Time of Fury Reviews

[SeanD]

76% - 7idGaming.de
Time of Fury has everything you would expect from a Grand Strategy Game.
http://www.7idgaming.de/content.php?120-Wastelands-Interactive-Time-of-Fury-REVIEW


Wargamer
Players with a bend toward World War II grand strategy will no doubt enjoy Time of Fury. Its "beer and pretzels" approach will also attract and hook players who are approaching the genre for the first time, as it is not overly complicated and is very accessible
http://www.wargamer.com/article/3150/pc-game-review-time-of-fury


And another one in French at HISTOGAMES:
http://www.histogames.com/HTML/test/time-of-fury.php
8/10

[doomtrader]

For those who are not feeling comfortable with the language of Goethe
http://translate.google.pl/translate?sl ... ury-REVIEW

[Greyshaft]

I loved the translation - especially the highlighted bit.

"Time of Fury" has basically everything you would expect from a "Grand Strategy Game." Research, production and combat.
Granted, it cuts to many areas only superficially, but who is looking for a complex, multi-front strategy game that could be find here. But you should not ultra complex and detailed strategy epic like Gary Grigsby's "War in the East" expect. Collect this claim even the developers. "Time of Fury" provides good mediocrity in this regard. For casual gamers, but it would be nested under circumstances too. A comparison with Hearts of Iron (turn-based only just) is more appropriate. "

[doomtrader]

Wargamer review added

[doomtrader]

And another one in French at HISTOGAMES:
http://www.histogames.com/HTML/test/time-of-fury.php
8/10

[Rasputitsa]

ORIGINAL: doomtrader

And another one in French at HISTOGAMES:
http://www.histogames.com/HTML/test/time-of-fury.php
8/10

Once the battle is over, a concluding report appears and recognizes losses on both sides. These may seem a little exaggerated at times, and I could see a body count of the Belgian army lost 12,000 in one battle! Each victory brings the experience of your units and these become more effective.

Extract from the review - I think there may be a misunderstanding that losses equal dead bodies, surely losses include troops that can no longer fight, disorganised, without supplies, etc., in 1940 the roads of France and Belgium were full of thousands of disorganised men, not dead, but lost to their own forces, as they were no longer able to fight effectively. Scenes repeated in battles on all fronts.[:)]

[Razz1]

The vanilla values that are used are way too high.