Japanese were down 4 CVs and 2 CVLs for 1942 and ended the year with 1 of the remaining two badly damaged. Neither side was really ready for any carrier battles until late 1943 when the Essexes and Independences started to arrive. Even at that the US only raided with the carriers in late 43 to work up the crews and get them ready for combat.

1943 saw the reconquest of the Solomons and the march of the north coast of New Guinea because those campaigns could be pulled off with ground based air and without carriers.

You lost one more British carrier than they did historically, but that's not going to tip the balance of power in any significant way.

Bill
WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer
Image
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5041
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Loss of 6 carriers. Help on moving on?

Post by Yaab »

I guess you could suppress Rabaul by auto-sinking four USN carriers in Rabaul's bay and forming an impenetrable artficial reef there. Just a thought.
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”